Literature DB >> 20009183

FASH and MASH: female and male adult human phantoms based on polygon mesh surfaces: I. Development of the anatomy.

V F Cassola1, V J de Melo Lima, R Kramer, H J Khoury.   

Abstract

Among computational models, voxel phantoms based on computer tomographic (CT), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) or colour photographic images of patients, volunteers or cadavers have become popular in recent years. Although being true to nature representations of scanned individuals, voxel phantoms have limitations, especially when walled organs have to be segmented or when volumes of organs or body tissues, like adipose, have to be changed. Additionally, the scanning of patients or volunteers is usually made in supine position, which causes a shift of internal organs towards the ribcage, a compression of the lungs and a reduction of the sagittal diameter especially in the abdominal region compared to the regular anatomy of a person in the upright position, which in turn can influence organ and tissue absorbed or equivalent dose estimates. This study applies tools developed recently in the areas of computer graphics and animated films to the creation and modelling of 3D human organs, tissues, skeletons and bodies based on polygon mesh surfaces. Female and male adult human phantoms, called FASH (Female Adult meSH) and MASH (Male Adult meSH), have been designed using software, such as MakeHuman, Blender, Binvox and ImageJ, based on anatomical atlases, observing at the same time organ masses recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection for the male and female reference adult in report no 89. 113 organs, bones and tissues have been modelled in the FASH and the MASH phantoms representing locations for adults in standing posture. Most organ and tissue masses of the voxelized versions agree with corresponding data from ICRP89 within a margin of 2.6%. Comparison with the mesh-based male RPI_AM and female RPI_AF phantoms shows differences with respect to the material used, to the software and concepts applied, and to the anatomies created.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20009183     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/1/009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  15 in total

1.  Comment on "Hybrid computational phantoms for medical dose reconstruction" by Bolch et al.

Authors:  Richard Kramer; Vagner Cassola
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  DukeSim: A Realistic, Rapid, and Scanner-Specific Simulation Framework in Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Ehsan Abadi; Brian Harrawood; Shobhit Sharma; Anuj Kapadia; William P Segars; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Organ doses for reference adult male and female undergoing computed tomography estimated by Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Choonsik Lee; Kwang Pyo Kim; Daniel Long; Ryan Fisher; Chris Tien; Steven L Simon; Andre Bouville; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Quantitative method for in vitro matrigel invasiveness measurement through image analysis software.

Authors:  Gabriel Gallo-Oller; Juan A Rey; Javier Dotor; Javier S Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 5.  An exponential growth of computational phantom research in radiation protection, imaging, and radiotherapy: a review of the fifty-year history.

Authors:  X George Xu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  The Effect of Contrast Material on Radiation Dose at CT: Part I. Incorporation of Contrast Material Dynamics in Anthropomorphic Phantoms.

Authors:  Pooyan Sahbaee; W Paul Segars; Daniele Marin; Rendon C Nelson; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Deformable torso phantoms of Chinese adults for personalized anatomy modelling.

Authors:  Hongkai Wang; Xiaobang Sun; Tongning Wu; Congsheng Li; Zhonghua Chen; Meiying Liao; Mengci Li; Wen Yan; Hui Huang; Jia Yang; Ziyu Tan; Libo Hui; Yue Liu; Hang Pan; Yue Qu; Zhaofeng Chen; Liwen Tan; Lijuan Yu; Hongcheng Shi; Li Huo; Yanjun Zhang; Xin Tang; Shaoxiang Zhang; Changjian Liu
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk estimation in CT: part II. Application to patients.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Ehsan Samei; W Paul Segars; Gregory M Sturgeon; James G Colsher; Greta Toncheva; Terry T Yoshizumi; Donald P Frush
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Comparison of internal dosimetry factors for three classes of adult computational phantoms with emphasis on I-131 in the thyroid.

Authors:  Stephanie Lamart; Andre Bouville; Steven L Simon; Keith F Eckerman; Dunstana Melo; Choonsik Lee
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  The Effect of Contrast Material on Radiation Dose at CT: Part II. A Systematic Evaluation across 58 Patient Models.

Authors:  Pooyan Sahbaee; Ehsan Abadi; W Paul Segars; Daniele Marin; Rendon C Nelson; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.