Literature DB >> 18537388

Spatial release from energetic and informational masking in a selective speech identification task.

Antje Ihlefeld1, Barbara Shinn-Cunningham.   

Abstract

A masker can reduce target intelligibility both by interfering with the target's peripheral representation ("energetic masking") and/or by causing more central interference ("informational masking"). Intelligibility generally improves with increasing spatial separation between two sources, an effect known as spatial release from masking (SRM). Here, SRM was measured using two concurrent sine-vocoded talkers. Target and masker were each composed of eight different narrowbands of speech (with little spectral overlap). The broadband target-to-masker energy ratio (TMR) was varied, and response errors were used to assess the relative importance of energetic and informational masking. Performance improved with increasing TMR. SRM occurred at all TMRs; however, the pattern of errors suggests that spatial separation affected performance differently, depending on the dominant type of masking. Detailed error analysis suggests that informational masking occurred due to failures in either across-time linkage of target segments (streaming) or top-down selection of the target. Specifically, differences in the spatial cues in target and masker improved streaming and target selection. In contrast, level differences helped listeners select the target, but had little influence on streaming. These results demonstrate that at least two mechanisms (differentially affected by spatial and level cues) influence informational masking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18537388      PMCID: PMC9014252          DOI: 10.1121/1.2904826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   2.482


  42 in total

1.  Evaluation of speech intelligibility with the coordinate response measure.

Authors:  D S Brungart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition.

Authors:  R L Freyman; U Balakrishnan; K S Helfer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length changes on attention to one of two simultaneous talkers.

Authors:  Christopher J Darwin; Douglas S Brungart; Brian D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Within-ear and across-ear interference in a dichotic cocktail party listening task: effects of masker uncertainty.

Authors:  Douglas S Brungart; Brian D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Uma Balakrishnan; Karen S Helfer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Localizing nearby sound sources in a classroom: binaural room impulse responses.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Norbert Kopco; Tara J Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The advantage of knowing where to listen.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Tanya L Arbogast; Christine R Mason; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Auditory grouping.

Authors:  C J Darwin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Perceptual segregation of a harmonic from a vowel by interaural time difference in conjunction with mistuning and onset asynchrony.

Authors:  C J Darwin; R W Hukin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Spatial release from energetic and informational masking in a divided speech identification task.

Authors:  Antje Ihlefeld; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  35 in total

1.  Effects of the rate of formant-frequency variation on the grouping of formants in speech perception.

Authors:  Robert J Summers; Peter J Bailey; Brian Roberts
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-13

2.  Influence of task-relevant and task-irrelevant feature continuity on selective auditory attention.

Authors:  Ross K Maddox; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-11-29

3.  Spatial cues alone produce inaccurate sound segregation: the effect of interaural time differences.

Authors:  Andrew Schwartz; Josh H McDermott; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The Spatial Release of Cognitive Load in Cocktail Party Is Determined by the Relative Levels of the Talkers.

Authors:  Guillaume Andéol; Clara Suied; Sébastien Scannella; Frédéric Dehais
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-01-18

5.  Spatial release from masking based on binaural processing for up to six maskers.

Authors:  William A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Auditory spatial attention representations in the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Lingqiang Kong; Samantha W Michalka; Maya L Rosen; Summer L Sheremata; Jascha D Swisher; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; David C Somers
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Stream segregation with high spatial acuity.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks; Zekiye A Onsan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effects of dynamic range compression on spatial selective auditory attention in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Andrew H Schwartz; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Informational masking and spatial hearing in listeners with and without unilateral hearing loss.

Authors:  Ann M Rothpletz; Frederic L Wightman; Doris J Kistler
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  The importance of processing resolution in "ideal time-frequency segregation" of masked speech and the implications for predicting speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Christopher Conroy; Virginia Best; Todd R Jennings; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.