Literature DB >> 24320507

Investigation of various energy deposition kernel refinements for the convolution∕superposition method.

Jessie Y Huang1, David Eklund, Nathan L Childress, Rebecca M Howell, Dragan Mirkovic, David S Followill, Stephen F Kry.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Several simplifications used in clinical implementations of the convolution∕superposition (C∕S) method, specifically, density scaling of water kernels for heterogeneous media and use of a single polyenergetic kernel, lead to dose calculation inaccuracies. Although these weaknesses of the C∕S method are known, it is not well known which of these simplifications has the largest effect on dose calculation accuracy in clinical situations. The purpose of this study was to generate and characterize high-resolution, polyenergetic, and material-specific energy deposition kernels (EDKs), as well as to investigate the dosimetric impact of implementing spatially variant polyenergetic and material-specific kernels in a collapsed cone C∕S algorithm.
METHODS: High-resolution, monoenergetic water EDKs and various material-specific EDKs were simulated using the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code. Polyenergetic kernels, reflecting the primary spectrum of a clinical 6 MV photon beam at different locations in a water phantom, were calculated for different depths, field sizes, and off-axis distances. To investigate the dosimetric impact of implementing spatially variant polyenergetic kernels, depth dose curves in water were calculated using two different implementations of the collapsed cone C∕S method. The first method uses a single polyenergetic kernel, while the second method fully takes into account spectral changes in the convolution calculation. To investigate the dosimetric impact of implementing material-specific kernels, depth dose curves were calculated for a simplified titanium implant geometry using both a traditional C∕S implementation that performs density scaling of water kernels and a novel implementation using material-specific kernels.
RESULTS: For our high-resolution kernels, we found good agreement with the Mackie et al. kernels, with some differences near the interaction site for low photon energies (<500 keV). For our spatially variant polyenergetic kernels, we found that depth was the most dominant factor affecting the pattern of energy deposition; however, the effects of field size and off-axis distance were not negligible. For the material-specific kernels, we found that as the density of the material increased, more energy was deposited laterally by charged particles, as opposed to in the forward direction. Thus, density scaling of water kernels becomes a worse approximation as the density and the effective atomic number of the material differ more from water. Implementation of spatially variant, polyenergetic kernels increased the percent depth dose value at 25 cm depth by 2.1%-5.8% depending on the field size, while implementation of titanium kernels gave 4.9% higher dose upstream of the metal cavity (i.e., higher backscatter dose) and 8.2% lower dose downstream of the cavity.
CONCLUSIONS: Of the various kernel refinements investigated, inclusion of depth-dependent and metal-specific kernels into the C∕S method has the greatest potential to improve dose calculation accuracy. Implementation of spatially variant polyenergetic kernels resulted in a harder depth dose curve and thus has the potential to affect beam modeling parameters obtained in the commissioning process. For metal implants, the C∕S algorithms generally underestimate the dose upstream and overestimate the dose downstream of the implant. Implementation of a metal-specific kernel mitigated both of these errors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24320507      PMCID: PMC3856653          DOI: 10.1118/1.4831758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  17 in total

1.  Dose for non-electronic equilibrium conditions.

Authors:  W C ROESCH
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1958-10       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Beam hardening of 10 MV radiotherapy x-rays: analysis using a convolution/superposition method.

Authors:  P E Metcalfe; P W Hoban; D C Murray; W H Round
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Photon beam convolution using polyenergetic energy deposition kernels.

Authors:  P W Hoban; D C Murray; W H Round
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Correcting kernel tilting and hardening in convolution/superposition dose calculations for clinical divergent and polychromatic photon beams.

Authors:  H H Liu; T R Mackie; E C McCullough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Generation of photon energy deposition kernels using the EGS Monte Carlo code.

Authors:  T R Mackie; A F Bielajew; D W Rogers; J J Battista
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  The validity of the density scaling method in primary electron transport for photon and electron beams.

Authors:  M K Woo; J R Cunningham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Collapsed cone convolution of radiant energy for photon dose calculation in heterogeneous media.

Authors:  A Ahnesjö
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Investigation of the convolution method for polyenergetic spectra.

Authors:  N Papanikolaou; T R Mackie; C Meger-Wells; M Gehring; P Reckwerdt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  The density scaling theorem applied to lateral electronic equilibrium.

Authors:  J E O'Connor
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1984 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  A convolution method of calculating dose for 15-MV x rays.

Authors:  T R Mackie; J W Scrimger; J J Battista
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  7 in total

1.  An evaluation of three commercially available metal artifact reduction methods for CT imaging.

Authors:  Jessie Y Huang; James R Kerns; Jessica L Nute; Xinming Liu; Peter A Balter; Francesco C Stingo; David S Followill; Dragan Mirkovic; Rebecca M Howell; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Approaches to reducing photon dose calculation errors near metal implants.

Authors:  Jessie Y Huang; David S Followill; Rebecca M Howell; Xinming Liu; Dragan Mirkovic; Francesco C Stingo; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Clinical experience with machine log file software for volumetric-modulated arc therapy techniques.

Authors:  Luis Alberto Vazquez-Quino; Claudia Ivette Huerta-Hernandez; Dharanipathy Rangaraj
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2017-07

4.  Stereotactic radiotherapy of intrapulmonary lesions: comparison of different dose calculation algorithms for Oncentra MasterPlan®.

Authors:  Almut Troeller; Sylvia Garny; Sophia Pachmann; Steffi Kantz; Sabine Gerum; Farkhad Manapov; Ute Ganswindt; Claus Belka; Matthias Söhn
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Dosimetric validation and clinical implementation of two 3D dose verification systems for quality assurance in volumetric-modulated arc therapy techniques.

Authors:  Francisco Clemente-Gutiérrez; Consuelo Pérez-Vara
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Investigation of the Scaling Formula Accuracy for Poly-energetic Kernel Calculation in 6 MV Photon Beam.

Authors:  Tahereh Hadisinia; Ghazale Geraily; Seyed Mohsen Etesami; Mojtaba Hoseini-Ghahfarokhi; Atefeh Mahmoudi; Mostafa Farzin; Maryam Maleki
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2021-04-01

7.  Assessment of radiobiological metrics applied to patient-specific QA process of VMAT prostate treatments.

Authors:  Francisco Clemente-Gutiérrez; Consuelo Pérez-Vara; María H Clavo-Herranz; Concepción López-Carrizosa; José Pérez-Regadera; Carmen Ibáñez-Villoslada
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.