Literature DB >> 15532659

Masker-first advantage for cues in informational masking.

Virginia M Richards1, Rong Huang, Gerald Kidd.   

Abstract

The detectability of a pure-tone signal may be reduced by adding a small number of randomly drawn masker tones remote from the signal frequency, an effect attributed to informational masking. A pretrial cue consisting of either the upcoming signal or masker releases informational masking, but a pretrial cue of the signal-plus-masker stimulus does not. In these experiments the relative potency of pre- and posttrial cues in releasing informational masking was examined. In separate conditions the masker-alone and signal-plus-masker stimuli were cues. The results indicated a masker-first advantage, i.e., sensitivity was superior when a masker cue preceded a yes/no trial interval compared to (a) when a signal-plus-masker preceded the trial, and (b) when either cue type followed the yes/no trial interval. A masker-first advantage was also obtained when the results from a two-interval forced-choice same/different task were examined. In contrast, a masker-first advantage was not obtained when the frequency of the signal to be detected was random. For detection tasks using random multi-tone maskers there may be differences in processing efficiency depending on the order in which stimuli are presented. The "masker-first advantage" may depend, in part, on observers maintaining their attention at the signal frequency.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15532659     DOI: 10.1121/1.1784433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  15 in total

1.  Contextual effects in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Virginia M Richards; Timothy Streeter; Christine R Mason; Rong Huang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory enhancement of increments in spectral amplitude stems from more than one source.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Catherine Semal; Laurent Demany
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-07-06

3.  Adults, but not children, benefit from a pretrial signal cue in a random-frequency, two-tone masker.

Authors:  Angela Yarnell Bonino; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Informational masking release in children and adults.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Sequential effects on the detectability of a tone added to a multitone masker.

Authors:  Xiang Cao; Rong Huang; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The role of masker fringes for the detection of coherent tone pips.

Authors:  Virginia M Richards; Daniel E Shub; Eva Maria Carreira
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The effect of frequency cueing on the perceptual segregation of simultaneous tones: Bottom-up and top-down contributions.

Authors:  Yi Shen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Auditory Enhancement in Cochlear-Implant Users Under Simultaneous and Forward Masking.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-16

9.  Auditory enhancement and the role of spectral resolution in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  New perspectives on the measurement and time course of auditory enhancement.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.