Guang Li1, Jie Wei2, Mo Kadbi3, Jason Moody4, August Sun4, Shirong Zhang4, Svetlana Markova4, Kristen Zakian4, Margie Hunt4, Joseph O Deasy4. 1. Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: lig2@mskcc.org. 2. Department of Computer Science, City College of New York, New York, New York. 3. Philips Healthcare, MR Therapy Cleveland, Ohio. 4. Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate a super-resolution approach to reconstruct time-resolved 4-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (TR-4DMRI) with a high spatiotemporal resolution for multi-breathing cycle motion assessment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A super-resolution approach was developed to combine fast 3-dimensional (3D) cine MRI with low resolution during free breathing (FB) and high-resolution 3D static MRI during breath hold (BH) using deformable image registration. A T1-weighted, turbo field echo sequence, coronal 3D cine acquisition, partial Fourier approximation, and SENSitivity Encoding parallel acceleration were used. The same MRI pulse sequence, field of view, and acceleration techniques were applied in both FB and BH acquisitions; the intensity-based Demons deformable image registration method was used. Under an institutional review board-approved protocol, 7 volunteers were studied with 3D cine FB scan (voxel size: 5 × 5 × 5 mm3) at 2 Hz for 40 seconds and a 3D static BH scan (2 × 2 × 2 mm3). To examine the image fidelity of 3D cine and super-resolution TR-4DMRI, a mobile gel phantom with multi-internal targets was scanned at 3 speeds and compared with the 3D static image. Image similarity among 3D cine, 4DMRI, and 3D static was evaluated visually using difference image and quantitatively using voxel intensity correlation and Dice index (phantom only). Multi-breathing-cycle waveforms were extracted and compared in both phantom and volunteer images using the 3D cine as the references. RESULTS: Mild imaging artifacts were found in the 3D cine and TR-4DMRI of the mobile gel phantom with a Dice index of >0.95. Among 7 volunteers, the super-resolution TR-4DMRI yielded high voxel-intensity correlation (0.92 ± 0.05) and low voxel-intensity difference (<0.05). The detected motion differences between TR-4DMRI and 3D cine were -0.2 ± 0.5 mm (phantom) and -0.2 ± 1.9 mm (diaphragms). CONCLUSION: Super-resolution TR-4DMRI has been reconstructed with adequate temporal (2 Hz) and spatial (2 × 2 × 2 mm3) resolutions. Further TR-4DMRI characterization and improvement are necessary before clinical applications. Multi-breathing cycles can be examined, providing patient-specific breathing irregularities and motion statistics for future 4D radiation therapy.
PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate a super-resolution approach to reconstruct time-resolved 4-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (TR-4DMRI) with a high spatiotemporal resolution for multi-breathing cycle motion assessment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A super-resolution approach was developed to combine fast 3-dimensional (3D) cine MRI with low resolution during free breathing (FB) and high-resolution 3D static MRI during breath hold (BH) using deformable image registration. A T1-weighted, turbo field echo sequence, coronal 3D cine acquisition, partial Fourier approximation, and SENSitivity Encoding parallel acceleration were used. The same MRI pulse sequence, field of view, and acceleration techniques were applied in both FB and BH acquisitions; the intensity-based Demons deformable image registration method was used. Under an institutional review board-approved protocol, 7 volunteers were studied with 3D cine FB scan (voxel size: 5 × 5 × 5 mm3) at 2 Hz for 40 seconds and a 3D static BH scan (2 × 2 × 2 mm3). To examine the image fidelity of 3D cine and super-resolution TR-4DMRI, a mobile gel phantom with multi-internal targets was scanned at 3 speeds and compared with the 3D static image. Image similarity among 3D cine, 4DMRI, and 3D static was evaluated visually using difference image and quantitatively using voxel intensity correlation and Dice index (phantom only). Multi-breathing-cycle waveforms were extracted and compared in both phantom and volunteer images using the 3D cine as the references. RESULTS: Mild imaging artifacts were found in the 3D cine and TR-4DMRI of the mobile gel phantom with a Dice index of >0.95. Among 7 volunteers, the super-resolution TR-4DMRI yielded high voxel-intensity correlation (0.92 ± 0.05) and low voxel-intensity difference (<0.05). The detected motion differences between TR-4DMRI and 3D cine were -0.2 ± 0.5 mm (phantom) and -0.2 ± 1.9 mm (diaphragms). CONCLUSION: Super-resolution TR-4DMRI has been reconstructed with adequate temporal (2 Hz) and spatial (2 × 2 × 2 mm3) resolutions. Further TR-4DMRI characterization and improvement are necessary before clinical applications. Multi-breathing cycles can be examined, providing patient-specific breathing irregularities and motion statistics for future 4D radiation therapy.
Authors: Gabriele M Beck; Jan De Becker; Alun C Jones; Marcus von Falkenhausen; Winfried A Willinek; Jürgen Gieseke Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Erik Tryggestad; Aaron Flammang; Sarah Han-Oh; Russell Hales; Joseph Herman; Todd McNutt; Teboh Roland; Steven M Shea; John Wong Journal: Med Phys Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Bjorn Stemkens; Rob H N Tijssen; Baudouin Denis de Senneville; Jan J W Lagendijk; Cornelis A T van den Berg Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2016-06-30 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Erik Tryggestad; Aaron Flammang; Russell Hales; Joseph Herman; Junghoon Lee; Todd McNutt; Teboh Roland; Steven M Shea; John Wong Journal: Med Phys Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: He Wang; Lei Dong; Jennifer O'Daniel; Radhe Mohan; Adam S Garden; K Kian Ang; Deborah A Kuban; Mark Bonnen; Joe Y Chang; Rex Cheung Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2005-06-01 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Joshua N Freedman; David J Collins; Oliver J Gurney-Champion; Jamie R McClelland; Simeon Nill; Uwe Oelfke; Martin O Leach; Andreas Wetscherek Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2018-06-02 Impact factor: 6.280