Literature DB >> 23967946

The information-divergence hypothesis of informational masking.

Robert A Lutfi1, Lynn Gilbertson, Inseok Heo, An-Chieh Chang, Jacob Stamas.   

Abstract

In recent years there has been growing interest in masking that cannot be attributed to interactions in the cochlea-so--called informational masking (IM). Similarity in the acoustic properties of target and masker and uncertainty regarding the masker are the two major factors identified with IM. These factors involve quite different manipulations of signals and are believed to entail fundamentally different processes resulting in IM. Here, however, evidence is presented that these factors affect IM through their mutual influence on a single factor-the information divergence of target and masker given by Simpson-Fitter's da [Lutfi et al. (2012). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132, EL109-113]. Four experiments are described involving multitone pattern discrimination, multi-talker word recognition, sound-source identification, and sound localization. In each case standard manipulations of masker uncertainty and target-masker similarity (including the covariation of target-masker frequencies) are found to have the same effect on performance provided they produce the same change in da. The function relating d(') performance to da, moreover, appears to be linear with constant slope across listeners. The overriding dependence of IM on da is taken to reflect a general principle of perception that exploits differences in the statistical structure of signals to separate figure from ground.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23967946      PMCID: PMC3765281          DOI: 10.1121/1.4817875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  46 in total

1.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers.

Authors:  D S Brungart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Informational masking by everyday sounds.

Authors:  E L Oh; R A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech.

Authors:  R L Freyman; K S Helfer; D D McCall; R K Clifton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Auditory and visual objects.

Authors:  M Kubovy; D Van Valkenburg
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2001-06

5.  Similarity, uncertainty, and masking in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Tanya L Arbogast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effect of masker harmonicity on informational masking.

Authors:  E L Oh; R A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons.

Authors:  Nachum Ulanovsky; Liora Las; Israel Nelken
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Within-ear and across-ear interference in a dichotic cocktail party listening task: effects of masker uncertainty.

Authors:  Douglas S Brungart; Brian D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Note on informational masking.

Authors:  Nathaniel I Durlach; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd; Tanya L Arbogast; H Steven Colburn; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Informational masking: counteracting the effects of stimulus uncertainty by decreasing target-masker similarity.

Authors:  Nathaniel I Durlach; Christine R Mason; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Tanya L Arbogast; H Steven Colburn; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  13 in total

1.  Auditory streaming of tones of uncertain frequency, level, and duration.

Authors:  An-Chieh Chang; Robert A Lutfi; Jungmee Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A test of model classes accounting for individual differences in the cocktail-party effect.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Briana Rodriguez; Jungmee Lee; Torben Pastore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Spatial release from masking based on binaural processing for up to six maskers.

Authors:  William A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Informational masking of negative masking.

Authors:  Christopher Conroy; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Molecular analysis of individual differences in talker search at the cocktail-party.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Torben Pastore; Briana Rodriguez; William A Yost; Jungmee Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.482

6.  Spatial release from informational masking enhances the early cortical representation of speech sounds.

Authors:  Benjamin H Zobel; Richard L Freyman; Lisa D Sanders
Journal:  Audit Percept Cogn       Date:  2022-06-14

7.  Additivity of segregation cues in simulated cocktail-party listening.

Authors:  Briana Rodriguez; Jungmee Lee; Robert Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  The cocktail-party problem revisited: early processing and selection of multi-talker speech.

Authors:  Adelbert W Bronkhorst
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Informational Masking in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners Measured in a Nonspeech Pattern Identification Task.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Virginia Best; Christine R Mason; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  A Detection-Theoretic Analysis of Auditory Streaming and Its Relation to Auditory Masking.

Authors:  An-Chieh Chang; Robert Lutfi; Jungmee Lee; Inseok Heo
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-09-18       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.