Literature DB >> 28491907

Comprehensive assessment of patient image quality and radiation dose in latest generation cardiac x-ray equipment for percutaneous coronary interventions.

Amber J Gislason-Lee1, Claire Keeble2, Daniel Egleston1, Josephine Bexon1, Stephen M Kengyelics1, Andrew G Davies1.   

Abstract

This study aimed to determine whether a reduction in radiation dose was found for percutaneous coronary interventional (PCI) patients using a cardiac interventional x-ray system with state-of-the-art image enhancement and x-ray optimization, compared to the current generation x-ray system, and to determine the corresponding impact on clinical image quality. Patient procedure dose area product (DAP) and fluoroscopy duration of 131 PCI patient cases from each x-ray system were compared using a Wilcoxon test on median values. Significant reductions in patient dose ([Formula: see text]) were found for the new system with no significant change in fluoroscopy duration ([Formula: see text]); procedure DAP reduced by 64%, fluoroscopy DAP by 51%, and "cine" acquisition DAP by 76%. The image quality of 15 patient angiograms from each x-ray system (30 total) was scored by 75 clinical professionals on a continuous scale for the ability to determine the presence and severity of stenotic lesions; image quality scores were analyzed using a two-sample [Formula: see text]-test. Image quality was reduced by 9% ([Formula: see text]) for the new x-ray system. This demonstrates a substantial reduction in patient dose, from acquisition more than fluoroscopy imaging, with slightly reduced image quality, for the new x-ray system compared to the current generation system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  image quality; observer study; percutaneous coronary interventions; radiation dose; x-ray imaging

Year:  2017        PMID: 28491907      PMCID: PMC5412945          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.2.025501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  25 in total

Review 1.  Occupational radiation doses to operators performing fluoroscopically-guided procedures.

Authors:  Kwang Pyo Kim; Donald L Miller; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Stephen Balter; Ruth A Kleinerman; Evgenia Ostroumova; Steven L Simon; Martha S Linet
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.316

2.  Radiation dose of interventional radiology system using a flat-panel detector.

Authors:  Koichi Chida; Yohei Inaba; Haruo Saito; Tadashi Ishibashi; Shoki Takahashi; Masahiro Kohzuki; Masayuki Zuguchi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Evaluating imaging systems: practical applications.

Authors:  Magnus Båth
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 0.972

4.  Radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary angiograms performed by the radial compared with the femoral route.

Authors:  Gerritjan Kuipers; Ronak Delewi; Xandra L Velders; Marije M Vis; Rene J van der Schaaf; Karel T Koch; José P S Henriques; Robbert J de Winter; Jan Baan; Jan G P Tijssen; Jan J Piek
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 11.195

Review 5.  Methods for the analysis of ordinal response data in medical image quality assessment.

Authors:  Claire Keeble; Paul D Baxter; Amber J Gislason-Lee; Laura A Treadgold; Andrew G Davies
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a review of radiation effects on patients' skin and hair.

Authors:  Stephen Balter; John W Hopewell; Donald L Miller; Louis K Wagner; Michael J Zelefsky
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Fluoroscopy-induced chronic radiation skin injury: a disease perhaps often overlooked.

Authors:  Thomas H Frazier; Jeffrey B Richardson; Vilma C Fabré; Jeffrey P Callen
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2007-05

8.  Radiation cataract.

Authors:  N J Kleiman
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2012-08-22

9.  Radiation dose in neuroangiography using image noise reduction technology: a population study based on 614 patients.

Authors:  Michael Söderman; Maria Mauti; Sjirk Boon; Artur Omar; María Marteinsdóttir; Tommy Andersson; Staffan Holmin; Bart Hoornaert
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Novel X-ray image noise reduction technology reduces patient radiation dose while maintaining image quality in coronary angiography.

Authors:  T Ten Cate; M van Wely; H Gehlmann; M Mauti; C Camaro; N Reifart; H Suryapranata; M J de Boer
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.380

View more
  4 in total

1.  Radiation doses during cardiac catheterisation procedures in India: a multicentre study: Radiation dose study.

Authors:  Vijayakumar Subban; Sophie Amelot; Suma M Victor; Anil Potdar; Vishawanath Yadav; Tejas Patel; Sanjay Shah; Thomas Alexander; Balakumaran Jeyakumaran; Juno Angel; Mullasari S Ajit
Journal:  AsiaIntervention       Date:  2020-07-20

2.  Generative learning approach for radiation dose reduction in X-ray guided cardiac interventions.

Authors:  Fariba Azizmohammadi; Iñaki Navarro Castellanos; Joaquim Miró; Paul Segars; Ehsan Samei; Luc Duong
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 4.506

3.  High filtration in interventional practices reduces patient radiation doses but not always scatter radiation doses.

Authors:  Roberto M Sanchez; Eliseo Vano; Pablo Salinas; Nieves Gonzalo; Javier Escaned; Jose M Fernández
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  An augmented reality system for image guidance of transcatheter procedures for structural heart disease.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Subhi J Al'Aref; Gurpreet Singh; Alexandre Caprio; Amir Ali Amiri Moghadam; Sun-Joo Jang; S Chiu Wong; James K Min; Simon Dunham; Bobak Mosadegh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.