Literature DB >> 29405340

Material elemental decomposition in dual and multi-energy CT via a sparsity-dictionary approach for proton stopping power ratio calculation.

Chenyang Shen1, Bin Li1,2, Liyuan Chen1, Ming Yang1, Yifei Lou3, Xun Jia1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Accurate calculation of proton stopping power ratio (SPR) relative to water is crucial to proton therapy treatment planning, since SPR affects prediction of beam range. Current standard practice derives SPR using a single CT scan. Recent studies showed that dual-energy CT (DECT) offers advantages to accurately determine SPR. One method to further improve accuracy is to incorporate prior knowledge on human tissue composition through a dictionary approach. In addition, it is also suggested that using CT images with multiple (more than two) energy channels, i.e., multi-energy CT (MECT), can further improve accuracy. In this paper, we proposed a sparse dictionary-based method to convert CT numbers of DECT or MECT to elemental composition (EC) and relative electron density (rED) for SPR computation.
METHOD: A dictionary was constructed to include materials generated based on human tissues of known compositions. For a voxel with CT numbers of different energy channels, its EC and rED are determined subject to a constraint that the resulting EC is a linear non-negative combination of only a few tissues in the dictionary. We formulated this as a non-convex optimization problem. A novel algorithm was designed to solve the problem. The proposed method has a unified structure to handle both DECT and MECT with different number of channels. We tested our method in both simulation and experimental studies.
RESULTS: Average errors of SPR in experimental studies were 0.70% in DECT, 0.53% in MECT with three energy channels, and 0.45% in MECT with four channels. We also studied the impact of parameter values and established appropriate parameter values for our method.
CONCLUSION: The proposed method can accurately calculate SPR using DECT and MECT. The results suggest that using more energy channels may improve the SPR estimation accuracy.
© 2018 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dictionary; dual- and multi-energy CT; elemental decomposition; proton therapy; sparsity; stopping power ratio

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29405340      PMCID: PMC5904041          DOI: 10.1002/mp.12796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  33 in total

Review 1.  Vision 20/20: proton therapy.

Authors:  Alfred R Smith
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Radiological use of fast protons.

Authors:  R R WILSON
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1946-11       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Deriving concentrations of oxygen and carbon in human tissues using single- and dual-energy CT for ion therapy applications.

Authors:  Guillaume Landry; Katia Parodi; Joachim E Wildberger; Frank Verhaegen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Quantitative imaging of element composition and mass fraction using dual-energy CT: three-material decomposition.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Lifeng Yu; Andrew N Primak; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Does kV-MV dual-energy computed tomography have an advantage in determining proton stopping power ratios in patients?

Authors:  M Yang; G Virshup; J Clayton; X R Zhu; R Mohan; L Dong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  X-ray energies for effective atomic number determination.

Authors:  R A Rutherford; B R Pullan; I Isherwood
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  A Bayesian approach to solve proton stopping powers from noisy multi-energy CT data.

Authors:  Arthur Lalonde; Esther Bär; Hugo Bouchard
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  GPU-based high-performance computing for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Xun Jia; Peter Ziegenhein; Steve B Jiang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Comprehensive analysis of proton range uncertainties related to stopping-power-ratio estimation using dual-energy CT imaging.

Authors:  B Li; H C Lee; X Duan; C Shen; L Zhou; X Jia; M Yang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  8 in total

1.  Model-based material decomposition with a penalized nonlinear least-squares CT reconstruction algorithm.

Authors:  Steven Tilley; Wojciech Zbijewski; J Webster Stayman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Theoretical and experimental analysis of photon counting detector CT for proton stopping power prediction.

Authors:  Vicki T Taasti; David C Hansen; Gregory J Michalak; Amanda J Deisher; Jon J Kruse; Ludvig P Muren; Jørgen B B Petersen; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Status and innovations in pre-treatment CT imaging for proton therapy.

Authors:  Patrick Wohlfahrt; Christian Richter
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  DECT-MULTRA: Dual-Energy CT Image Decomposition With Learned Mixed Material Models and Efficient Clustering.

Authors:  Zhipeng Li; Saiprasad Ravishankar; Yong Long; Jeffrey A Fessler
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Improving dose calculation accuracy in preclinical radiation experiments using multi-energy element resolved cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Yanqi Huang; Xiaoyu Hu; Yuncheng Zhong; Youfang Lai; Chenyang Shen; Xun Jia
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  Dental management in head and neck cancers: from intensity-modulated radiotherapy with photons to proton therapy.

Authors:  Sabah Falek; Rajesh Regmi; Joel Herault; Melanie Dore; Anthony Vela; Pauline Dutheil; Cyril Moignier; Pierre-Yves Marcy; Julien Drouet; Arnaud Beddok; Noah E Letwin; Joel Epstein; Upendra Parvathaneni; Juliette Thariat
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.359

7.  NRG Oncology Survey of Monte Carlo Dose Calculation Use in US Proton Therapy Centers.

Authors:  Liyong Lin; Paige A Taylor; Jiajian Shen; Jatinder Saini; Minglei Kang; Charles B Simone; Jeffrey D Bradley; Zuofeng Li; Ying Xiao
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2021-05-25

8.  Simultaneous Image Reconstruction and Element Decomposition for Iodine Contrast Agent Visualization in Multienergy Element-Resolved Cone Beam CT.

Authors:  Chao Wang; Hyunuk Jung; Ming Yang; Chenyang Shen; Xun Jia
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 6.244

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.