Literature DB >> 20147386

Evaluating imaging systems: practical applications.

Magnus Båth1.   

Abstract

There are many ways in which imaging systems can be evaluated. The aim of the present paper is to provide an overview of a number of selected approaches to evaluating imaging systems, often encountered by the medical physicist, and discuss their validity and reliability. Specifically, it will cover (i) characterisation of an imaging system in terms of its detective quantum efficiency using linear-systems analysis; (ii) attempts to calculate relevant measures directly in images using the Rose model and the pixel signal-to-noise ratio; (iii) task-based methods incorporating human observers such as receiver-operating characteristics and (iv) visual grading-based methods using experienced radiologists as observers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20147386     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncq007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  13 in total

1.  Evaluation of a new system for chest tomosynthesis: aspects of image quality of different protocols determined using an anthropomorphic phantom.

Authors:  M Jadidi; A Sundin; P Aspelin; M Båth; S Nyrén
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Methods for the analysis of ordinal response data in medical image quality assessment.

Authors:  Claire Keeble; Paul D Baxter; Amber J Gislason-Lee; Laura A Treadgold; Andrew G Davies
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Development and validation of a visual grading scale for assessing image quality of AP pelvis radiographic images.

Authors:  Hussien A A B Mraity; Andrew England; Simon Cassidy; Peter Eachus; Alejandro Dominguez; Peter Hogg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Lowered dose full-spine radiography in pediatric patients with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Caroline Ernst; Nico Buls; Armand Laumen; Gert Van Gompel; Filip Verhelle; Johan de Mey
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Visual grading analysis of digital neonatal chest phantom X-ray images: Impact of detector type, dose and image processing on image quality.

Authors:  M H Smet; L Breysem; E Mussen; H Bosmans; N W Marshall; L Cockmartin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Comprehensive assessment of patient image quality and radiation dose in latest generation cardiac x-ray equipment for percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  Amber J Gislason-Lee; Claire Keeble; Daniel Egleston; Josephine Bexon; Stephen M Kengyelics; Andrew G Davies
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-05-02

7.  Paediatric cardiac CT examinations: impact of the iterative reconstruction method ASIR on image quality--preliminary findings.

Authors:  Frédéric A Miéville; François Gudinchet; Elena Rizzo; Phalla Ou; Francis Brunelle; François O Bochud; Francis R Verdun
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-06-30

8.  Dependency of image quality on acquisition protocol and image processing in chest tomosynthesis-a visual grading study based on clinical data.

Authors:  Masoud Jadidi; Magnus Båth; Sven Nyrén
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL HAND EXAMINATION ON SIX OPTIMISED DR SYSTEMS.

Authors:  Helle Precht; Claus Bjørn Outzen; Martin Weber Kusk; Malene Bisgaard; Dag Waaler
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 0.972

10.  Correlation of clinical and physical-technical image quality in chest CT: a human cadaver study applied on iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  An De Crop; Peter Smeets; Tom Van Hoof; Merel Vergauwen; Tom Dewaele; Mathias Van Borsel; Eric Achten; Koenraad Verstraete; Katharina D'Herde; Hubert Thierens; Klaus Bacher
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 1.930

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.