Literature DB >> 18504734

Contrast-enhanced timing robust acquisition order with a preparation of the longitudinal signal component (CENTRA plus) for 3D contrast-enhanced abdominal imaging.

Gabriele M Beck1, Jan De Becker, Alun C Jones, Marcus von Falkenhausen, Winfried A Willinek, Jürgen Gieseke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate a new image acquisition method that enables an accurate hepatic arterial phase definition and the visualization of contrast agent uptake processes in abdominal organs like liver, spleen, and pancreas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 3D turbo gradient echo method where a fat suppression prepulse is followed by the acquisition of several profiles was combined with an elliptical centric k-space ordering technique and 3D dynamic elliptical centric keyhole. The new k-space ordering method (CENTRA+) was validated experimentally. In an initial clinical evaluation phase the method was employed in five patients to assess the accuracy of the hepatic arterial phase definition and the visualization of the contrast uptake processes in dynamic scanning in abdominal organs like liver, spleen, and pancreas.
RESULTS: In total, five patients were evaluated using the new k-space order. Our initial results indicate that the new k-space order allows consistent capture of the hepatic arterial phase. In dynamic scanning the extreme short temporal resolution obtained with 3D elliptical centric keyhole enables contrast enhancement to be followed in organs with fast contrast uptake characteristics.
CONCLUSION: The elliptical centric nature of the new image acquisition method effectively allows capture of the contrast enhancement processes with good fat suppression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18504734     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  11 in total

Review 1.  [Modern magnetic resonance imaging of the liver].

Authors:  D M Hedderich; K Weiss; D Maintz; T Persigehl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Can microvessel invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma be predicted by pre-operative MRI?

Authors:  Honsoul Kim; Mi-Suk Park; Jin Young Choi; Young Nyun Park; Myeong-Jin Kim; Kyung Sik Kim; Jin Sub Choi; Kwang-Hyub Han; EunJu Kim; Ki Whang Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  CT and MR perfusion techniques to assess diffuse liver disease.

Authors:  Maxime Ronot; Benjamin Leporq; Bernard E Van Beers; Valérie Vilgrain
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11

4.  3D late gadolinium enhanced cardiovascular MR with CENTRA-PLUS profile/view ordering: Feasibility of right ventricular myocardial damage assessment using a swine animal model.

Authors:  Keigo Kawaji; Akiko Tanaka; Mita B Patel; Hui Wang; Francesco Maffessanti; Takeyoshi Ota; Amit R Patel
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: New imaging strategies for evaluating focal liver lesions.

Authors:  Kenneth Coenegrachts
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-31

6.  Novel Super-Resolution Approach to Time-Resolved Volumetric 4-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging With High Spatiotemporal Resolution for Multi-Breathing Cycle Motion Assessment.

Authors:  Guang Li; Jie Wei; Mo Kadbi; Jason Moody; August Sun; Shirong Zhang; Svetlana Markova; Kristen Zakian; Margie Hunt; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Liver perfusion in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI): comparison of enhancement in Gd-BT-DO3A and Gd-EOB-DTPA in normal liver parenchyma.

Authors:  Hanke J Schalkx; Marijn van Stralen; Kenneth Coenegrachts; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Charlotte S van Kessel; Richard van Hillegersberg; Karel J van Erpecum; Helena M Verkooijen; Josien P W Pluim; Wouter B Veldhuis; Maarten S van Leeuwen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Artifacts during the arterial phase of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI: Multiple arterial phases using view-sharing from two different vendors versus single arterial phase imaging.

Authors:  Ji Hye Min; Young Kon Kim; Tae Wook Kang; Woo Kyoung Jeong; Won Jae Lee; Soohyun Ahn; Na Young Hwang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Triple Arterial Phase MR Imaging with Gadoxetic Acid Using a Combination of Contrast Enhanced Time Robust Angiography, Keyhole, and Viewsharing Techniques and Two-Dimensional Parallel Imaging in Comparison with Conventional Single Arterial Phase.

Authors:  Jeong Hee Yoon; Jeong Min Lee; Mi Hye Yu; Eun Ju Kim; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 10.  Quantitative imaging biomarkers alliance (QIBA) recommendations for improved precision of DWI and DCE-MRI derived biomarkers in multicenter oncology trials.

Authors:  Amita Shukla-Dave; Nancy A Obuchowski; Thomas L Chenevert; Sachin Jambawalikar; Lawrence H Schwartz; Dariya Malyarenko; Wei Huang; Susan M Noworolski; Robert J Young; Mark S Shiroishi; Harrison Kim; Catherine Coolens; Hendrik Laue; Caroline Chung; Mark Rosen; Michael Boss; Edward F Jackson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 5.119

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.