| Literature DB >> 28373980 |
W Maurer-Ertl1, D Pranckh-Matzke1, J Friesenbichler1, G Bratschitsch1, L A Holzer1, M Maier1, A Leithner1.
Abstract
Background. Increased metal ion levels following total hip arthroplasty (THA) with metal-on-metal bearings are a highly debated topic. Local soft tissue reactions with chronic pain and systemic side effects such as neuropathy are described. The aim of the current study was to determine the serum metal ion concentrations of Cobalt (Co) and Chrome (Cr) after THA with a ceramic-on-metal (CoM) bearing. Patients and Methods. Between 2008 and 2010, 20 patients underwent THA using a CoM bearing. Clinical function was evaluated by standardized scores systems (Harris Hip Score and WOMAC Score) and radiological examination included X-rays. Patient's blood samples were obtained for metal ion analysis and correlation analysis was done between these results and implant position. Results. Overall, 13 patients with 14 CoM devices were available for the current series. The mean age at time of surgery was 61 years (range, 41 to 85). The postoperative follow-up ranged from 49 to 68 months (mean, 58). Metal ion determination showed mean concentrations of 3,1 µg/L (range, 0,3-15,2 µg/L) for Co and 1,6 µg/L (range, 0,1-5,5 µg/L) for Cr, respectively. A correlation between cup anteversion and Co and Cr concentrations was shown. Conclusion. The current series showed increments for Co and Cr following CoM THA. However, these levels are lower compared to metal ion concentrations in patients with metal-on-metal bearings and the international accepted threshold for revision of MoM devices. We recommend routine follow-up including at least one obligatory evaluation of serum metal ion concentrations and an MRI once to exclude local soft tissue reactions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28373980 PMCID: PMC5360942 DOI: 10.1155/2017/3726029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Results of clinical and radiological assessment, as well as serum metal ion determination.
| mean | median | min | max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CoM ( | ||||
| Co ( | 3,1 | 1,1 | 0,3 | 15,2 |
| Cr ( | 1,6 | 0,9 | 0,1 | 5,5 |
| Creatinine ( | 0,9 | 0,9 | 0,5 | 1,7 |
| CRP (mg/dL) | 4,6 | 3,5 | 0,7 | 19,5 |
| Cup inclination (°) | 43 | 42 | 35 | 61 |
| Cup anteversion (°) | 11 | 11 | 6 | 16 |
| Arc of cover (mm) | 14,3 | 14,7 | 9,3 | 16,8 |
| HHS | 81 | 88 | 37 | 99 |
| WOMAC | 44 | 23 | 0 | 136 |
| Controls ( | ||||
| Co ( | 0,01 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,03 |
| Cr ( | 0,03 | 0,02 | 0,01 | 0,05 |
Figure 1It is showing a dot plot of cup position. Patients with low inclination and low anteversion angles but high elevated Co and Cr values are indicated by the red and orange arrows. The implant positions of the patient with bilateral THA with low inclination and low anteversion angles but normal metal ion concentrations are indicated by the blue and green arrows.
Figure 2Dot plot of Co and Cr concentrations following CoM THA at a mean follow-up of 58 months.
Figure 3Box plot showing the serum metal ion concentrations measured in the preoperative population and following CoM THA. The Co and Cr levels were significantly higher in the CoM THA group (p < 0.001). ⋆ refers to the two patients with highly increased Co and Cr values in the CoM THA group.
Metal ion concentrations, revision rates, and time of follow-up of several studies reporting their results following MoM and CoM THA.
| Study | Revision rate (%) | Metal ion concentrations ( | Follow-up (months) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Co | Cr | |||
| Large diameter MoM | ||||
| Hug et al. [ | 13 | 14 (0–150) | 5 (0–87) | 36 (12–61) |
| Langton et al. [ | 6 | 3.26 (1.1–32) | 3.71 (2.4–22) | 41 (10–57) |
| Lavigne et al. [ | 0 | 1.78 (0.32–7.59) | 1.78 (0.24–6.20) | 24 |
| Reito et al. [ | 36 | Unilateral: 4.2 (0.3–191.7) | Unilateral: 2.1 (0.4–115) | — |
| Maurer-Ertl et al. [ | 32 | 20.1 (0.3–190.5) | 12.8 (1.0–89.8) | 78 (20–98) |
| Engh et al. [ | 3 | 1.01 | 0.95 | 60 |
| Schouten et al. [ | — | 1.57 | 1.73 | 12 |
| Lainiala et al. [ | — | 3.3 (0.3–191.7) | 1.9 (0.4–114.8) | 3.4 years (0.6–6.5) |
| MoM resurfacing | ||||
| Hug et al. [ | 12 | 12 (0–126) | 7 (0–60) | 54 (12–74) |
| Langton et al. [ | 3.2 | 2.74 (0.4–271) | 4.16 (1.5–69.8) | 35 (8–57) |
| Langton et al. [ | 1.3 | 1.89 (0.4–228.0) | 3.61 (0.6–115.0) | 26 (13–44) |
| Reito et al. [ | 30 | Unilateral: 2.3 (0.7–217.7) | Unilateral: 2.0 (0.8–94) | — |
| Maurer-Ertl et al. [ | 30 | 16.0 (0–171.8) | 13.1 (0.31–125.0) | 86 (68–109) |
| Lainiala et al. [ | — | 1.3 (0.5–224.7) | 1.6 (6.4–13.1) | 4 years (1–6.8) |
| CoM THA | ||||
| Engh et al. [ | 1.5 | 0.85 | 1.13 | 60 |
| Schouten et al. [ | — | 1.77 | 1.84 | 12 |
| Hill et al. [ | 3.1 | 0.83 (0.24–27.56) | 0.78 (0.21–8.84) | 34 (23–45) |
| Yi et al. [ | 0 | 2.82 (±1.94) | 2.41 (±1.41) | 50 |
| Kazi et al. [ | — | 1.37 (0.12–10.68) | 1.09 (0.00–5.51) | 24 |
| Isaac et al. [ | — | 0.72 | 0.43 | 12 |
| Cadossi et al. [ | — | 0.78 (0.14–1.67) | 0.97 (0.11–2.61) | 36 |
| Joyce et al. [ | 10.7 | — | — | 18 |
| Current series | 7 | 3.1 (0.3–15.2) | 1.6 (0.1–5.5) | 58 (49–68) |