Literature DB >> 23255545

Treatment planning optimisation in proton therapy.

S E McGowan1, N G Burnet, A J Lomax.   

Abstract

The goal of radiotherapy is to achieve uniform target coverage while sparing normal tissue. In proton therapy, the same sources of geometric uncertainty are present as in conventional radiotherapy. However, an important and fundamental difference in proton therapy is that protons have a finite range, highly dependent on the electron density of the material they are traversing, resulting in a steep dose gradient at the distal edge of the Bragg peak. Therefore, an accurate knowledge of the sources and magnitudes of the uncertainties affecting the proton range is essential for producing plans which are robust to these uncertainties. This review describes the current knowledge of the geometric uncertainties and discusses their impact on proton dose plans. The need for patient-specific validation is essential and in cases of complex intensity-modulated proton therapy plans the use of a planning target volume (PTV) may fail to ensure coverage of the target. In cases where a PTV cannot be used, other methods of quantifying plan quality have been investigated. A promising option is to incorporate uncertainties directly into the optimisation algorithm. A further development is the inclusion of robustness into a multicriteria optimisation framework, allowing a multi-objective Pareto optimisation function to balance robustness and conformity. The question remains as to whether adaptive therapy can become an integral part of a proton therapy, to allow re-optimisation during the course of a patient's treatment. The challenge of ensuring that plans are robust to range uncertainties in proton therapy remains, although these methods can provide practical solutions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23255545      PMCID: PMC4651068          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20120288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  55 in total

1.  Motion adaptive x-ray therapy: a feasibility study.

Authors:  P J Keall; V R Kini; S S Vedam; R Mohan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  Optimized planning using physical objectives and constraints.

Authors:  T Bortfeld
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.934

3.  Intensity modulated radiotherapy with charged particle beams: studies of inverse treatment planning for rotation therapy.

Authors:  U Oelfke; T Bortfeld
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  The clinical potential of intensity modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Antony J Lomax; Eros Pedroni; Hanspeter Rutz; Gudrun Goitein
Journal:  Z Med Phys       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.820

5.  Range uncertainty in proton therapy due to variable biological effectiveness.

Authors:  Alejandro Carabe; Maryam Moteabbed; Nicolas Depauw; Jan Schuemann; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  Motion in radiotherapy: particle therapy.

Authors:  C Bert; M Durante
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Including robustness in multi-criteria optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Jan Unkelbach; Alexei Trofimov; Thomas Madden; Hanne Kooy; Thomas Bortfeld; David Craft
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  Charged particles in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Jay S Loeffler
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  A new concept for interactive radiotherapy planning with multicriteria optimization: first clinical evaluation.

Authors:  Christian Thieke; Karl-Heinz Küfer; Michael Monz; Alexander Scherrer; Fernando Alonso; Uwe Oelfke; Peter E Huber; Jürgen Debus; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 10.  Charged particles in radiotherapy: a 5-year update of a systematic review.

Authors:  Dirk De Ruysscher; M Mark Lodge; Bleddyn Jones; Michael Brada; Alastair Munro; Thomas Jefferson; Madelon Pijls-Johannesma
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 6.280

View more
  21 in total

1.  Radiogenomic Predictors of Adverse Effects following Charged Particle Therapy.

Authors:  Lindsay M Morton; Luisel Ricks-Santi; Catharine M L West; Barry S Rosenstein
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

Review 2.  Treatment planning for proton therapy: what is needed in the next 10 years?

Authors:  Hakan Nystrom; Maria Fuglsang Jensen; Petra Witt Nystrom
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Proton therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Current knowledges and future perspectives.

Authors:  Gyu Sang Yoo; Jeong Il Yu; Hee Chul Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Radiation oncology in the era of precision medicine.

Authors:  Michael Baumann; Mechthild Krause; Jens Overgaard; Jürgen Debus; Søren M Bentzen; Juliane Daartz; Christian Richter; Daniel Zips; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 5.  Proton Beam Therapy in Liver Malignancies.

Authors:  Osman Siddiqui; Ariel Pollock; Santanu Samanta; Adeel Kaiser; Jason K Molitoris
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 6.  Proton beam therapy: perspectives on the National Health Service England clinical service and research programme.

Authors:  Neil G Burnet; Ranald I Mackay; Ed Smith; Amy L Chadwick; Gillian A Whitfield; David J Thomson; Matthew Lowe; Norman F Kirkby; Adrian M Crellin; Karen J Kirkby
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  AAR-RT - A system for auto-contouring organs at risk on CT images for radiation therapy planning: Principles, design, and large-scale evaluation on head-and-neck and thoracic cancer cases.

Authors:  Xingyu Wu; Jayaram K Udupa; Yubing Tong; Dewey Odhner; Gargi V Pednekar; Charles B Simone; David McLaughlin; Chavanon Apinorasethkul; Ontida Apinorasethkul; John Lukens; Dimitris Mihailidis; Geraldine Shammo; Paul James; Akhil Tiwari; Lisa Wojtowicz; Joseph Camaratta; Drew A Torigian
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 8.545

8.  Comprehensive analysis of proton range uncertainties related to stopping-power-ratio estimation using dual-energy CT imaging.

Authors:  B Li; H C Lee; X Duan; C Shen; L Zhou; X Jia; M Yang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Inter-fraction robustness of intensity-modulated proton therapy in the post-operative treatment of oropharyngeal and oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Christina Hague; Marianne Aznar; Lei Dong; Alireza Fotouhi-Ghiam; Lip Wai Lee; Taoran Li; Alexander Lin; Matthew Lowe; John N Lukens; Andrew McPartlin; Shannon O'Reilly; Nick Slevin; Samuel Swisher-Mcclure; David Thomson; Marcel Van Herk; Catharine West; Wei Zou; Boon-Keng Kevin Teo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Benchmarking a commercial proton therapy solution: The Paul Scherrer Institut experience.

Authors:  Sara Rosas; Francesca M Belosi; Nicola Bizzocchi; Till Böhlen; Stefan Zepter; Petra Morach; Antony J Lomax; Damien C Weber; Jan Hrbacek
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.