Literature DB >> 23231122

Assessing the role of spectral and intensity cues in spectral ripple detection and discrimination in cochlear-implant users.

Elizabeth S Anderson1, Andrew J Oxenham, Peggy B Nelson, David A Nelson.   

Abstract

Measures of spectral ripple resolution have become widely used psychophysical tools for assessing spectral resolution in cochlear-implant (CI) listeners. The objective of this study was to compare spectral ripple discrimination and detection in the same group of CI listeners. Ripple detection thresholds were measured over a range of ripple frequencies and were compared to spectral ripple discrimination thresholds previously obtained from the same CI listeners. The data showed that performance on the two measures was correlated, but that individual subjects' thresholds (at a constant spectral modulation depth) for the two tasks were not equivalent. In addition, spectral ripple detection was often found to be possible at higher rates than expected based on the available spectral cues, making it likely that temporal-envelope cues played a role at higher ripple rates. Finally, spectral ripple detection thresholds were compared to previously obtained speech-perception measures. Results confirmed earlier reports of a robust relationship between detection of widely spaced ripples and measures of speech recognition. In contrast, intensity difference limens for broadband noise did not correlate with spectral ripple detection measures, suggesting a dissociation between the ability to detect small changes in intensity across frequency and across time.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23231122      PMCID: PMC3529540          DOI: 10.1121/1.4763999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  31 in total

1.  Associations among frequency and temporal resolution and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  J R Dubno; D D Dirks
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1990

2.  Detection of changes in spectral shape: uniform vs. non-uniform background spectra.

Authors:  L R Bernstein; D M Green
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1988-07-15       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Frequency discrimination of complex signals, frequency selectivity, and speech perception in hearing-impaired subjects.

Authors:  J W Horst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition.

Authors:  D J Van Tasell; S D Soli; V M Kirby; G P Widin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Detection of simple and complex changes of spectral shape.

Authors:  L R Bernstein; D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Auditory profile analysis: frequency, phase, and Weber's law.

Authors:  D M Green; C R Mason
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Profile analysis: critical bands and duration.

Authors:  D M Green; C R Mason; G Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  A "rationalized" arcsine transform.

Authors:  G A Studebaker
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-09

10.  Auditory processing of vowels by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  S P Bacon; J F Brandt
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1982-09
View more
  42 in total

1.  Effects of age and hearing mechanism on spectral resolution in normal hearing and cochlear-implanted listeners.

Authors:  David L Horn; Daniel J Dudley; Kavita Dedhia; Kaibao Nie; Ward R Drennan; Jong Ho Won; Jay T Rubinstein; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Clinical assessment of spectral modulation detection for adult cochlear implant recipients: a non-language based measure of performance outcomes.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Andrea Hedley-Williams; Anthony J Spahr
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Acoustic temporal modulation detection in normal-hearing and cochlear implanted listeners: effects of hearing mechanism and development.

Authors:  Min-Hyun Park; Jong Ho Won; David L Horn; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-20

4.  The perception of emotion and focus prosody with varying acoustic cues in cochlear implant simulations with varying filter slopes.

Authors:  Daan J van de Velde; Niels O Schiller; Vincent J van Heuven; Claartje C Levelt; Joost van Ginkel; Mieke Beers; Jeroen J Briaire; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory Enhancement in Cochlear-Implant Users Under Simultaneous and Forward Masking.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-16

6.  Intensity Discrimination and Speech Recognition of Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Colette M McKay; Natalie Rickard; Katherine Henshall
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-17

7.  Speech Perception with Spectrally Non-overlapping Maskers as Measure of Spectral Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Erin R O'Neill; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-11-19

8.  Can unaided non-linguistic measures predict cochlear implant candidacy?

Authors:  Hyun Joon Shim; Jong Ho Won; Il Joon Moon; Elizabeth S Anderson; Ward R Drennan; Nancy E McIntosh; Edward M Weaver; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Validation of a clinical assessment of spectral-ripple resolution for cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Elizabeth S Anderson; Jong Ho Won; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Forward masking patterns by low and high-rate stimulation in cochlear implant users: Differences in masking effectiveness and spread of neural excitation.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong; Susannah Dixon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.