Literature DB >> 20656037

Partial Least Squares (PLS) methods for neuroimaging: a tutorial and review.

Anjali Krishnan1, Lynne J Williams, Anthony Randal McIntosh, Hervé Abdi.   

Abstract

Partial Least Squares (PLS) methods are particularly suited to the analysis of relationships between measures of brain activity and of behavior or experimental design. In neuroimaging, PLS refers to two related methods: (1) symmetric PLS or Partial Least Squares Correlation (PLSC), and (2) asymmetric PLS or Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR). The most popular (by far) version of PLS for neuroimaging is PLSC. It exists in several varieties based on the type of data that are related to brain activity: behavior PLSC analyzes the relationship between brain activity and behavioral data, task PLSC analyzes how brain activity relates to pre-defined categories or experimental design, seed PLSC analyzes the pattern of connectivity between brain regions, and multi-block or multi-table PLSC integrates one or more of these varieties in a common analysis. PLSR, in contrast to PLSC, is a predictive technique which, typically, predicts behavior (or design) from brain activity. For both PLS methods, statistical inferences are implemented using cross-validation techniques to identify significant patterns of voxel activation. This paper presents both PLS methods and illustrates them with small numerical examples and typical applications in neuroimaging.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20656037     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  303 in total

1.  Default network modulation and large-scale network interactivity in healthy young and old adults.

Authors:  R Nathan Spreng; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Lifelong bilingualism maintains white matter integrity in older adults.

Authors:  Gigi Luk; Ellen Bialystok; Fergus I M Craik; Cheryl L Grady
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Age differences in default and reward networks during processing of personally relevant information.

Authors:  Cheryl L Grady; Omer Grigg; Charisa Ng
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Establishing homology between monkey and human brains.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; Tal Yarkoni
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  The modulation of BOLD variability between cognitive states varies by age and processing speed.

Authors:  Douglas D Garrett; Natasa Kovacevic; Anthony R McIntosh; Cheryl L Grady
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 6.  Molecular brain imaging in the multimodality era.

Authors:  Julie C Price
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 7.  The cognitive neuroscience of ageing.

Authors:  Cheryl Grady
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  Brain Changes Following Executive Control Training in Older Adults.

Authors:  Areeba Adnan; Anthony J W Chen; Tatjana Novakovic-Agopian; Mark D'Esposito; Gary R Turner
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 9.  Harnessing networks and machine learning in neuropsychiatric care.

Authors:  Eli J Cornblath; David M Lydon-Staley; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2019-01-12       Impact factor: 6.627

10.  Spatially aggregated multiclass pattern classification in functional MRI using optimally selected functional brain areas.

Authors:  Weili Zheng; Elena S Ackley; Manel Martínez-Ramón; Stefan Posse
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 2.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.