Literature DB >> 24845402

The auditory enhancement effect is not reflected in the 80-Hz auditory steady-state response.

Samuele Carcagno1, Christopher J Plack, Arthur Portron, Catherine Semal, Laurent Demany.   

Abstract

The perceptual salience of a target tone presented in a multitone background is increased by the presentation of a precursor sound consisting of the multitone background alone. It has been proposed that this "enhancement" phenomenon results from an effective amplification of the neural response to the target tone. In this study, we tested this hypothesis in humans, by comparing the auditory steady-state response (ASSR) to a target tone that was enhanced by a precursor sound with the ASSR to a target tone that was not enhanced. In order to record neural responses originating in the brainstem, the ASSR was elicited by amplitude modulating the target tone at a frequency close to 80 Hz. The results did not show evidence of an amplified neural response to enhanced tones. In a control condition, we measured the ASSR to a target tone that, instead of being perceptually enhanced by a precursor sound, was acoustically increased in level. This level increase matched the magnitude of enhancement estimated psychophysically with a forward masking paradigm in a previous experimental phase. We found that the ASSR to the tone acoustically increased in level was significantly greater than the ASSR to the tone enhanced by the precursor sound. Overall, our results suggest that the enhancement effect cannot be explained by an amplified neural response at the level of the brainstem. However, an alternative possibility is that brainstem neurons with enhanced responses do not contribute to the scalp-recorded ASSR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24845402      PMCID: PMC4141439          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-014-0455-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  26 in total

1.  Temporal integration in the human auditory cortex as represented by the development of the steady-state magnetic field.

Authors:  Bernhard Ross; Terence W Picton; Christo Pantev
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Intracerebral sources of human auditory steady-state responses.

Authors:  Anthony T Herdman; Otavio Lins; Patricia Van Roon; David R Stapells; Michael Scherg; Terence W Picton
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Temporal decline of masking and comodulation detection differences.

Authors:  D McFadden; B A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory enhancement of increments in spectral amplitude stems from more than one source.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Catherine Semal; Laurent Demany
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-07-06

5.  The enhancement effect: evidence for adaptation of inhibition using a binaural centering task.

Authors:  Andrew J Byrne; Mark A Stellmack; Neal F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Steady-state MEG responses elicited by a sequence of amplitude-modulated short tones of different carrier frequencies.

Authors:  Shinya Kuriki; Yusuke Kobayashi; Takanari Kobayashi; Keita Tanaka; Yoshinori Uchikawa
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Auditory enhancement of changes in spectral amplitude.

Authors:  Q Summerfield; A Sidwell; T Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  An experimental study on the generator of amplitude-modulation following response.

Authors:  T Kiren; M Aoyagi; H Furuse; Y Koike
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1994

9.  Responses of young and aged rat inferior colliculus neurons to sinusoidally amplitude modulated stimuli.

Authors:  P Shaddock Palombi; P M Backoff; D M Caspary
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  The temporal effect with notched-noise maskers: analysis in terms of input-output functions.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  7 in total

1.  Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Provide No Evidence for the Role of Efferents in the Enhancement Effect.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Maxwell Elliott; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-08

2.  The effect of frequency cueing on the perceptual segregation of simultaneous tones: Bottom-up and top-down contributions.

Authors:  Yi Shen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory Enhancement in Cochlear-Implant Users Under Simultaneous and Forward Masking.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-16

Review 4.  Evidence against attentional state modulating scalp-recorded auditory brainstem steady-state responses.

Authors:  Leonard Varghese; Hari M Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Auditory enhancement under simultaneous masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Magdalena Wojtczak; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  New perspectives on the measurement and time course of auditory enhancement.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Neural auditory contrast enhancement in humans.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.