Literature DB >> 36182296

Auditory motion as a cue for source segregation and selection in a "cocktail party" listening environment.

Adrian Y Cho1, Gerald Kidd2.   

Abstract

Source motion was examined as a cue for segregating concurrent speech or noise sources. In two different headphone-based tasks-motion detection (MD) and speech-on-speech masking (SI)-one source among three was designated as the target only by imposing sinusoidal variation in azimuth during the stimulus presentation. For MD, the lstener was asked which of the three concurrent sources was in motion during the trial. For SI, the listener was asked to report the words spoken by the moving speech source. MD performance improved as the amplitude of the sinusoidal motion (i.e., displacement in azimuth) increased over the range of values tested (±5° to ±30°) for both modulated noise and speech targets, with better performance found for speech. SI performance also improved as the amplitude of target motion increased. Furthermore, SI performance improved as word position progressed throughout the sentence. Performance on the MD task was correlated with performance on SI task across individual subjects. For the SI conditions tested here, these findings are consistent with the proposition that listeners first detect the moving target source, then focus attention on the target location as the target sentence unfolds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36182296      PMCID: PMC9489258          DOI: 10.1121/10.0013990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   2.482


  41 in total

1.  The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech.

Authors:  R L Freyman; K S Helfer; D D McCall; R K Clifton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spatial and temporal factors in auditory saltation.

Authors:  D P Phillips; S E Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Motion onset captures attention.

Authors:  Richard A Abrams; Shawn E Christ
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-09

4.  A simulated "cocktail party" with up to three sound sources.

Authors:  W A Yost; R H Dye; S Sheft
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-10

5.  Spatial release from masking based on binaural processing for up to six maskers.

Authors:  William A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Switching Streams Across Ears to Evaluate Informational Masking of Speech-on-Speech.

Authors:  Axelle Calcus; Tim Schoof; Stuart Rosen; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; Pamela Souza
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Frequency-response characteristic of auditory observers detecting signals of a single frequency in noise: the probe-signal method.

Authors:  G Z Greenberg; W D Larkin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Detectability of varying interaural temporal differences.

Authors:  D W Grantham; F L Wightman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Elin Roverud; Kameron K Clayton; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Interactions among talker sex, masker number, and masker intelligibility in speech-on-speech recognition.

Authors:  Mathew Thomas; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  JASA Express Lett       Date:  2021-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.