Literature DB >> 18924077

Cup inclination angle of greater than 50 degrees increases whole blood concentrations of cobalt and chromium ions after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

A J Hart1, P Buddhdev, P Winship, N Faria, J J Powell, J A Skinner.   

Abstract

A cup inclination angle greater than 45 degrees is associated with increased wear rates of metal on polyethylene (MOP) hip replacements. The same maybe true for metal on metal (MOM) hips yet this has not been clearly shown. We measured the acetabular inclination angle from plain radiographs, and whole blood metal ion levels using Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry of 26 patients (mean Harris Hip Score 94 and mean time post op of 22 months) with Birmingham Hip Resurfacings. We identified a threshold level of 50 degrees cup inclination. Below this threshold, the mean whole blood cobalt and chromium were 1.6 ppb and 1.88 ppb respectively; above this threshold, the mean blood cobalt and chromium were 4.45 ppb and 4.3 ppb respectively. These differences were significant cobalt (p<0.01) and chromium (p=0.01). All patients above the threshold had metal levels greater than any of the patients below the threshold. For 14 patients, who returned one year later for a repeat blood metal level measurement, cobalt and chromium levels were very similar. The effect of an acetabular inclination angle of greater than 50 degrees on wear rates of MOM hips, as measured through blood metal ion levels, appears to be similar to that seen with MOP hips. Additionally, our new analytical methods may allow blood metal levels to be used as a realistic biomarker of in vivo wear rate of MOM hips. The implication is that metal levels can be minimised with optimal orientation of the acetabular component.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18924077     DOI: 10.1177/112070000801800304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hip Int        ISSN: 1120-7000            Impact factor:   1.756


  35 in total

1.  Biotribological study of large diameter ceramic-on-CFR-PEEK hip joint including fluid uptake, wear and frictional heating.

Authors:  Qian Qian Wang; Jun Jie Wu; Anthony Unsworth; Adam Briscoe; Marcus Jarman-Smith; Conor Lowry; David Simpson; Simon Collins
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Hip resurfacing revision rates: radiological audit of risk factors.

Authors:  N Ramisetty; K M Krishnan; P F Partington
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Intraoperative radiographs for placing acetabular components in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas P Gross; Fei Liu; Lee Webb
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Comparison between component designs with different femoral head size in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty; multicenter randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Wataru Ando; Kengo Yamamoto; Takashi Atsumi; Satoshi Tamaoki; Kazuhiro Oinuma; Hideaki Shiratsuchi; Hirohiko Tokunaga; Yutaka Inaba; Naomi Kobayashi; Masaharu Aihara; Kenji Ohzono
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-06-10

5.  Surgical variables influence metal ion levels after hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Nicholas M Desy; Stephane G Bergeron; Alain Petit; Olga L Huk; John Antoniou
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Surgical management of hip osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Rajiv Gandhi; Anthony V Perruccio; Nizar N Mahomed
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  The learning curve for adopting hip resurfacing among hip specialists.

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Jinjun Zhu; Peter J Brooks; C Anderson Engh; Stephen J Raterman; John S Rogerson; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Radiology of the resurfaced hip.

Authors:  Luthfur Rahman; Margaret Hall-Craggs; Sarah K Muirhead-Allwood
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Medium term review of the ASR implant system: A single surgeon series.

Authors:  M Curtin; E Murphy; C Bryan; D Jadaan; M Jadaan; D Bergin; C G Murphy; W Curtin
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-02-03

10.  Are component positioning and prosthesis size associated with hip resurfacing failure?

Authors:  David R Marker; Michael G Zywiel; Aaron J Johnson; Thorsten M Seyler; Michael A Mont
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.