Literature DB >> 31033635

Validating a Quick Spectral Modulation Detection Task.

David M Landsberger1, Robert T Dwyer2, Natalia Stupak1, René H Gifford2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Quick Spectral Modulation Detection (QSMD) test provides a quick and clinically implementable spectral resolution estimate for cochlear implant (CI) users. However, the original QSMD software (QSMD(MySound)) has technical and usability limitations that prevent widespread distribution and implementation. In this article, we introduce a new software package EasyQSMD, which is freely available software with the goal of both simplifying and standardizing spectral resolution measurements.
DESIGN: QSMD was measured for 20 CI users using both software packages.
RESULTS: No differences between the two software packages were detected, and based on the 95% confidence interval of the difference between tests, the difference between the tests is expected to be <2% points. The average test duration was under 4 minutes.
CONCLUSIONS: EasyQSMD is considered functionally equivalent to QSMD(MySound) providing a clinically feasible and quick estimate of spectral resolution for CI users.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31033635      PMCID: PMC6776705          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  17 in total

1.  Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: normal hearing, hearing impaired, and cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Belinda A Henry; Christopher W Turner; Amy Behrens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The development of a modified spectral ripple test.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; David M Landsberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Spectral modulation detection and vowel and consonant identifications in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Aniket A Saoji; Leonid Litvak; Anthony J Spahr; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Clinical assessment of spectral modulation detection for adult cochlear implant recipients: a non-language based measure of performance outcomes.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Andrea Hedley-Williams; Anthony J Spahr
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Comparing spatial tuning curves, spectral ripple resolution, and speech perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Anderson; David A Nelson; Heather Kreft; Peggy B Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Deactivating stimulation sites based on low-rate thresholds improves spectral ripple and speech reception thresholds in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ning Zhou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Factors Affecting Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients Implanted With a Perimodiolar Electrode Array Located in Scala Tympani.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Jill B Firszt; Ruth M Reeder; Rosalie M Uchanski; Noël Y Dwyer; Timothy A Holden
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Validation of a clinical assessment of spectral-ripple resolution for cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Elizabeth S Anderson; Jong Ho Won; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Participant-generated Cochlear Implant Programs: Speech Recognition, Sound Quality, and Satisfaction.

Authors:  Robert T Dwyer; Tony Spahr; Smita Agrawal; Chris Hetlinger; Jourdan T Holder; René H Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Spectral-temporally modulated ripple test Lite for computeRless Measurement (SLRM): A Nonlinguistic Test for Audiology Clinics.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Natalia Stupak; Justin M Aronoff
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  2 in total

1.  Speech recognition with cochlear implants as a function of the number of channels: Effects of electrode placement.

Authors:  Katelyn A Berg; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; Robert T Dwyer; Robert F Labadie; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity in Cochlear-Implant and Normal-Hearing Listeners: Is the Performance Driven by Temporal or Spectral Modulation Sensitivity?

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Susannah Dixon; Zhen Zhu; Lixue Dong; Marti Weiner
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.