AIMS: To explore the views of the Belgian public on various topics surrounding genetics and genetic testing (GT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A written questionnaire was administered to visitors of the annual cartoon festival in Knokke-Heist, Belgium, during the summer of 2014. The main theme of the festival was challenges and progress in human genetics and it was attended by more than 100,000 visitors. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 1182 respondents, resulting in a demographically diverse sample with a mean age of 48.5 years. Our respondents expressed moderate interest in predictive GT, with 39.1% willing to learn about their predisposition to diseases through GT and 49.5% indicating interest in getting tested exclusively for treatable/preventable diseases. We observed higher interest in GT for reproductive purposes, such as preconception screening for recessive disorders (53.8%) and prenatal GT (60.7%). A substantial minority (46.4%) of the respondents were worried that GT could further stigmatize people with disabilities, while 39.7% believed that carrier screening for recessive diseases would lead to an inferior image of people affected by them. CONCLUSION: Paying due attention to the attitudes, beliefs, and concerns of the general public is important to ensure ethically sound and socially acceptable implementation of new genetic technologies.
AIMS: To explore the views of the Belgian public on various topics surrounding genetics and genetic testing (GT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A written questionnaire was administered to visitors of the annual cartoon festival in Knokke-Heist, Belgium, during the summer of 2014. The main theme of the festival was challenges and progress in human genetics and it was attended by more than 100,000 visitors. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 1182 respondents, resulting in a demographically diverse sample with a mean age of 48.5 years. Our respondents expressed moderate interest in predictive GT, with 39.1% willing to learn about their predisposition to diseases through GT and 49.5% indicating interest in getting tested exclusively for treatable/preventable diseases. We observed higher interest in GT for reproductive purposes, such as preconception screening for recessive disorders (53.8%) and prenatal GT (60.7%). A substantial minority (46.4%) of the respondents were worried that GT could further stigmatize people with disabilities, while 39.7% believed that carrier screening for recessive diseases would lead to an inferior image of people affected by them. CONCLUSION: Paying due attention to the attitudes, beliefs, and concerns of the general public is important to ensure ethically sound and socially acceptable implementation of new genetic technologies.
Authors: Marcel Margulies; Michael Egholm; William E Altman; Said Attiya; Joel S Bader; Lisa A Bemben; Jan Berka; Michael S Braverman; Yi-Ju Chen; Zhoutao Chen; Scott B Dewell; Lei Du; Joseph M Fierro; Xavier V Gomes; Brian C Godwin; Wen He; Scott Helgesen; Chun Heen Ho; Chun He Ho; Gerard P Irzyk; Szilveszter C Jando; Maria L I Alenquer; Thomas P Jarvie; Kshama B Jirage; Jong-Bum Kim; James R Knight; Janna R Lanza; John H Leamon; Steven M Lefkowitz; Ming Lei; Jing Li; Kenton L Lohman; Hong Lu; Vinod B Makhijani; Keith E McDade; Michael P McKenna; Eugene W Myers; Elizabeth Nickerson; John R Nobile; Ramona Plant; Bernard P Puc; Michael T Ronan; George T Roth; Gary J Sarkis; Jan Fredrik Simons; John W Simpson; Maithreyan Srinivasan; Karrie R Tartaro; Alexander Tomasz; Kari A Vogt; Greg A Volkmer; Shally H Wang; Yong Wang; Michael P Weiner; Pengguang Yu; Richard F Begley; Jonathan M Rothberg Journal: Nature Date: 2005-07-31 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: L S Di Prospero; M Seminsky; J Honeyford; B Doan; E Franssen; W Meschino; P Chart; E Warner Journal: CMAJ Date: 2001-04-03 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: C Foster; D G R Evans; R Eeles; D Eccles; S Ashley; L Brooks; T Cole; J Cook; R Davidson; H Gregory; J Mackay; P J Morrison; M Watson Journal: Genet Test Date: 2004
Authors: Katherine W Saylor; Lynette Ekunwe; Donna Antoine-LaVigne; Deborah E Sellers; Sarah McGraw; Daniel Levy; Greta Lee Splansky; Steven Joffe Journal: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics Date: 2019-05-08 Impact factor: 1.742
Authors: Kayla E Wagner; Jennifer B McCormick; Sarah Barns; Molly Carney; Frank A Middleton; Steven D Hicks Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2019-03-22