| Literature DB >> 28359293 |
Frances C Quevenco1, Maria G Preti2,3, Jiri M G van Bergen1, Jun Hua4, Michael Wyss5, Xu Li4, Simon J Schreiner1,6, Stefanie C Steininger6, Rafael Meyer1,6, Irene B Meier1, Adam M Brickman7, Sandra E Leh1,6, Anton F Gietl1,6, Alfred Buck8, Roger M Nitsch1,6, Klaas P Pruessmann5, Peter C M van Zijl4, Christoph Hock1,6, Dimitri Van De Ville2,3, Paul G Unschuld9,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The incidence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) strongly relates to advanced age and progressive deposition of cerebral amyloid-beta (Aβ), hyperphosphorylated tau, and iron. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between cerebral dynamic functional connectivity and variability of long-term cognitive performance in healthy, elderly subjects, allowing for local pathology and genetic risk.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Amyloid beta; Dynamic functional connectivity; Episodic memory; Iron; Oxidative stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28359293 PMCID: PMC5374623 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-017-0249-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Alzheimers Res Ther Impact factor: 6.982
Mean scores of neuropsychological tests at inclusion of study and follow-up, as well as changes (%) in performance between sessions
| Test | Inclusion | Follow-up |
| Total sample ( | No decline, % change per year | No decline | Decline, % change per year | Decline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMSE | 29.03 (1.17) | 29.03 (1.19) | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.83% ( | <0.001 | –1.97% ( | <0.0001 |
| BNT | 14.32 (1) | 14.46 (0.84) | 0.53 | 0.01 | 1.45% ( | <0.01 | –5.53% ( | <0.015 |
| DSF | 6.81 (1.66) | 6.84 (1.55) | 0.94 | 0.02 | 10.32% ( | <0.01 | –14.09% ( | <0.001 |
| DSB | 6.08 (1.57) | 5.95 (1.73) | 0.73 | 0.00 | 10.32% ( | <0.001 | –11.69% ( | <0.0001 |
| TMT B/A | 2.83 (1.27) | 2.61 (1) | 0.41 | 0.00 | 17.51% ( | <0.002 | –18.84% ( | <0.001 |
| VLMT delayed recall | 8.49 (3.92) | 9.62 (4.21) | 0.23 | 0.19 | 46.22% ( | <0.001 | –9.31% ( | <0.01 |
Values are shown as mean (SD)
*Follow-up versus inclusion
BNT Boston Naming Test, DSB Digit Span Backward, DSF Digit Span Forward, MMSE Mini-Mental State Examination, TMT B/A Trail Making Test part B/part A, VLMT Verbal Learning and Memory Test
Fig. 1Venn diagram illustrating the relationship of “decliners” among the different strata. Each circle is labeled according to the neuropsychological test it represents: A, delayed recall Verbal Learning and Memory Test; B, Digit Span Backward test; C, Trail-Making Test; D, Digit Span Forward test; E, Boston Naming Test). The small circle without a label in the same color as E also illustrates decliners in the Boston Naming Test
Fig. 2a Coronal, sagittal and axial views of the 2% strongest connections in brain space of the anterior-posterior network. Brain regions are shown as spheres where their size represents their degree and color represents the algebraic sign of relative node strength (red for positive, blue for negative). Connections follow the same color scheme. b Corresponding eigenconnectivity for anterior-posterior network. Plot follows an identical color scheme as the glass brains. Each number on the x and y axes represents a label on the AAL atlas
Fig. 3a Exemplary 11C-PiB-PET image, indicating regional distribution of standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) as a measure of local Aβ deposition. b Exemplary QSM image at 7T, indicating regional distribution of susceptibility as used for inferring on local iron load. c Correlation between node strength of the anterior-posterior network and local iron load. Significance as indicated by alpha of 5% after correction for multiple testing (FDR) was reached at –log10(p) = 1.3
Fig. 4Group differences between subjects with lower memory performance after 2 years and subjects without decline at follow-up, as measured by VLMT delayed recall, in iron load of significant nodes in the anterior-posterior network (MANOVA, p < 0.05 after correction for multiple testing by FDR). Indicated is the susceptibility measure, as a quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM)-derived inference on local iron content. Numbers refer to the effect size, as calculated by Cohen’s d
Fig. 5Axial, sagittal and coronal views of the 2% strongest connections in brain space of a global, fronto-temporal, and fronto-occipital network (rows 1–3, respectively), demonstrated to drive the group difference between subjects who display both APOE-e4 expression and memory decline versus the remaining sample. Brain regions are shown as nodes (spheres) where their size represents their degree and the color code matches the algebraic sign of relative node strength (red and yellow for positive, green, turquoise and blue for negative). Connections follow the same color scheme