Literature DB >> 28372135

Spatial release from masking based on binaural processing for up to six maskers.

William A Yost1.   

Abstract

Spatial Release from Masking (SRM) was measured for identification of a female target word spoken in the presence of male masker words. Target words from a single loudspeaker located at midline were presented when two, four, or six masker words were presented either from the same source as the target or from spatially separated masker sources. All masker words were presented from loudspeakers located symmetrically around the centered target source in the front azimuth hemifield. Three masking conditions were employed: speech-in-speech masking (involving both informational and energetic masking), speech-in-noise masking (involving energetic masking), and filtered speech-in-filtered speech masking (involving informational masking). Psychophysical results were summarized as three-point psychometric functions relating proportion of correct word identification to target-to-masker ratio (in decibels) for both the co-located and spatially separated target and masker sources cases. SRM was then calculated by comparing the slopes and intercepts of these functions. SRM decreased as the number of symmetrically placed masker sources increased from two to six. This decrease was independent of the type of masking, with almost no SRM measured for six masker sources. These results suggest that when SRM is dependent primarily on binaural processing, SRM is effectively limited to fewer than six sound sources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28372135      PMCID: PMC5848840          DOI: 10.1121/1.4978614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  22 in total

1.  Localization of multiple sound sources with two microphones.

Authors:  C Liu; B C Wheeler; W D O'Brien; R C Bilger; C R Lansing; A S Feng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech.

Authors:  Tanya L Arbogast; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The information-divergence hypothesis of informational masking.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Lynn Gilbertson; Inseok Heo; An-Chieh Chang; Jacob Stamas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Object-based auditory and visual attention.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  A cocktail party model of spatial release from masking by both noise and speech interferers.

Authors:  Gary L Jones; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Localizing the sources of two independent noises: role of time varying amplitude differences.

Authors:  William A Yost; Christopher A Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Discrimination and identification of azimuth using spectral shape.

Authors:  Daniel E Shub; Suzanne P Carr; Yunmi Kong; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  A model that predicts the binaural advantage to speech intelligibility from the mixed target and interferer signals.

Authors:  Stefano Cosentino; Torsten Marquardt; David McAlpine; John F Culling; Tiago H Falk
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Spatial release from energetic and informational masking in a selective speech identification task.

Authors:  Antje Ihlefeld; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.482

10.  Monaural level discrimination under dichotic conditions.

Authors:  Daniel E Shub; Nathaniel I Durlach; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.482

View more
  13 in total

1.  Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Virginia Best; Elin Roverud; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Todd Jennings; Kameron Clayton; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Discrimination of changes in spatial configuration for multiple, simultaneously presented sounds.

Authors:  William A Yost; M Torben Pastore; Yi Zhou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory motion as a cue for source segregation and selection in a "cocktail party" listening environment.

Authors:  Adrian Y Cho; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.482

4.  Molecular analysis of individual differences in talker search at the cocktail-party.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Torben Pastore; Briana Rodriguez; William A Yost; Jungmee Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.482

5.  Comparing Spatial Release From Masking Using Traditional Methods and Portable Automated Rapid Testing iPad App.

Authors:  Nirmal Kumar Srinivasan; Allison Holtz; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 1.493

6.  Spatial Release from Masking with a Moving Target.

Authors:  M Torben Pastore; William A Yost
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-12-20

7.  Interactions between egocentric and allocentric spatial coding of sounds revealed by a multisensory learning paradigm.

Authors:  Giuseppe Rabini; Elena Altobelli; Francesco Pavani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Responses of neurons in the rat's inferior colliculus to a sound are affected by another sound in a space-dependent manner.

Authors:  Mathiang G Chot; Sarah Tran; Huiming Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The effects of auditory spatial training on informational masking release in elderly listeners: a study protocol for a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Farnoush Jarollahi; Marzieh Amiri; Shohreh Jalaie; Seyyed Jalal Sameni
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-04-09

10.  Tinnitus impairs segregation of competing speech in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Yang Wenyi Liu; Bing Wang; Bing Chen; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.