Literature DB >> 15140371

Non-uptake of predictive genetic testing for BRCA1/2 among relatives of known carriers: attributes, cancer worry, and barriers to testing in a multicenter clinical cohort.

C Foster1, D G R Evans, R Eeles, D Eccles, S Ashley, L Brooks, T Cole, J Cook, R Davidson, H Gregory, J Mackay, P J Morrison, M Watson.   

Abstract

BRCA1/2 test decliners/deferrers have received almost no attention in the literature and this is the first study of this population in the United Kingdom. The aim of this multicenter study is to examine the attributes of a group of individuals offered predictive genetic testing for breast/ovarian cancer predisposition who did not wish to proceed with testing at the time of entry into this study. This forms part of a larger study involving 9 U.K. centers investigating the psychosocial impact of predictive genetic testing for BRCA1/2. Cancer worry and reasons for declining or deferring BRCA1/2 predictive genetic testing were evaluated by questionnaire following genetic counseling. A total of 34 individuals declined the offer of predictive genetic testing. Compared to the national cohort of test acceptors, test decliners are significantly younger. Female test decliners have lower levels of cancer worry than female test acceptors. Barriers to testing include apprehension about the result, traveling to the genetics clinic, and taking time away from work/family. Women are more likely than men to worry about receiving less screening if found not to be a carrier. The findings do not indicate that healthy BRCA1/2 test decliners are a more vulnerable group in terms of cancer worry. However, barriers to testing need to be discussed in genetic counseling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15140371     DOI: 10.1089/109065704323016003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Test        ISSN: 1090-6576


  25 in total

1.  The role of distress in uptake and response to predisposition genetic testing: the BMPR2 experience.

Authors:  Diana L Jones; Ellen W Clayton
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2011-11-15

2.  Comparing family members' motivations and attitudes towards genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Caroline Dancyger; Jonathan A Smith; Chris Jacobs; Melissa Wallace; Susan Michie
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Family Communication in Inherited Cardiovascular Conditions in Ireland.

Authors:  Sinead Whyte; Andrew Green; Marion McAllister; Hannah Shipman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Factors associated with an individuals' decision to withdraw from genetic counseling for BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes mutations: are personality traits involved?

Authors:  Anita Caruso; Cristina Vigna; Valentina Bigazzi; Carlo Leone; Gabriella Maggi; Aline Martayan; Fabio M Sega; Francesco Cognetti; Antonella Savarese
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Deaf genetic testing and psychological well-being in deaf adults.

Authors:  Christina G S Palmer; Patrick Boudreault; Erin E Baldwin; Michelle Fox; Joshua L Deignan; Yoko Kobayashi; Yvonne Sininger; Wayne Grody; Janet S Sinsheimer
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Predictors of genetic testing decisions: a systematic review and critique of the literature.

Authors:  Kate Sweeny; Arezou Ghane; Angela M Legg; Ho Phi Huynh; Sara E Andrews
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  The use of family history questionnaires: an examination of genetic risk estimates and genetic testing eligibility in the non-responder population.

Authors:  Susan Randall Armel; Kara Hitchman; Kathryn Millar; Laura Zahavich; Rochelle Demsky; Joan Murphy; Barry Rosen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Why Is Cancer Genetic Counseling Underutilized by Women Identified as at Risk for Hereditary Breast Cancer? Patient Perceptions of Barriers Following a Referral Letter.

Authors:  Alyssa Kne; Heather Zierhut; Shari Baldinger; Karen K Swenson; Pamela Mink; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Michaela L Tsai
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Why Patients Decline Genomic Sequencing Studies: Experiences from the CSER Consortium.

Authors:  Laura M Amendola; Jill O Robinson; Ragan Hart; Sawona Biswas; Kaitlyn Lee; Barbara A Bernhardt; Kelly East; Marian J Gilmore; Tia L Kauffman; Katie L Lewis; Myra Roche; Sarah Scollon; Julia Wynn; Carrie Blout
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Withdrawal from genetic counselling for cancer.

Authors:  Eveline Bleiker; Gea Wigbout; Anja van Rens; Senno Verhoef; Laura Van't Veer; Neil Aaronson
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 2.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.