| Literature DB >> 28369124 |
Shu-Ju Tu1,2, Shun-Ping Wang3,4, Fu-Chou Cheng5, Chia-En Weng1, Wei-Tzu Huang1, Wei-Jeng Chang6, Ying-Ju Chen7.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The literature shows that bone mineral density (BMD) and the geometric architecture of trabecular bone in the femur may be affected by inadequate dietary intake of Mg. In this study, we used microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) to characterize and quantify the impact of a low-Mg diet on femoral trabecular bones in mice.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28369124 PMCID: PMC5378393 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174806
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1(A) The growth plate was first located at the distal femur site as a reference plane and delineated a 2 mm distance along the longitudinal direction as shown in the red box for our region of interest. (B) A 3-dimensional surface rendering figure of the whole femur bone which is reconstructed from micro CT images is shown.
Quantitative parameters for the imaging analysis of femoral trabecular bones.
| Parameters | Standard Unit | Definition and Description | Low-Mg vs Basal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total tissue volume | mm3 | Measurement of entire volume of region-of-interest in distal-metaphysis with a vertical length of 2.0 mm. The separation between the growth plate and total tissue volume is 0.5 mm. | Decrease |
| Bone volume | mm3 | Volume measurement of trabecular bones inside total tissue volume. | Decrease |
| Percent bone volume | % | Percent ratio of trabecular bone volume inside total tissue volume. | Decrease |
| Fractal dimension | Geometric complexity in the non-integer dimensionality. The fractal dimension in our analysis represents how trabecular bones occupy the space. | Decrease | |
| Structural model index | Relative prevalence between a rod and plate. The index is between 0 and 3. 0 represents a 2D plate and 3 for a 3D cylindrical rod. | Increase | |
| Trabecular segment number | Total trabecular segment number in the total tissue volume. The trabecular bone is modeled as a cylindrical rod. | Decrease | |
| Trabecular segment number density | mm-3 | Total number of trabecular segment divided by the measurement of total tissue volume | Decrease |
| Mean trabecular segment radius | mm | The average radius for total trabecular segments | Similar |
| Mean trabecular segment length | mm | The average length for total trabecular segments | Similar |
| Connecting node number | Total number of the branch node which is inter-connected by different trabecular segments. | Decrease | |
| Connecting node number density | mm-3 | Total number of connecting node divided by the total tissue volume | Decrease |
| Surface area to volume ratio | mm-1 | Amount of surface area per unit volume for trabecular bones | Increase |
| Bone mineral density | mg-HA/cm3 | Measurement of bone mineral content in mg-HA in total tissue volume divided by the total tissue volume | Decrease |
| Bone mineral content | mg-HA | Total bone mineral content in mg-HA in the total tissue volume | Decrease |
Fig 2Volumetric micro-CT imags of a femoral bone, depicting the trabecularbone (green) and cortical bone (gray) of a mouse in the control (A) and low-magnesium (B) group. Surface renderingwas employed to process the images.
Quantitative parameters for the imaging assessment of the bone characteristics of mice with a basal or low-Mg diet.
| Parameters | Total tissue volume | Bone volume | Percent bone volume | Fractal dimension | Structural model index | Trabecular segment number | Trabecular segment number density |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unit | mm3 | mm3 | % | mm-3 | |||
| Basal diet | 3.68±0.06 | 0.36±0.04 | 9.75±1.17 | 2.11±0.02 | 2.38±0.05 | 1119±225 | 5507±560 |
| Low-Mg diet | 3.48±0.09 | 0.26±0.02 | 7.51±0.59 | 2.02±0.01 | 2.61±0.04 | 794±73 | 4490±176 |
| Parameters | Mean trabecular segment radius | Mean trabecular segment length | Connecting node number | Connecting node density | Surface area to volume ratio | BMD | BMC |
| Unit | mm | mm | mm-3 | mm-1 | mg-HA/cm3 | mg-HA | |
| Basal diet | 0.0140±0.0002 | 0.1355±0.0021 | 704±127 | 3530±372 | 80.39±4.43 | 40.07±4.55 | 149.01±19.09 |
| Low-Mg diet | 0.0139±0.0003 | 0.1359±0.0022 | 508± 39 | 2897±140 | 85.88±1.73 | 33.10±2.80 | 115.74±10.49 |
Data are given as the mean ± SEM (n = 8).
All data were subjected to a t test; P < 0.05 was considered the level of statistical significance.
* P < 0.05 (compared with the basal diet group).
Fig 3Distributions of trabecular segment (A) length and (B) radius in mice with a basal or low-Mg diet. The curves have not been normalized, and the area under the distribution curve represents the total number of trabecular segments.
Plasma concentrations of Mg, Ca, and P in mice with a basal or low-Mg diet.
| Plasma levels | Basal diet | Low-Mg diet |
|---|---|---|
| Mg (mg/dl) | 2.27±0.03 | 1.29±0.04 |
| Ca (mg/dl) | 7.73±0.57 | 4.66±0.11 |
| P (mg/dl) | 5.89±0.27 | 5.36±0.29 |
Data are given as the mean ± SEM (n = 8).
All data were subjected to a t test; P < 0.05 was considered the level of statistical significance.
* P < 0.05 (compared with the basal diet group).
Urinary excretion of Mg, Ca, and P in mice with a basal or low-Mg diet.
| Urinary excretion | Basal diet | Low magnesium diet |
|---|---|---|
| Mg (mg/day) | 0.49±0.05 | 0.02±0.00 |
| Ca (mg/day) | 0.14±0.02 | 0.04±0.01 |
| P (mg/day) | 3.92±0.16 | 4.11±0.16 |
Data are given as the mean ± SEM (n = 8).
All data were subjected to a t test; P< 0.05 was considered the level of statistical significance.
* P< 0.05 (compared with the basal diet).