Literature DB >> 30710924

Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

Gerald Kidd1, Christine R Mason1, Virginia Best1, Elin Roverud1, Jayaganesh Swaminathan1, Todd Jennings1, Kameron Clayton1, H Steven Colburn2.   

Abstract

The ability to identify the words spoken by one talker masked by two or four competing talkers was tested in young-adult listeners with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). In a reference/baseline condition, masking speech was colocated with target speech, target and masker talkers were female, and the masker was intelligible. Three comparison conditions included replacing female masker talkers with males, time-reversal of masker speech, and spatial separation of sources. All three variables produced significant release from masking. To emulate energetic masking (EM), stimuli were subjected to ideal time-frequency segregation retaining only the time-frequency units where target energy exceeded masker energy. Subjects were then tested with these resynthesized "glimpsed stimuli." For either two or four maskers, thresholds only varied about 3 dB across conditions suggesting that EM was roughly equal. Compared to normal-hearing listeners from an earlier study [Kidd, Mason, Swaminathan, Roverud, Clayton, and Best, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 140, 132-144 (2016)], SNHL listeners demonstrated both greater energetic and informational masking as well as higher glimpsed thresholds. Individual differences were correlated across masking release conditions suggesting that listeners could be categorized according to their general ability to solve the task. Overall, both peripheral and central factors appear to contribute to the higher thresholds for SNHL listeners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30710924      PMCID: PMC6347574          DOI: 10.1121/1.5087555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  54 in total

1.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers.

Authors:  D S Brungart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers.

Authors:  D S Brungart; B D Simpson; M A Ericson; K R Scott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Similarity, uncertainty, and masking in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Tanya L Arbogast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Informational masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Tanya L Arbogast; Christine R Mason; Michael Walsh
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-06

5.  Note on informational masking.

Authors:  Nathaniel I Durlach; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd; Tanya L Arbogast; H Steven Colburn; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Informational masking: counteracting the effects of stimulus uncertainty by decreasing target-masker similarity.

Authors:  Nathaniel I Durlach; Christine R Mason; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Tanya L Arbogast; H Steven Colburn; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Uma Balakrishnan; Karen S Helfer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Tanya L Arbogast; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Hearing loss and perceptual effort: downstream effects on older adults' memory for speech.

Authors:  Sandra L McCoy; Patricia A Tun; L Clarke Cox; Marianne Colangelo; Raj A Stewart; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2005-01

10.  The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).

Authors:  Stuart Gatehouse; William Noble
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  13 in total

1.  Enhancing the perceptual segregation and localization of sound sources with a triple beamformer.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Todd R Jennings; Andrew J Byrne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The effect of fundamental frequency contour similarity on multi-talker listening in older and younger adults.

Authors:  Peter A Wasiuk; Mathieu Lavandier; Emily Buss; Jacob Oleson; Lauren Calandruccio
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The importance of processing resolution in "ideal time-frequency segregation" of masked speech and the implications for predicting speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Christopher Conroy; Virginia Best; Todd R Jennings; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The effects of target-masker sex mismatch on linguistic release from masking.

Authors:  Brittany T Williams; Navin Viswanathan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Can background noise increase the informational masking in a speech mixture?

Authors:  Virginia Best; Christopher Conroy; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Binaural sensitivity and release from speech-on-speech masking in listeners with and without hearing loss.

Authors:  Lucas S Baltzell; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Adrian Y Cho; Mathieu Lavandier; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Benefits of triple acoustic beamforming during speech-on-speech masking and sound localization for bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  David Yun; Todd R Jennings; Gerald Kidd; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Older Listeners' Perception of Speech With Strengthened and Weakened Dynamic Pitch Cues in Background Noise.

Authors:  Jing Shen
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Influence of Three Auditory Profiles on Aided Speech Perception in Different Noise Scenarios.

Authors:  Mengfan Wu; Oscar M Cañete; Jesper Hvass Schmidt; Michal Fereczkowski; Tobias Neher
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Effect of Masker Head Orientation, Listener Age, and Extended High-Frequency Sensitivity on Speech Recognition in Spatially Separated Speech.

Authors:  Meredith D Braza; Nicole E Corbin; Emily Buss; Brian B Monson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.