Literature DB >> 28670056

Clinical experience with machine log file software for volumetric-modulated arc therapy techniques.

Luis Alberto Vazquez-Quino1, Claudia Ivette Huerta-Hernandez1, Dharanipathy Rangaraj1.   

Abstract

Mobius FX, an add-on software module from Mobius Medical Systems™ for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA), uses linac treatment logs to efficiently calculate and verify the 3D dose delivered to patients. An advantage of the Mobius FX module is that it does not require device positioning. In this study, we compared the Mobius FX with another QA option, ArcCheck, as well as with the treatment planning system (TPS) using 30 volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans planned and delivered on a Varian TrueBeam linac. The plans, which involved 6 and 10 MV and consisted of 2 to 3 arcs per plan, were selected to provide a clinically relevant sample. The average gamma value for all plans between Mobius FX and the TPS was 99.96% for the criterion of 3%-3 mm and 98.80% for the criterion of 2%-2 mm. Very similar results were found when comparing Mobius FX and the TPS dose calculations with those acquired by traditional methods (i.e., ArcCheck). As the gamma criterion of the analysis was narrowed, discrepancies between Mobius FX and traditional methods appeared. Profile analysis showed the production of comparable results when using the Mobius FX method or traditional QA methods. In conclusion, the Mobius FX method for pretreatment of patient-specific QA is capable of producing results similar to those obtained by traditional methods.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28670056      PMCID: PMC5468012          DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2017.11929614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)        ISSN: 0899-8280


  15 in total

1.  Dosimetric quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiotherapy feasibility study for a filmless approach.

Authors:  Tilo Wiezorek; Nico Banz; Michael Schwedas; Marcel Scheithauer; Henning Salz; Dietmar Georg; Thomas G Wendt
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  An intercomparison between film dosimetry and diode matrix for IMRT quality assurance.

Authors:  F Banci Buonamici; A Compagnucci; L Marrazzo; S Russo; M Bucciolini
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Optimization of the gafchromic EBT protocol for IMRT QA.

Authors:  Frank Schneider; Martin Polednik; Dirk Wolff; Volker Steil; Anna Delana; Frederik Wenz; Loris Menegotti
Journal:  Z Med Phys       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.820

4.  Investigation of various energy deposition kernel refinements for the convolution∕superposition method.

Authors:  Jessie Y Huang; David Eklund; Nathan L Childress; Rebecca M Howell; Dragan Mirkovic; David S Followill; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  A comparison of the gamma index analysis in various commercial IMRT/VMAT QA systems.

Authors:  Mohammad Hussein; Pejman Rowshanfarzad; Martin A Ebert; Andrew Nisbet; Catharine H Clark
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Evaluation of the ArcCHECK QA system for IMRT and VMAT verification.

Authors:  Guangjun Li; Yingjie Zhang; Xiaoqin Jiang; Sen Bai; Guang Peng; Kui Wu; Qingfeng Jiang
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 2.685

7.  Evaluation of a new VMAT QA device, or the "X" and "O" array geometries.

Authors:  Vladimir Feygelman; Geoffrey Zhang; Craig Stevens; Benjamin E Nelms
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Comparison of two commercial detector arrays for IMRT quality assurance.

Authors:  Jonathan G Li; Guanghua Yan; Chihray Liu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  On the sensitivity of patient-specific IMRT QA to MLC positioning errors.

Authors:  Guanghua Yan; Chihray Liu; Thomas A Simon; Lee-Cheng Peng; Christopher Fox; Jonathan G Li
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Evaluation of a novel secondary check tool for intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Jonas D Fontenot
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  5 in total

1.  Deep Learning for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance: Predicting Gamma Passing Rates for IMRT Based on Delivery Fluence Informed by log Files.

Authors:  Ying Huang; Yifei Pi; Kui Ma; Xiaojuan Miao; Sichao Fu; Zhen Zhu; Yifan Cheng; Zhepei Zhang; Hua Chen; Hao Wang; Hengle Gu; Yan Shao; Yanhua Duan; Aihui Feng; Weihai Zhuo; Zhiyong Xu
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

2.  Trajectory log file sensitivity: A critical analysis using DVH and EPID.

Authors:  Wui Ann Woon; Paul B Ravindran; Piyasiri Ekayanake; Subramani Vikraman; Siti Amirah; Yivonne Y F Lim; Christopher H S Vun; Jamsari Khalid
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-08-13

3.  Assessment of log-based fingerprinting system of Mobius3D with Elekta linear accelerators.

Authors:  Yu-Yun Noh; Jihun Kim; Jin Sung Kim; Han-Back Shin; Min Cheol Han; Tae Suk Suh
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Insensitivity of machine log files to MLC leaf backlash and effect of MLC backlash on clinical dynamic MLC motion: An experimental investigation.

Authors:  Michael Barnes; Dennis Pomare; Marcus Doebrich; Therese S Standen; Joshua Wolf; Peter Greer; John Simpson
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 2.243

5.  Patient-specific quality assurance using machine log files analysis for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

Authors:  Vivian U Y Chow; Monica W K Kan; Anthony T C Chan
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 2.243

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.