Literature DB >> 15140372

Racial and ethnic variations in knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing.

Eleanor Singer1, Toni Antonucci, John Van Hoewyk.   

Abstract

This study was designed to shed light on whether differences in utilization of genetic testing by African-Americans, Latinos, and non-Hispanic Whites are due primarily to different preferences, or whether they instead reflect other values and beliefs or differential access. It explores the values, attitudes, and beliefs of African-Americans, Latinos, and non-Hispanic Whites with respect to genetic testing by means of a telephone survey of representative samples of these three groups. The study finds clear evidence that Latinos and African-Americans are, if anything, more likely to express preferences for both prenatal and adult genetic testing than White respondents. At the same time, they hold other beliefs and attitudes that may conflict with, and override, these preferences in specific situations. African-Americans and Latinos are also less knowledgeable about genetic testing than non-Hispanic Whites, and they are less likely to have the financial resources or insurance coverage that would facilitate access to testing.

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15140372     DOI: 10.1089/109065704323016012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Test        ISSN: 1090-6576


  78 in total

1.  Evaluation findings from genetics and family health history community-based workshops for African Americans.

Authors:  Jo-Anne Manswell Butty; Finie Richardson; Charles P Mouton; Charmaine D M Royal; Rodney D Green; Kerry-Ann Munroe
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-11-05

2.  Racial and ethnic differences in direct-to-consumer genetic tests awareness in HINTS 2007: sociodemographic and numeracy correlates.

Authors:  Aisha T Langford; Ken Resnicow; J Scott Roberts; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Awareness and attitudes regarding prenatal testing among Texas women of childbearing age.

Authors:  Amy P Case; Tunu A Ramadhani; Mark A Canfield; Catherine A Wicklund
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Acceptance of genetic testing for hereditary breast ovarian cancer among study enrollees from an African American kindred.

Authors:  Anita Yeomans Kinney; Sara Ellis Simonsen; Bonnie Jeanne Baty; Diptasri Mandal; Susan L Neuhausen; Kate Seggar; Rich Holubkov; Ken Smith
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  Attitudes Toward Return of Genetic Research Results to Relatives, Including After Death: Comparison of Cancer Probands, Blood Relatives, and Spouse/Partners.

Authors:  Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Susan M Wolf; Kari G Chaffee; Marguerite E Robinson; Noralane M Lindor; Deborah R Gordon; Barbara A Koenig; Gloria M Petersen
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  God and genes in the caring professions: clinician and clergy perceptions of religion and genetics.

Authors:  Virginia L Bartlett; Rolanda L Johnson
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 3.908

7.  Perceptions regarding genetic testing in populations at risk for nephropathy.

Authors:  Barry I Freedman; Alison J Fletcher; Vivek R Sanghani; Mitzie Spainhour; Angelina W Graham; Gregory B Russell; Jessica N Cooke Bailey; Ana S Iltis; Nancy M P King
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.754

8.  Factors Associated with African-American Women's Decisions to Participate in Genetic Research.

Authors:  Carolyn H Still; Faye A Gary; Patricia E McDonald; Hossein N Yarandi
Journal:  J Natl Black Nurses Assoc       Date:  2014-07

9.  Perspectives of psychiatric investigators and IRB chairs regarding benefits of psychiatric genetics research.

Authors:  Laura Weiss Roberts; Laura B Dunn; Jane Paik Kim; Maryam Rostami
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 4.791

10.  Parent and public interest in whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Daniel S Dodson; Aaron J Goldenberg; Matthew M Davis; Dianne C Singer; Beth A Tarini
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.