Literature DB >> 23089007

Radiation cataract.

N J Kleiman1.   

Abstract

Until very recently, ocular exposure guidelines were based on the assumption that radiation cataract is a deterministic event requiring threshold doses generally greater than 2 Gy. This view was, in part, based on older studies which generally had short follow-up periods, failed to take into account increasing latency as dose decreased, had relatively few subjects with doses below a few Gy, and were not designed to detect early lens changes. Newer findings, including those in populations exposed to much lower radiation doses and in subjects as diverse as astronauts, medical workers, atomic bomb survivors, accidentally exposed individuals, and those undergoing diagnostic or radiotherapeutic procedures, strongly suggest dose-related lens opacification at significantly lower doses. These observations resulted in a recent re-evaluation of current lens occupational exposure guidelines, and a proposed lowering of the presumptive radiation cataract threshold to 0.5 Gy/year and the occupational lens exposure limit to 20 mSv/year, regardless of whether received as an acute, protracted, or chronic exposure. Experimental animal studies support these conclusions and suggest a role for genotoxicity in the development of radiation cataract. Recent findings of a low or even zero threshold for radiation-induced lens opacification are likely to influence current research efforts and directions concerning the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying this pathology. Furthermore, new guidelines are likely to have significant implications for occupational and/or accidental exposure, and the need for occupational eye protection (e.g. in fields such as interventional medicine).
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23089007     DOI: 10.1016/j.icrp.2012.06.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann ICRP        ISSN: 0146-6453


  15 in total

1.  Cataract risk in US radiologic technologists assisting with fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Raquel Velazquez-Kronen; David Borrego; Ethel S Gilbert; Donald L Miller; Kirsten B Moysich; Jo L Freudenheim; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Elizabeth K Cahoon; Mark P Little; Amy E Millen; Stephen Balter; Bruce H Alexander; Steven L Simon; Martha S Linet; Cari M Kitahara
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Biological Effects of Space Radiation and Development of Effective Countermeasures.

Authors:  Ann R Kennedy
Journal:  Life Sci Space Res (Amst)       Date:  2014-04-01

3.  Eye lens dosimetry in anesthesiology: a prospective study.

Authors:  Bart Vaes; Karel Van Keer; Lara Struelens; Werner Schoonjans; Ivo Nijs; Jan Vandevenne; Sven Van Poucke
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Comprehensive assessment of patient image quality and radiation dose in latest generation cardiac x-ray equipment for percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  Amber J Gislason-Lee; Claire Keeble; Daniel Egleston; Josephine Bexon; Stephen M Kengyelics; Andrew G Davies
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-05-02

5.  Impact of latest generation cardiac interventional X-ray equipment on patient image quality and radiation dose for trans-catheter aortic valve implantations.

Authors:  Amber J Gislason-Lee; Claire Keeble; Christoper J Malkin; Daniel Egleston; Josephine Bexon; Stephen M Kengyelics; Daniel Blackman; Andrew G Davies
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Evolved Cellular Mechanisms to Respond to Genotoxic Insults: Implications for Radiation-Induced Hematologic Malignancies.

Authors:  Courtney J Fleenor; Kelly Higa; Michael M Weil; James DeGregori
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  The Risk of Cataract among Survivors of Childhood and Adolescent Cancer: A Report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Authors:  Gabriel Chodick; Alice J Sigurdson; Ruth A Kleinerman; Charles A Sklar; Wendy Leisenring; Ann C Mertens; Marilyn Stovall; Susan A Smith; Rita E Weathers; Lene H S Veiga; Leslie L Robison; Peter D Inskip
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Fitness costs of increased cataract frequency and cumulative radiation dose in natural mammalian populations from Chernobyl.

Authors:  Philipp Lehmann; Zbyszek Boratyński; Tapio Mappes; Timothy A Mousseau; Anders P Møller
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Differences in characteristics of pediatric patients undergoing computed tomography between hospitals and primary care settings: implications for assessing cancer follow-up studies.

Authors:  Gabriel Chodick; Moran Levin; Ruth A Kleinerman; Michael Shwarz; Varda Shalev; Shai Ashkenazi; Gad Horev
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2015-11-15

10.  The clinical features of radiation cataract in patients with ocular adnexal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma.

Authors:  Kanae Fukutsu; Satoru Kase; Kan Ishijima; Rumiko Kinoshita; Susumu Ishida
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.