OBJECTIVE: Assess Aβ deposition longitudinally and explore its relationship with cognition and disease progression. METHODS: Clinical follow-up was obtained 20 ± 3 months after [¹¹C]Pittsburgh compound B (PiB)-positron emission tomography in 206 subjects: 35 with dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT), 65 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 106 age-matched healthy controls (HCs). A second PiB scan was obtained at follow-up in 185 subjects and a third scan after 3 years in 57. RESULTS: At baseline, 97% of DAT, 69% of MCI, and 31% of HC subjects showed high PiB retention. At 20-month follow-up, small but significant increases in PiB standardized uptake value ratios were observed in the DAT and MCI groups, and in HCs with high PiB retention at baseline (5.7%, 2.1%, and 1.5%, respectively). Increases were associated with the number of apolipoprotein E ε4 alleles. There was a weak correlation between PiB increases and decline in cognition when all groups were combined. Progression to DAT occurred in 67% of MCI with high PiB versus 5% of those with low PiB, but 20% of the low PiB MCI subjects progressed to other dementias. Of the high PiB HCs, 16% developed MCI or DAT by 20 months and 25% by 3 years. One low PiB HC developed MCI. INTERPRETATION: Aβ deposition increases slowly from cognitive normality to moderate severity DAT. Extensive Aβ deposition precedes cognitive impairment, and is associated with ApoE genotype and a higher risk of cognitive decline in HCs and progression from MCI to DAT over 1 to 2 years. However, cognitive decline is only weakly related to change in Aβ burden, suggesting that downstream factors have a more direct effect on symptom progression.
OBJECTIVE: Assess Aβ deposition longitudinally and explore its relationship with cognition and disease progression. METHODS: Clinical follow-up was obtained 20 ± 3 months after [¹¹C]Pittsburgh compound B (PiB)-positron emission tomography in 206 subjects: 35 with dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT), 65 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 106 age-matched healthy controls (HCs). A second PiB scan was obtained at follow-up in 185 subjects and a third scan after 3 years in 57. RESULTS: At baseline, 97% of DAT, 69% of MCI, and 31% of HC subjects showed high PiB retention. At 20-month follow-up, small but significant increases in PiB standardized uptake value ratios were observed in the DAT and MCI groups, and in HCs with high PiB retention at baseline (5.7%, 2.1%, and 1.5%, respectively). Increases were associated with the number of apolipoprotein E ε4 alleles. There was a weak correlation between PiB increases and decline in cognition when all groups were combined. Progression to DAT occurred in 67% of MCI with high PiB versus 5% of those with low PiB, but 20% of the low PiB MCI subjects progressed to other dementias. Of the high PiB HCs, 16% developed MCI or DAT by 20 months and 25% by 3 years. One low PiB HC developed MCI. INTERPRETATION: Aβ deposition increases slowly from cognitive normality to moderate severity DAT. Extensive Aβ deposition precedes cognitive impairment, and is associated with ApoE genotype and a higher risk of cognitive decline in HCs and progression from MCI to DAT over 1 to 2 years. However, cognitive decline is only weakly related to change in Aβ burden, suggesting that downstream factors have a more direct effect on symptom progression.
Authors: N Tzourio-Mazoyer; B Landeau; D Papathanassiou; F Crivello; O Etard; N Delcroix; B Mazoyer; M Joliot Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: I J Martins; E Hone; J K Foster; S I Sünram-Lea; A Gnjec; S J Fuller; D Nolan; S E Gandy; R N Martins Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2006-06-20 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: M A Mintun; G N Larossa; Y I Sheline; C S Dence; S Y Lee; R H Mach; W E Klunk; C A Mathis; S T DeKosky; J C Morris Journal: Neurology Date: 2006-08-08 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: S Parvathy; P Davies; V Haroutunian; D P Purohit; K L Davis; R C Mohs; H Park; T M Moran; J Y Chan; J D Buxbaum Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2001-12
Authors: Henry Engler; Anton Forsberg; Ove Almkvist; Gunnar Blomquist; Emma Larsson; Irina Savitcheva; Anders Wall; Anna Ringheim; Bengt Långström; Agneta Nordberg Journal: Brain Date: 2006-07-19 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: William E Klunk; Henry Engler; Agneta Nordberg; Yanming Wang; Gunnar Blomqvist; Daniel P Holt; Mats Bergström; Irina Savitcheva; Guo-feng Huang; Sergio Estrada; Birgitta Ausén; Manik L Debnath; Julien Barletta; Julie C Price; Johan Sandell; Brian J Lopresti; Anders Wall; Pernilla Koivisto; Gunnar Antoni; Chester A Mathis; Bengt Långström Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Andrei G Vlassenko; Mark A Mintun; Chengjie Xiong; Yvette I Sheline; Alison M Goate; Tammie L S Benzinger; John C Morris Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Mert R Sabuncu; Randy L Buckner; Jordan W Smoller; Phil Hyoun Lee; Bruce Fischl; Reisa A Sperling Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2011-12-13 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Reisa A Sperling; Paul S Aisen; Laurel A Beckett; David A Bennett; Suzanne Craft; Anne M Fagan; Takeshi Iwatsubo; Clifford R Jack; Jeffrey Kaye; Thomas J Montine; Denise C Park; Eric M Reiman; Christopher C Rowe; Eric Siemers; Yaakov Stern; Kristine Yaffe; Maria C Carrillo; Bill Thies; Marcelle Morrison-Bogorad; Molly V Wagster; Creighton H Phelps Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2011-04-21 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Clifford R Jack; Prashanthi Vemuri; Heather J Wiste; Stephen D Weigand; Timothy G Lesnick; Val Lowe; Kejal Kantarci; Matt A Bernstein; Matthew L Senjem; Jeffrey L Gunter; Bradley F Boeve; John Q Trojanowski; Leslie M Shaw; Paul S Aisen; Michael W Weiner; Ronald C Petersen; David S Knopman Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2012-07
Authors: Natalie L Marchant; Bruce R Reed; Charles S DeCarli; Cindee M Madison; Michael W Weiner; Helena C Chui; William J Jagust Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2011-11-01 Impact factor: 4.673