BACKGROUND: PET imaging using [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and [(11)C]Pittsburgh compound B (PIB) have been proposed as biomarkers of Alzheimer disease (AD), as have CSF measures of the 42 amino acid beta-amyloid protein (Abeta(1-42)) and total and phosphorylated tau (t-tau and p-tau). Relationships between biomarkers and with disease severity are incompletely understood. METHODS: Ten subjects with AD, 11 control subjects, and 34 subjects with mild cognitive impairment from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative underwent clinical evaluation; CSF measurement of Abeta(1-42), t-tau, and p-tau; and PIB-PET and FDG-PET scanning. Data were analyzed using continuous regression and dichotomous outcomes with subjects classified as "positive" or "negative" for AD based on cutoffs established in patients with AD and controls from other cohorts. RESULTS: Dichotomous categorization showed substantial agreement between PIB-PET and CSF Abeta(1-42) measures (91% agreement, kappa = 0.74), modest agreement between PIB-PET and p-tau (76% agreement, kappa = 0.50), and minimal agreement for other comparisons (kappa <0.3). Mini-Mental State Examination score was significantly correlated with FDG-PET but not with PIB-PET or CSF Abeta(1-42). Regression models adjusted for diagnosis showed that PIB-PET was significantly correlated with Abeta(1-42), t-tau, and p-tau(181p), whereas FDG-PET was correlated only with Abeta(1-42). CONCLUSIONS: PET and CSF biomarkers of Abeta agree with one another but are not related to cognitive impairment. [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose-PET is modestly related to other biomarkers but is better related to cognition. Different biomarkers for Alzheimer disease provide different information from one another that is likely to be complementary.
BACKGROUND: PET imaging using [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and [(11)C]Pittsburgh compound B (PIB) have been proposed as biomarkers of Alzheimer disease (AD), as have CSF measures of the 42 amino acid beta-amyloid protein (Abeta(1-42)) and total and phosphorylated tau (t-tau and p-tau). Relationships between biomarkers and with disease severity are incompletely understood. METHODS: Ten subjects with AD, 11 control subjects, and 34 subjects with mild cognitive impairment from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative underwent clinical evaluation; CSF measurement of Abeta(1-42), t-tau, and p-tau; and PIB-PET and FDG-PET scanning. Data were analyzed using continuous regression and dichotomous outcomes with subjects classified as "positive" or "negative" for AD based on cutoffs established in patients with AD and controls from other cohorts. RESULTS: Dichotomous categorization showed substantial agreement between PIB-PET and CSF Abeta(1-42) measures (91% agreement, kappa = 0.74), modest agreement between PIB-PET and p-tau (76% agreement, kappa = 0.50), and minimal agreement for other comparisons (kappa <0.3). Mini-Mental State Examination score was significantly correlated with FDG-PET but not with PIB-PET or CSF Abeta(1-42). Regression models adjusted for diagnosis showed that PIB-PET was significantly correlated with Abeta(1-42), t-tau, and p-tau(181p), whereas FDG-PET was correlated only with Abeta(1-42). CONCLUSIONS: PET and CSF biomarkers of Abeta agree with one another but are not related to cognitive impairment. [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose-PET is modestly related to other biomarkers but is better related to cognition. Different biomarkers for Alzheimer disease provide different information from one another that is likely to be complementary.
Authors: Anton Forsberg; Henry Engler; Ove Almkvist; Gunnar Blomquist; Göran Hagman; Anders Wall; Anna Ringheim; Bengt Långström; Agneta Nordberg Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2007-05-11 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: E C Mormino; J T Kluth; C M Madison; G D Rabinovici; S L Baker; B L Miller; R A Koeppe; C A Mathis; M W Weiner; W J Jagust Journal: Brain Date: 2008-11-28 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: C Haense; K Buerger; E Kalbe; A Drzezga; S J Teipel; P Markiewicz; K Herholz; W D Heiss; H Hampel Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2008-09-18 Impact factor: 6.089
Authors: Leslie M Shaw; Hugo Vanderstichele; Malgorzata Knapik-Czajka; Christopher M Clark; Paul S Aisen; Ronald C Petersen; Kaj Blennow; Holly Soares; Adam Simon; Piotr Lewczuk; Robert Dean; Eric Siemers; William Potter; Virginia M-Y Lee; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Lisa Mosconi; Susan De Santi; Miroslaw Brys; Wai H Tsui; Elizabeth Pirraglia; Lidia Glodzik-Sobanska; Kenneth E Rich; Remigius Switalski; Pankaj D Mehta; Domenico Pratico; Ray Zinkowski; Kay Blennow; Mony J de Leon Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2007-08-27 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Oskar Hansson; Henrik Zetterberg; Eugeen Vanmechelen; Hugo Vanderstichele; Ulf Andreasson; Elisabet Londos; Anders Wallin; Lennart Minthon; Kaj Blennow Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2008-05-19 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: J Koivunen; T Pirttilä; N Kemppainen; S Aalto; S-K Herukka; A M Jauhianen; T Hänninen; M Hallikainen; K Någren; J O Rinne; H Soininen Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Date: 2008-10-16 Impact factor: 2.959
Authors: R Ceravolo; D Borghetti; L Kiferle; G Tognoni; A Giorgetti; D Neglia; N Sassi; D Frosini; C Rossi; L Petrozzi; G Siciliano; L Murri Journal: Brain Res Bull Date: 2008-02-11 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Clifford R Jack; Val J Lowe; Matthew L Senjem; Stephen D Weigand; Bradley J Kemp; Maria M Shiung; David S Knopman; Bradley F Boeve; William E Klunk; Chester A Mathis; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Brain Date: 2008-02-07 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Henrik Zetterberg; Mona Pedersen; Karin Lind; Maria Svensson; Sindre Rolstad; Carl Eckerström; Steinar Syversen; Ulla-Britt Mattsson; Christina Ysander; Niklas Mattsson; Arto Nordlund; Hugo Vanderstichele; Eugeen Vanmechelen; Michael Jonsson; Ake Edman; Kaj Blennow; Anders Wallin Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Laurel A Beckett; Danielle J Harvey; Anthony Gamst; Michael Donohue; John Kornak; Hao Zhang; Julie H Kuo Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: William J Jagust; Dan Bandy; Kewei Chen; Norman L Foster; Susan M Landau; Chester A Mathis; Julie C Price; Eric M Reiman; Daniel Skovronsky; Robert A Koeppe Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Michael W Weiner; Paul S Aisen; Clifford R Jack; William J Jagust; John Q Trojanowski; Leslie Shaw; Andrew J Saykin; John C Morris; Nigel Cairns; Laurel A Beckett; Arthur Toga; Robert Green; Sarah Walter; Holly Soares; Peter Snyder; Eric Siemers; William Potter; Patricia E Cole; Mark Schmidt Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: John Q Trojanowski; Hugo Vandeerstichele; Magdalena Korecka; Christopher M Clark; Paul S Aisen; Ronald C Petersen; Kaj Blennow; Holly Soares; Adam Simon; Piotr Lewczuk; Robert Dean; Eric Siemers; William Z Potter; Michael W Weiner; Clifford R Jack; William Jagust; Arthur W Toga; Virginia M-Y Lee; Leslie M Shaw Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Michael W Weiner; Dallas P Veitch; Paul S Aisen; Laurel A Beckett; Nigel J Cairns; Robert C Green; Danielle Harvey; Clifford R Jack; William Jagust; Enchi Liu; John C Morris; Ronald C Petersen; Andrew J Saykin; Mark E Schmidt; Leslie Shaw; Judith A Siuciak; Holly Soares; Arthur W Toga; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2011-11-02 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Lisa Mosconi; Juha O Rinne; Wai H Tsui; John Murray; Yi Li; Lidia Glodzik; Pauline McHugh; Schantel Williams; Megan Cummings; Elizabeth Pirraglia; Stanley J Goldsmith; Shankar Vallabhajosula; Noora Scheinin; Tapio Viljanen; Kjell Någren; Mony J de Leon Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2012-04-11 Impact factor: 4.673