Literature DB >> 29847973

Spectral contrast effects produced by competing speech contexts.

Lei Feng1, Andrew J Oxenham1.   

Abstract

The long-term spectrum of a preceding sentence can alter the perception of a following speech sound in a contrastive manner. This speech context effect contributes to our ability to extract reliable spectral characteristics of the surrounding acoustic environment and to compensate for the voice characteristics of different speakers or spectral colorations in different listening environments to maintain perceptual constancy. The extent to which such effects are mediated by low-level "automatic" processes, or require directed attention, remains unknown. This study investigated spectral context effects by measuring the effects of two competing sentences on the phoneme category boundary between /i/ and /ε/ in a following target word, while directing listeners' attention to one or the other context sentence. Spatial separation of the context sentences was achieved either by presenting them to different ears, or by presenting them to both ears but imposing an interaural time difference (ITD) between the ears. The results confirmed large context effects based on ear of presentation. Smaller effects were observed based on either ITD or attention. The results, combined with predictions from a two-stage model, suggest that ear-specific factors dominate speech context effects but that the effects can be modulated by higher-level features, such as perceived location, and by attention. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29847973      PMCID: PMC6110988          DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  27 in total

1.  Neighboring spectral content influences vowel identification.

Authors:  L L Holt; A J Lotto; K R Kluender
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Behavioral examinations of the level of auditory processing of speech context effects.

Authors:  Lori L Holt; Andrew J Lotto
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Young infants' perception of liquid coarticulatory influences on following stop consonants.

Authors:  C A Fowler; C T Best; G W McRoberts
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-12

4.  Vowel enhancement effects in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Ningyuan Wang; Heather Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Acoustic Context Alters Vowel Categorization in Perception of Noise-Vocoded Speech.

Authors:  Christian E Stilp
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-09

6.  Forward masking by enhanced components in harmonic complexes.

Authors:  N F Viemeister; S P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  On the role of formant transitions in vowel recognition.

Authors:  B E Lindblom; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1967-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The use of acoustic cues for phonetic identification: effects of spectral degradation and electric hearing.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Monita Chatterjee; William J Idsardi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.482

9.  Constraints on the processes responsible for the extrinsic normalization of vowels.

Authors:  Matthias J Sjerps; Holger Mitterer; James M McQueen
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Interaction between attention and bottom-up saliency mediates the representation of foreground and background in an auditory scene.

Authors:  Mounya Elhilali; Juanjuan Xiang; Shihab A Shamma; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effects of spectral resolution on spectral contrast effects in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spectral Contrast Effects Reveal Different Acoustic Cues for Vowel Recognition in Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Neural auditory contrast enhancement in humans.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Encoding speech rate in challenging listening conditions: White noise and reverberation.

Authors:  Eva Reinisch; Hans Rutger Bosker
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 2.157

5.  Temporal contrast effects in human speech perception are immune to selective attention.

Authors:  Hans Rutger Bosker; Matthias J Sjerps; Eva Reinisch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Adaptive auditory brightness perception.

Authors:  Kai Siedenburg; Feline Malin Barg; Henning Schepker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.