Literature DB >> 33712027

First French study relative to preconception genetic testing: 1500 general population participants' opinion.

Maud Jourdain1,2, Bertrand Isidor3, Valérie Bonneau1,2, Mathilde Nizon4, Xenia Latypova4, Aurélie Gaultier5, Eugénie Hoarau1,2, Stéphane Bézieau4, Guy Minguet6, Mauro Turrini7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Until very recently, preconception genetic testing was only conducted in particular communities, ethnic groups or families for which an increased risk of genetic disease was identified. To detect in general population a risk for a couple to have a child affected by a rare, recessive or X-linked, genetic disease, carrier screening is proposed in several countries. We aimed to determine the current public opinion relative to this approach in France, using either a printed or web-based questionnaire.
RESULTS: Among the 1568 participants, 91% are favorable to preconception genetic tests and 57% declare to be willing to have the screening if the latter is available. A medical prescription by a family doctor or a gynecologist would be the best way to propose the test for 73%, with a reimbursement from the social security insurance. However, 19% declare not to be willing to use the test because of their ethic or moral convictions, and the fear that the outcome would question the pregnancy. Otherwise, most participants consider that the test is a medical progress despite the risk of an increased medicalization of the pregnancy.
CONCLUSION: This first study in France highlights a global favorable opinion for the preconception genetic carrier testing under a medical prescription and a reimbursement by social security insurance. Our results emphasize as well the complex concerns underpinned by the use of this screening strategy. Therefore, the ethical issues related to these tests include the risk of eugenic drift mentioned by more than half of the participants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Expanded carrier screening; Preconception genetic testing; Reproductive medicine

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33712027      PMCID: PMC7955630          DOI: 10.1186/s13023-021-01754-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis        ISSN: 1750-1172            Impact factor:   4.123


  24 in total

1.  Legislation on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in seven European countries.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Rachel E van Hellemondt; Dominique Sprumont; Camilla Fittipaldi Duarte Jales; Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag; Tade Matthias Spranger; Liam Curren; Jane Kaye; Herman Nys; Heidi Howard
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Participation in genetic testing research varies by social group.

Authors:  Sharon Hensley Alford; Colleen M McBride; Robert J Reid; Eric B Larson; Andreas D Baxevanis; Lawrence C Brody
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 3.  Preconception and prenatal genetic counselling.

Authors:  Adonis S Ioannides
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 5.237

4.  Patient actions and reactions after receiving negative results from expanded carrier screening.

Authors:  S A Kraft; J L Schneider; M C Leo; T L Kauffman; J V Davis; K M Porter; C K McMullen; B S Wilfond; K A B Goddard
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Experiences among Women with Positive Prenatal Expanded Carrier Screening Results.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Erin Johnson; Amber Mathiesen; Kylie Golden; Audrey Metcalf; Nancy C Rose; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  "I'm Healthy, It's Not Going To Be Me": Exploring experiences of carriers identified through a population reproductive genetic carrier screening panel in Australia.

Authors:  Catherine A Beard; David J Amor; Louisa Di Pietro; Alison D Archibald
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  Public Views on Genetics and Genetic Testing: A Survey of the General Public in Belgium.

Authors:  Davit Chokoshvili; Carmen Belmans; Roxanne Poncelet; Sofie Sanders; Deborah Vaes; Danya Vears; Sandra Janssens; Isabelle Huys; Pascal Borry
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2017-03

8.  Preconception care and genetic risk: ethical issues.

Authors:  Guido M W R De Wert; Wybo J Dondorp; Bartha M Knoppers
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-12-29

9.  Assessment of willingness to pay for expanded carrier screening among women and couples undergoing preconception carrier screening.

Authors:  Elizabeth V Clarke; Jennifer L Schneider; Frances Lynch; Tia L Kauffman; Michael C Leo; Ana G Rosales; John F Dickerson; Elizabeth Shuster; Benjamin S Wilfond; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The aims of expanded universal carrier screening: Autonomy, prevention, and responsible parenthood.

Authors:  Sanne van der Hout; Wybo Dondorp; Guido de Wert
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 1.898

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Societal implications of expanded universal carrier screening: a scoping review.

Authors:  Lieke M van den Heuvel; Nina van den Berg; A Cecile J W Janssens; Erwin Birnie; Lidewij Henneman; Wybo J Dondorp; Mirjam Plantinga; Irene M van Langen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 5.351

2.  Qualitative study of GPs' views and experiences of population-based preconception expanded carrier screening in the Netherlands: bioethical perspectives.

Authors:  Sofia Morberg Jämterud; Anke Snoek; I M van Langen; Marian Verkerk; Kristin Zeiler
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.