Literature DB >> 29495696

Auditory enhancement under simultaneous masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Heather A Kreft1, Magdalena Wojtczak1, Andrew J Oxenham1.   

Abstract

Auditory enhancement, where a target sound within a masker is rendered more audible by the prior presentation of the masker alone, may play an important role in auditory perception under variable everyday acoustic conditions. Cochlear hearing loss may reduce enhancement effects, potentially contributing to the difficulties experienced by hearing-impaired (HI) individuals in noisy and reverberant environments. However, it remains unknown whether, and by how much, enhancement under simultaneous masking is reduced in HI listeners. Enhancement of a pure tone under simultaneous masking with a multi-tone masker was measured in HI listeners and age-matched normal-hearing (NH) listeners as function of the spectral notch width of the masker, using stimuli at equal sensation levels as well as at equal sound pressure levels, but with the stimuli presented in noise to the NH listeners to maintain the equal sensation level between listener groups. The results showed that HI listeners exhibited some enhancement in all conditions. However, even when conditions were made as comparable as possible, in terms of effective spectral notch width and presentation level, the enhancement effect in HI listeners under simultaneous masking was reduced relative to that observed in NH listeners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29495696      PMCID: PMC5811308          DOI: 10.1121/1.5023687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  38 in total

1.  Inter-relationship between different psychoacoustic measures assumed to be related to the cochlear active mechanism.

Authors:  B C Moore; D A Vickers; C J Plack; A J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Responses to sound of the basilar membrane of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  M A Ruggero
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Factors influencing temporal effects with notched-noise maskers.

Authors:  M L Hicks; S P Bacon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Auditory enhancement of increments in spectral amplitude stems from more than one source.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Catherine Semal; Laurent Demany
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-07-06

5.  Age-related cochlear synaptopathy: an early-onset contributor to auditory functional decline.

Authors:  Yevgeniya Sergeyenko; Kumud Lall; M Charles Liberman; Sharon G Kujawa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Provide No Evidence for the Role of Efferents in the Enhancement Effect.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Maxwell Elliott; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-08

7.  The auditory enhancement effect is not reflected in the 80-Hz auditory steady-state response.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Christopher J Plack; Arthur Portron; Catherine Semal; Laurent Demany
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-21

8.  Two-tone suppression and distortion production on the basilar membrane in the hook region of cat and guinea pig cochleae.

Authors:  W S Rhode; N P Cooper
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Furosemide alters organ of corti mechanics: evidence for feedback of outer hair cells upon the basilar membrane.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; N C Rich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Predicting the Perceptual Consequences of Hidden Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more
  2 in total

1.  Auditory enhancement under forward masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spectral Contrast Effects Reveal Different Acoustic Cues for Vowel Recognition in Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.