Literature DB >> 21895087

A cocktail party model of spatial release from masking by both noise and speech interferers.

Gary L Jones1, Ruth Y Litovsky.   

Abstract

A mathematical formula for estimating spatial release from masking (SRM) in a cocktail party environment would be useful as a simpler alternative to computationally intensive algorithms and may enhance understanding of underlying mechanisms. The experiment presented herein was designed to provide a strong test of a model that divides SRM into contributions of asymmetry and angular separation [Bronkhorst (2000). Acustica 86, 117-128] and to examine whether that model can be extended to include speech maskers. Across masker types the contribution to SRM of angular separation of maskers from the target was found to grow at a diminishing rate as angular separation increased within the frontal hemifield, contrary to predictions of the model. Speech maskers differed from noise maskers in the overall magnitude of SRM and in the contribution of angular separation (both greater for speech). These results were used to develop a modified model that achieved good fits to data for noise maskers (ρ=0.93) and for speech maskers (ρ=0.94) while using the same functions to describe separation and asymmetry components of SRM for both masker types. These findings suggest that this approach can be used to accurately model SRM for speech maskers in addition to primarily "energetic" noise maskers.
© 2011 Acoustical Society of America

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21895087      PMCID: PMC3188967          DOI: 10.1121/1.3613928

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  35 in total

1.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers.

Authors:  D S Brungart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling.

Authors:  F A Wichmann; N J Hill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

3.  The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit.

Authors:  F A Wichmann; N J Hill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

4.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers.

Authors:  D S Brungart; B D Simpson; M A Ericson; K R Scott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech.

Authors:  Tanya L Arbogast; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of reverberation on perceptual segregation of competing voices.

Authors:  John F Culling; Kathryn I Hodder; Chaz Yee Toh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Hearing speech against spatially separate competing speech versus competing noise.

Authors:  William Noble; Stephen Perrett
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-11

8.  Note on informational masking.

Authors:  Nathaniel I Durlach; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd; Tanya L Arbogast; H Steven Colburn; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Revision, extension, and evaluation of a binaural speech intelligibility model.

Authors:  Rainer Beutelmann; Thomas Brand; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Revision and validation of a binaural model for speech intelligibility in noise.

Authors:  Sam Jelfs; John F Culling; Mathieu Lavandier
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  18 in total

1.  Spatial release from masking in children with normal hearing and with bilateral cochlear implants: effect of interferer asymmetry.

Authors:  Sara M Misurelli; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spatial release from masking in children with bilateral cochlear implants and with normal hearing: Effect of target-interferer similarity.

Authors:  Sara M Misurelli; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Investigating long-term effects of cochlear implantation in single-sided deafness: a best practice model for longitudinal assessment of spatial hearing abilities and tinnitus handicap.

Authors:  Brian C Gartrell; Heath G Jones; Alan Kan; Melanie Buhr-Lawler; Samuel P Gubbels; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Spatial release from masking based on binaural processing for up to six maskers.

Authors:  William A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Christine R Mason; Timothy M Streeter; Virginia Best; Elin Roverud; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Binaural Glimpses at the Cocktail Party?

Authors:  Andrea Lingner; Benedikt Grothe; Lutz Wiegrebe; Stephan D Ewert
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-07-13

Review 7.  Bilateral cochlear implants in children: Effects of auditory experience and deprivation on auditory perception.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Karen Gordon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Interaural level differences do not suffice for restoring spatial release from masking in simulated cochlear implant listening.

Authors:  Antje Ihlefeld; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effects of degraded speech processing and binaural unmasking investigated using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).

Authors:  Xin Zhou; Gabriel S Sobczak; Colette M McKay; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.752

10.  Novel Approaches to Measure Spatial Release From Masking in Children With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Z Ellen Peng; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.