Literature DB >> 28678019

Comprehensive analysis of proton range uncertainties related to stopping-power-ratio estimation using dual-energy CT imaging.

B Li1, H C Lee, X Duan, C Shen, L Zhou, X Jia, M Yang.   

Abstract

The dual-energy CT-based (DECT) approach holds promise in reducing the overall uncertainty in proton stopping-power-ratio (SPR) estimation as compared to the conventional stoichiometric calibration approach. The objective of this study was to analyze the factors contributing to uncertainty in SPR estimation using the DECT-based approach and to derive a comprehensive estimate of the range uncertainty associated with SPR estimation in treatment planning. Two state-of-the-art DECT-based methods were selected and implemented on a Siemens SOMATOM Force DECT scanner. The uncertainties were first divided into five independent categories. The uncertainty associated with each category was estimated for lung, soft and bone tissues separately. A single composite uncertainty estimate was eventually determined for three tumor sites (lung, prostate and head-and-neck) by weighting the relative proportion of each tissue group for that specific site. The uncertainties associated with the two selected DECT methods were found to be similar, therefore the following results applied to both methods. The overall uncertainty (1σ) in SPR estimation with the DECT-based approach was estimated to be 3.8%, 1.2% and 2.0% for lung, soft and bone tissues, respectively. The dominant factor contributing to uncertainty in the DECT approach was the imaging uncertainties, followed by the DECT modeling uncertainties. Our study showed that the DECT approach can reduce the overall range uncertainty to approximately 2.2% (2σ) in clinical scenarios, in contrast to the previously reported 1%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28678019      PMCID: PMC5736379          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa7dc9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  26 in total

1.  Methodologies and tools for proton beam design for lung tumors.

Authors:  M F Moyers; D W Miller; D A Bush; J D Slater
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 2.  Vision 20/20: proton therapy.

Authors:  Alfred R Smith
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Does kV-MV dual-energy computed tomography have an advantage in determining proton stopping power ratios in patients?

Authors:  M Yang; G Virshup; J Clayton; X R Zhu; R Mohan; L Dong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Experimental verification of ion stopping power prediction from dual energy CT data in tissue surrogates.

Authors:  Paolo Farace
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  A robust empirical parametrization of proton stopping power using dual energy CT.

Authors:  Vicki T Taasti; Jørgen B B Petersen; Ludvig P Muren; Jesper Thygesen; David C Hansen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  Treatment planning optimisation in proton therapy.

Authors:  S E McGowan; N G Burnet; A J Lomax
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Site-specific range uncertainties caused by dose calculation algorithms for proton therapy.

Authors:  J Schuemann; S Dowdell; C Grassberger; C H Min; H Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Controversies in clinical trials in proton radiotherapy: the present and the future.

Authors:  Robert C Miller; Mark Lodge; Mohammad Hassan Murad; Bleddyn Jones
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.934

9.  The precision of proton range calculations in proton radiotherapy treatment planning: experimental verification of the relation between CT-HU and proton stopping power.

Authors:  B Schaffner; E Pedroni
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  17 in total

1.  Material elemental decomposition in dual and multi-energy CT via a sparsity-dictionary approach for proton stopping power ratio calculation.

Authors:  Chenyang Shen; Bin Li; Liyuan Chen; Ming Yang; Yifei Lou; Xun Jia
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Systematic analysis of the impact of imaging noise on dual-energy CT-based proton stopping power ratio estimation.

Authors:  Hugh H C Lee; Bin Li; Xinhui Duan; Linghong Zhou; Xun Jia; Ming Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Status and innovations in pre-treatment CT imaging for proton therapy.

Authors:  Patrick Wohlfahrt; Christian Richter
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  A prior image constraint robust principal component analysis reconstruction method for sparse segmental multi-energy computed tomography.

Authors:  Bin Li; Ning Luo; Anni Zhong; Yongbao Li; Along Chen; Linghong Zhou; Yuan Xu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-09

5.  Learning-based synthetic dual energy CT imaging from single energy CT for stopping power ratio calculation in proton radiation therapy.

Authors:  Serdar Charyyev; Tonghe Wang; Yang Lei; Beth Ghavidel; Jonathan J Beitler; Mark McDonald; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Jun Zhou; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Improved accuracy of relative electron density and proton stopping power ratio through CycleGAN machine learning.

Authors:  Jessica Scholey; Luciano Vinas; Vasant Kearney; Sue Yom; Peder Eric Zufall Larson; Martina Descovich; Atchar Sudhyadhom
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 4.174

7.  MULTI-ENERGY CONE-BEAM CT RECONSTRUCTION WITH A SPATIAL SPECTRAL NONLOCAL MEANS ALGORITHM.

Authors:  Bin Li; Chenyang Shen; Yujie Chi; Ming Yang; Yifei Lou; Linghong Zhou; Xun Jia
Journal:  SIAM J Imaging Sci       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 2.867

8.  Feasibility of using post-contrast dual-energy CT for pediatric radiation treatment planning and dose calculation.

Authors:  Ozgur Ates; Chia-Ho Hua; Li Zhao; Nadav Shapira; Yoad Yagil; Thomas E Merchant; Matthew Krasin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  Technical Principles of Dual-Energy Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Clinical Applications for Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Shailaja Sajja; Young Lee; Markus Eriksson; Håkan Nordström; Arjun Sahgal; Masoud Hashemi; James G Mainprize; Mark Ruschin
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-07-30

10.  Technical Note: A methodology for improved accuracy in stopping power estimation using MRI and CT.

Authors:  Jessica E Scholey; Dharshan Chandramohan; Tarun Naren; William Liu; Peder Eric Zufall Larson; Atchar Sudhyadhom
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.