Literature DB >> 33940865

Speech recognition as a function of the number of channels for an array with large inter-electrode distances.

Katelyn A Berg1, Jack H Noble2, Benoit M Dawant2, Robert T Dwyer1, Robert F Labadie3, René H Gifford1.   

Abstract

This study investigated the number of channels available to cochlear implant (CI) recipients for maximum speech understanding and sound quality for lateral wall electrode arrays-which result in large electrode-to-modiolus distances-featuring the greatest inter-electrode distances (2.1-2.4 mm), the longest active lengths (23.1-26.4 mm), and the fewest number of electrodes commercially available. Participants included ten post-lingually deafened adult CI recipients with MED-EL electrode arrays (FLEX28 and STANDARD) entirely within scala tympani. Electrode placement and scalar location were determined using computerized tomography. The number of channels was varied from 4 to 12 with equal spatial distribution across the array. A continuous interleaved sampling-based strategy was used. Speech recognition, sound quality ratings, and a closed-set vowel recognition task were measured acutely for each electrode condition. Participants did not demonstrate statistically significant differences beyond eight channels at the group level for almost all measures. However, several listeners showed considerable improvements from 8 to 12 channels for speech and sound quality measures. These results suggest that channel interaction caused by the greater electrode-to-modiolus distances of straight electrode arrays could be partially compensated for by a large inter-electrode distance or spacing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33940865      PMCID: PMC8062138          DOI: 10.1121/10.0004244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  37 in total

1.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Clinical assessment of spectral modulation detection for adult cochlear implant recipients: a non-language based measure of performance outcomes.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Andrea Hedley-Williams; Anthony J Spahr
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Impact of electrode design and surgical approach on scalar location and cochlear implant outcomes.

Authors:  George B Wanna; Jack H Noble; Matthew L Carlson; René H Gifford; Mary S Dietrich; David S Haynes; Benoit M Dawant; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode electrical stimulation.

Authors:  M Chatterjee; R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Deactivating stimulation sites based on low-rate thresholds improves spectral ripple and speech reception thresholds in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ning Zhou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Threshold, comfortable level and impedance changes as a function of electrode-modiolar distance.

Authors:  Elaine Saunders; Lawrence Cohen; Antje Aschendorff; William Shapiro; Michelle Knight; Mathias Stecker; Benhard Richter; Susan Waltzman; Michael Tykocinski; Tom Roland; Roland Laszig; Robert Cowan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System.

Authors:  M W Skinner; G M Clark; L A Whitford; P M Seligman; S J Staller; D B Shipp; J K Shallop; C Everingham; C M Menapace; P L Arndt
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1994-11

Review 8.  Cochlear implants: current designs and future possibilities.

Authors:  Blake S Wilson; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

9.  Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Charles C Finley; Jill B Firszt; Timothy A Holden; Christine Brenner; Lisa G Potts; Brenda D Gotter; Sallie S Vanderhoof; Karen Mispagel; Gitry Heydebrand; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Variations in microanatomy of the human cochlea.

Authors:  Ersin Avci; Tim Nauwelaers; Thomas Lenarz; Volkmar Hamacher; Andrej Kral
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 3.215

View more
  3 in total

1.  Children's syntactic parsing and sentence comprehension with a degraded auditory signal.

Authors:  Isabel A Martin; Matthew J Goupell; Yi Ting Huang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech recognition as a function of the number of channels for pediatric cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Jourdan T Holder; Katelyn A Berg; Benoit M Dawant; Jack H Noble; Elizabeth Perkins; Stephen Camarata
Journal:  JASA Express Lett       Date:  2022-09

3.  The recognition of time-compressed speech as a function of age in listeners with cochlear implants or normal hearing.

Authors:  Anna R Tinnemore; Lauren Montero; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 5.702

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.