Literature DB >> 19291995

Vision 20/20: proton therapy.

Alfred R Smith1.   

Abstract

The first patients were treated with proton beams in 1955 at the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory in California. In 1970, proton beams began to be used in research facilities to treat cancer patients using fractionated treatment regimens. It was not until 1990 that proton treatments were carried out in hospital-based facilities using technology and techniques that were comparable to those for modern photon therapy. Clinical data strongly support the conclusion that proton therapy is superior to conventional radiation therapy in a number of disease sites. Treatment planning studies have shown that proton dose distributions are superior to those for photons in a wide range of disease sites indicating that additional clinical gains can be achieved if these treatment plans can be reliably delivered to patients. Optimum proton dose distributions can be achieved with intensity modulated protons (IMPT), but very few patients have received this advanced form of treatment. It is anticipated widespread implementation of IMPT would provide additional improvements in clinical outcomes. Advances in the last decade have led to an increased interest in proton therapy. Currently, proton therapy is undergoing transitions that will move it into the mainstream of cancer treatment. For example, proton therapy is now reimbursed, there has been rapid development in proton therapy technology, and many new options are available for equipment, facility configuration, and financing. During the next decade, new developments will increase the efficiency and accuracy of proton therapy and enhance our ability to verify treatment planning calculations and perform quality assurance for proton therapy delivery. With the implementation of new multi-institution clinical studies and the routine availability of IMPT, it may be possible, within the next decade, to quantify the clinical gains obtained from optimized proton therapy. During this same period several new proton therapy facilities will be built and the cost of proton therapy is expected to decrease, making proton therapy routinely available to a larger population of cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19291995     DOI: 10.1118/1.3058485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  26 in total

1.  A generalized 2D pencil beam scaling algorithm for proton dose calculation in heterogeneous slab geometries.

Authors:  David C Westerly; Xiaohu Mo; Wolfgang A Tomé; Thomas R Mackie; Paul M DeLuca
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Material elemental decomposition in dual and multi-energy CT via a sparsity-dictionary approach for proton stopping power ratio calculation.

Authors:  Chenyang Shen; Bin Li; Liyuan Chen; Ming Yang; Yifei Lou; Xun Jia
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Effect of secondary particles on image quality of dynamic flat panels in carbon ion scanning beam treatment.

Authors:  S Mori; S Amano; T Furukawa; T Shirai; K Noda
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  CMOS Active Pixel Sensors as energy-range detectors for proton Computed Tomography.

Authors:  M Esposito; T Anaxagoras; P M Evans; S Green; S Manolopoulos; J Nieto-Camero; D J Parker; G Poludniowski; T Price; C Waltham; N M Allinson
Journal:  J Instrum       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 1.415

Review 5.  Patient positioning in the proton radiotherapy era.

Authors:  Salvatore Devicienti; Lidia Strigari; Marco D'Andrea; Marcello Benassi; Vincenzo Dimiccoli; Maurizio Portaluri
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-05-13

Review 6.  Proton therapy - Present and future.

Authors:  Radhe Mohan; David Grosshans
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-12-03       Impact factor: 15.470

7.  A procedure to determine the planar integral spot dose values of proton pencil beam spots.

Authors:  Aman Anand; Narayan Sahoo; X Ronald Zhu; Gabriel O Sawakuchi; Falk Poenisch; Richard A Amos; George Ciangaru; Uwe Titt; Kazumichi Suzuki; Radhe Mohan; Michael T Gillin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Reduction of the secondary neutron dose in passively scattered proton radiotherapy, using an optimized pre-collimator/collimator.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Carl D Elliston; Eric J Hall; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Comprehensive analysis of proton range uncertainties related to stopping-power-ratio estimation using dual-energy CT imaging.

Authors:  B Li; H C Lee; X Duan; C Shen; L Zhou; X Jia; M Yang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Dosimetric impact of random spot positioning errors in intensity modulated proton therapy plans of small and large volume tumors.

Authors:  Manikandan Arjunan; Ganapathy Krishnan; Dayananda Shamurailatpam Sharma; Noufal M P; Kartikeshwar C Patro; Rajesh Thiyagarajan; Chilukuri Srinivas; Rakesh Jalali
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.