Literature DB >> 28287916

The Effect of Contrast Material on Radiation Dose at CT: Part II. A Systematic Evaluation across 58 Patient Models.

Pooyan Sahbaee1, Ehsan Abadi1, W Paul Segars1, Daniele Marin1, Rendon C Nelson1, Ehsan Samei1.   

Abstract

Purpose To estimate the radiation dose as a result of contrast medium administration in a typical abdominal computed tomographic (CT) examination across a library of contrast material-enhanced computational patient models. Materials and Methods In part II of this study, first, the technique described in part I of this study was applied to enhance the extended cardiac-torso models with patient-specific iodine-time profiles reflecting the administration of contrast material. Second, the patient models were deployed to assess the patient-specific organ dose as a function of time in a typical abdominal CT examination using Monte Carlo simulation. In this hypothesis-generating study, organ dose refers to the total energy deposited in the unit mass of the tissue inclusive of iodine. Third, a study was performed as a strategy to anticipate the biologically relevant dose (absorbed dose to tissue) in highly perfused organs such as the liver and kidney. The time-varying organ-dose increment values relative to those for unenhanced CT examinations were reported. Results The results from the patient models subjected to the injection protocol indicated up to a total 53%, 30%, 35%, 54%, 27%, 18%, 17%, and 24% increase in radiation dose delivered to the heart, spleen, liver, kidneys, stomach, colon, small intestine, and pancreas, respectively. The biologically relevant dose increase with respect to the dose at an unenhanced CT examination was in the range of 0%-18% increase for the liver and 27% for the kidney across 58 patient models. Conclusion The administration of contrast medium increases the total radiation dose. However, radiation dose, while relevant to be included in estimating the risk associated with contrast-enhanced CT, may still not fully characterize the total biologic effects. Therefore, given the fact that many CT diagnostic decisions would be impossible without the use of iodine, this study suggests the need to consider the effect of iodinated contrast material on the organ doses to patients undergoing CT studies when designing CT protocols. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28287916      PMCID: PMC5452877          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017152852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  25 in total

1.  The presence of iodinated contrast agents amplifies DNA radiation damage in computed tomography.

Authors:  Caroline Pathe; Katharina Eble; Daniel Schmitz-Beuting; Boris Keil; Bjoern Kaestner; Maximilian Voelker; Beate Kleb; Klaus J Klose; Johannes T Heverhagen
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Achieving routine submillisievert CT scanning: report from the summit on management of radiation dose in CT.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Guang Hong Chen; Willi Kalender; Shuai Leng; Ehsan Samei; Katsuyuki Taguchi; Ge Wang; Lifeng Yu; Roderic I Pettigrew
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  A monte carlo comparison of three different media for contrast enhanced radiotherapy of the prostate.

Authors:  H M Garnica-Garza
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-06

4.  The feasibility of a scanner-independent technique to estimate organ dose from MDCT scans: using CTDIvol to account for differences between scanners.

Authors:  Adam C Turner; Maria Zankl; John J DeMarco; Chris H Cagnon; Di Zhang; Erin Angel; Dianna D Cody; Donna M Stevens; Cynthia H McCollough; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  The effect of angular and longitudinal tube current modulations on the estimation of organ and effective doses in x-ray computed tomography.

Authors:  Marcel van Straten; Paul Deak; Paul C Shrimpton; Willi A Kalender
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  First radiotherapy of human metastatic brain tumors delivered by a computerized tomography scanner (CTRx).

Authors:  J H Rose; A Norman; M Ingram; C Aoki; T Solberg; A Mesa
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Treatment plans optimization for contrast-enhanced synchrotron stereotactic radiotherapy.

Authors:  M Edouard; D Broggio; Y Prezado; F Estève; H Elleaume; J F Adam
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  FASH and MASH: female and male adult human phantoms based on polygon mesh surfaces: I. Development of the anatomy.

Authors:  V F Cassola; V J de Melo Lima; R Kramer; H J Khoury
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  The UF family of reference hybrid phantoms for computational radiation dosimetry.

Authors:  Choonsik Lee; Daniel Lodwick; Jorge Hurtado; Deanna Pafundi; Jonathan L Williams; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  Contrast media and the kidney: European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines.

Authors:  H S Thomsen; S K Morcos
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.039

View more
  16 in total

1.  The Effect of Iodine-based Contrast Material on Radiation Dose at CT: It's Complicated.

Authors:  John M Boone; Andrew M Hernandez
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Enhanced radiation dose and DNA damage associated with iodinated contrast media in diagnostic X-ray imaging.

Authors:  Richard Harbron; Elizabeth A Ainsbury; Simon D Bouffler; Rick J Tanner; Jonathan S Eakins; Mark S Pearce
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Patient-Specific Organ and Effective Dose Estimates in Adult Oncologic CT.

Authors:  Yiming Gao; Usman Mahmood; Tianyu Liu; Brian Quinn; Marc J Gollub; X George Xu; Lawrence T Dauer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Dosimetric impact of contrast-enhanced 4d computed tomography for stereotactic body radiation therapy of hepatocelluar carcinoma.

Authors:  Rose Kamal; Deepak Thaper; Rishabh Kumar; Gaganpreet Singh; Hanuman P Yadav; Arun S Oinam; Vivek Kumar; Hitesh Sharma
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2021-08-12

5.  Potential increase in radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks with higher doses of iodine contrast during coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Toon Van Cauteren; Kaoru Tanaka; Dries Belsack; Gert Van Gompel; Veerle Kersemans; Kristin Jochmans; Steven Droogmans; Johan de Mey; Nico Buls
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 4.506

6.  Anatomically and physiologically informed computational model of hepatic contrast perfusion for virtual imaging trials.

Authors:  Thomas J Sauer; Ehsan Abadi; Paul Segars; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 4.506

7.  Personalized administration of contrast medium with high delivery rate in low tube voltage coronary computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Sock Keow Tan; Kwan Hoong Ng; Chai Hong Yeong; Raja Rizal Azman Raja Aman; Fadhli Mohamed Sani; Yang Faridah Abdul Aziz; Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-04

8.  Improved enhancement in CT angiography with reduced contrast media iodine concentrations at constant iodine dose.

Authors:  Toon Van Cauteren; Gert Van Gompel; Koenraad H Nieboer; Inneke Willekens; Paul Evans; Sven Macholl; Steven Droogmans; Johan de Mey; Nico Buls
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Effect of Iodine-based Contrast Material on Radiation Dose at CT.

Authors:  Ehsan Abadi; Pooyan Sahbaee; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Effect of contrast material injection duration on arterial enhancement at CT in patients with various cardiac indices: Analysis using computer simulation.

Authors:  Toru Higaki; Takeshi Nakaura; Masafumi Kidoh; Hideaki Yuki; Yasuyuki Yamashita; Yuko Nakamura; Fuminari Tatsugami; Yasutaka Baba; Makoto Iida; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.