Literature DB >> 8838836

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and body composition.

M A Laskey1.   

Abstract

This review describes the advantages and limitations of dual-energy absorptiometry (DXA), a technique that is widely used clinically to assess a patient's risk of osteoporosis and to monitor the effects of therapy. DXA is also increasingly used to measure body composition in terms of fat and fat-free mass. There are three commercial manufacturers of DXA instruments: Lunar, Hologic, and Norland. All systems generate X-rays at two different energies and make use of the differential attenuation of the X-ray beam at these two energies to calculate the bone mineral content and soft tissue composition in the scanned region. Most DXA instruments measure bone mineral in the clinically important sites of the spine, hip, and forearm. More specialized systems also perform whole-body scans and can be used to determine the bone and soft tissue composition of the whole body and subregions such as arms, legs, and trunk. The effective dose incurred during DXA scanning is very small, and, consequently, DXA is a simple and safe technique that can be used for children and the old and frail. Precision of all DXA measurements is excellent but varies with the region under investigation. Precision is best for young healthy subjects (coefficient of variation is about 1% for the spine and whole body bone measurements) but is less good for osteoporotic and obese subjects. The accuracy of DXA measurements, however, can be problematic. Marked systematic differences in bone and soft tissue values are found between the three commercial systems due to differences in calibration, bone edge detection, and other factors. In addition, differences in reference data provided by each manufacturer can lead to an individual appearing normal on one machine but at risk of osteoporosis on another. At present, DXA cannot be regarded as a "gold standard" for body composition. However, the continuing development of DXA and the introduction of new software is greatly improving the performance of this increasingly important technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8838836     DOI: 10.1016/0899-9007(95)00017-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutrition        ISSN: 0899-9007            Impact factor:   4.008


  62 in total

Review 1.  Body composition assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Authors:  A Andreoli; G Scalzo; S Masala; U Tarantino; G Guglielmi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Evaluating body composition in infancy and childhood: A comparison between 4C, QMR, DXA, and ADP.

Authors:  Melissa E Heard-Lipsmeyer; Holly Hull; Clark R Sims; Mario A Cleves; Aline Andres
Journal:  Pediatr Obes       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  Fat distribution in children and adolescents with myelomeningocele.

Authors:  Nicole M Mueske; Deirdre D Ryan; Alexander L Van Speybroeck; Linda S Chan; Tishya A L Wren
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 5.449

4.  Body Segment Inertial Parameters of elite swimmers Using DXA and indirect Methods.

Authors:  Marcel Rossi; Andrew Lyttle; Amar El-Sallam; Nat Benjanuvatra; Brian Blanksby
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Body composition by DXA.

Authors:  John A Shepherd; Bennett K Ng; Markus J Sommer; Steven B Heymsfield
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Olfaction and Changes in Body Composition in a Large Cohort of Older U.S. Adults.

Authors:  Frank Purdy; Zhehui Luo; Joseph C Gardiner; Jayant M Pinto; Eric J Shiroma; Eleanor M Simonsick; Tamara B Harris; Honglei Chen
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 6.053

7.  Adiposity, but not Obesity, Is Associated With Arterial Stiffness in Young Nulliparous Women.

Authors:  Julie Phillips; Carole A McBride; Erin Morris; Abigail M Crocker; Ira Bernstein
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.060

8.  Body composition and resting energy expenditure in patients aged 11 to 21 years with spinal cord dysfunction compared to controls: comparisons and relationships among the groups.

Authors:  Rungsinee Amanda Liusuwan; Lana M Widman; Richard Ted Abresch; Dennis M Styne; Craig M McDonald
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.985

9.  Long-term increase of fat mass after a four week intervention with fast food based hyper-alimentation and limitation of physical activity.

Authors:  Asa Ernersson; Fredrik H Nystrom; Torbjörn Lindström
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 4.169

10.  Measurement of body composition in burned children: is there a gold standard?

Authors:  Ludwik K Branski; William B Norbury; David N Herndon; David L Chinkes; Amalia Cochran; Oscar Suman; Deb Benjamin; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.