OBJECTIVE: Dual energy CT (DECT) has been shown to estimate stopping power ratio (SPR) map with a higher accuracy than conventional single energy CT (SECT) by obtaining the energy dependence of photon interactions. This work presents a learning-based method to synthesize DECT images from SECT image for proton radiotherapy. METHODS: The proposed method uses a residual attention generative adversarial network. Residual blocks with attention gates were used to force the model to focus on the difference between DECT images and SECT images. To evaluate the accuracy of the method, we retrospectively investigated 70 head-and-neck cancer patients whose DECT and SECT scans were acquired simultaneously. The model was trained to generate both a high and low energy DECT image based on a SECT image. The generated synthetic low and high DECT images were evaluated against the true DECT images using leave-one-out cross-validation. To evaluate our method in the context of a practical application, we generated SPR maps from synthetic DECT (sDECT) using a dual-energy based stoichiometric method and compared the SPR maps to those generated from DECT. A dosimetric comparison for dose obtained from DECT was performed against that derived from sDECT. RESULTS: The mean of mean absolute error, peak signal-to-noise ratio and normalized cross-correlation for the synthetic high and low energy CT images was 36.9 HU, 29.3 dB, 0.96 and 35.8 HU, 29.2 dB, and 0.96, respectively. The corresponding SPR maps generated from synthetic DECT showed an average normalized mean square deviation of about 1% with reduced noise level and artifacts than those from original DECT. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics for the clinical target volume agree within 1% between the DECT and sDECT calculated dose. CONCLUSION: Our method synthesized accurate DECT images and showed a potential feasibility for proton SPR map generation. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study investigated a learning-based method to synthesize DECT images from SECT image for proton radiotherapy.
OBJECTIVE: Dual energy CT (DECT) has been shown to estimate stopping power ratio (SPR) map with a higher accuracy than conventional single energy CT (SECT) by obtaining the energy dependence of photon interactions. This work presents a learning-based method to synthesize DECT images from SECT image for proton radiotherapy. METHODS: The proposed method uses a residual attention generative adversarial network. Residual blocks with attention gates were used to force the model to focus on the difference between DECT images and SECT images. To evaluate the accuracy of the method, we retrospectively investigated 70 head-and-neck cancer patients whose DECT and SECT scans were acquired simultaneously. The model was trained to generate both a high and low energy DECT image based on a SECT image. The generated synthetic low and high DECT images were evaluated against the true DECT images using leave-one-out cross-validation. To evaluate our method in the context of a practical application, we generated SPR maps from synthetic DECT (sDECT) using a dual-energy based stoichiometric method and compared the SPR maps to those generated from DECT. A dosimetric comparison for dose obtained from DECT was performed against that derived from sDECT. RESULTS: The mean of mean absolute error, peak signal-to-noise ratio and normalized cross-correlation for the synthetic high and low energy CT images was 36.9 HU, 29.3 dB, 0.96 and 35.8 HU, 29.2 dB, and 0.96, respectively. The corresponding SPR maps generated from synthetic DECT showed an average normalized mean square deviation of about 1% with reduced noise level and artifacts than those from original DECT. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics for the clinical target volume agree within 1% between the DECT and sDECT calculated dose. CONCLUSION: Our method synthesized accurate DECT images and showed a potential feasibility for proton SPR map generation. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study investigated a learning-based method to synthesize DECT images from SECT image for proton radiotherapy.
Authors: Lifeng Yu; Jodie A Christner; Shuai Leng; Jia Wang; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough Journal: Med Phys Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Andrew N Primak; Joel G Fletcher; Terri J Vrtiska; Oleksandr P Dzyubak; John C Lieske; Molly E Jackson; James C Williams; Cynthia H McCollough Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Elise D Roele; Veronique C M L Timmer; Lauretta A A Vaassen; Anna M J L van Kroonenburgh; A A Postma Journal: Curr Radiol Rep Date: 2017-03-29