Literature DB >> 22144029

The presence of iodinated contrast agents amplifies DNA radiation damage in computed tomography.

Caroline Pathe1, Katharina Eble, Daniel Schmitz-Beuting, Boris Keil, Bjoern Kaestner, Maximilian Voelker, Beate Kleb, Klaus J Klose, Johannes T Heverhagen.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of iodinated contrast agents on the formation of DNA double-strand breaks in vitro in lymphocytes and to verify these results in patients undergoing diagnostic computed tomography examinations. Blood samples were irradiated in vitro in the presence of iodinated X-ray contrast agent. Controls were irradiated without contrast agent. Fourteen patients were investigated using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), and 14 other patients with unenhanced CT. Blood samples were taken prior to and 5 min and 1, 2 and 24 h after the CT examination. In these blood samples the average number of γH2Ax-foci per lymphocyte was enumerated by fluorescence microscopy. Statistical differences between foci numbers developed in the presence and absence of contrast agent were tested using an independent sample t-test. In vitro foci numbers after irradiation were significantly higher when contrast agent was present during irradiation. In vivo, γH2Ax-foci levels were 58% higher in patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT compared with those undergoing unenhanced CT. In the presence of iodinated contrast agents DNA, damage is increased and the radiation dose is not the only factor affecting the amount of DNA damage. Individual patient characteristics and biological dosimetry applications, e.g. the analysis of γH2Ax-foci, have to be considered.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22144029     DOI: 10.1002/cmmi.453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1555-4309            Impact factor:   3.161


  17 in total

1.  Biodegradable iodinated polydisulfides as contrast agents for CT angiography.

Authors:  Erlei Jin; Zheng-Rong Lu
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  CT Scanning: Is the Contrast Material Enhancing the Radiation Dose and Cancer Risk as Well as the Image?

Authors:  Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Ruth A Kleinerman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Improved identification of DNA double strand breaks: γ-H2AX-epitope visualization by confocal microscopy and 3D reconstructed images.

Authors:  Nico Ruprecht; Martin N Hungerbühler; Ingrid B Böhm; Johannes T Heverhagen
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2019-02-24       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Ultra-low dose contrast CT pulmonary angiography in oncology patients using a high-pitch helical dual-source technology.

Authors:  Prabhakar Rajiah; Leslie Ciancibello; Ronald Novak; Jennifer Sposato; Luis Landeras; Robert Gilkeson
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 5.  Application of the 4-D XCAT Phantoms in Biomedical Imaging and Beyond.

Authors:  W Paul Segars; B M W Tsui; George S K Fung; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  The Effect of Contrast Material on Radiation Dose at CT: Part I. Incorporation of Contrast Material Dynamics in Anthropomorphic Phantoms.

Authors:  Pooyan Sahbaee; W Paul Segars; Daniele Marin; Rendon C Nelson; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Enhanced radiation dose and DNA damage associated with iodinated contrast media in diagnostic X-ray imaging.

Authors:  Richard Harbron; Elizabeth A Ainsbury; Simon D Bouffler; Rick J Tanner; Jonathan S Eakins; Mark S Pearce
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  Multiplexed imaging in oncology.

Authors:  Chrysafis Andreou; Ralph Weissleder; Moritz F Kircher
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 25.671

9.  Potential increase in radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks with higher doses of iodine contrast during coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Toon Van Cauteren; Kaoru Tanaka; Dries Belsack; Gert Van Gompel; Veerle Kersemans; Kristin Jochmans; Steven Droogmans; Johan de Mey; Nico Buls
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 4.506

10.  The Effect of Contrast Material on Radiation Dose at CT: Part II. A Systematic Evaluation across 58 Patient Models.

Authors:  Pooyan Sahbaee; Ehsan Abadi; W Paul Segars; Daniele Marin; Rendon C Nelson; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.