Literature DB >> 28251079

Corneal biomechanical data and biometric parameters measured with Scheimpflug-based devices on normal corneas.

Gabor Nemeth1, Eszter Szalai2, Ziad Hassan3, Agnes Lipecz2, Zsuzsa Flasko2, Laszlo Modis2.   

Abstract

AIM: To analyze the correlations between ocular biomechanical and biometric data of the eye, measured by Scheimpflug-based devices on healthy subjects.
METHODS: Three consecutive measurements were carried out using the corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology (CorVis ST) device on healthy eyes and the 10 device-specific parameters were recorded. Pentacam HR-derived parameters (corneal curvature radii on the anterior and posterior surfaces; apical pachymetry; corneal volume; corneal aberration data; depth, volume and angle of the anterior chamber) and axial length (AL) from IOLMaster were correlated with the 10 specific CorVis ST parameters.
RESULTS: Measurements were conducted in 43 eyes of 43 volunteers (age 61.24±15.72y). The 10 specific CorVis ST data showed significant relationships with corneal curvature radii both on the anterior and posterior surface, pachymetric data, root mean square (RMS) data of lower-order aberrations, and posterior RMS of higher-order aberrations and spherical aberration of the posterior cornea. Anterior chamber depth showed a significant relationship, but there were no significant correlations between corneal volume, anterior chamber volume, mean chamber angle or AL and the 10 specific CorVis ST parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: CorVis ST-generated parameters are influenced by corneal curvature radii, some corneal RMS data, but corneal volume, anterior chamber volume, chamber angle and AL have no correlation with the biomechanical parameters. The parameters measured by CorVis ST seem to refer mostly to corneal properties of the eye.

Keywords:  Ocular Response Analyzer; anterior segment parameters; biomechanics; corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology

Year:  2017        PMID: 28251079      PMCID: PMC5313543          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2017.02.06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  36 in total

1.  Corneal biomechanics, refractive error, and axial length in Chinese primary school children.

Authors:  Yuqiang Huang; Chukai Huang; Liping Li; Kunliang Qiu; Weifen Gong; Zhenmao Wang; Xuefen Wu; Yali Du; Bin Chen; Dennis S C Lam; Mingzhi Zhang; Nathan Congdon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer.

Authors:  David A Luce
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Corneal-thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution: tomographic indices to detect keratoconus.

Authors:  Renato Ambrósio; Ruiz Simonato Alonso; Allan Luz; Luis Guillermo Coca Velarde
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Detection of biomechanical changes after corneal cross-linking using Ocular Response Analyzer software.

Authors:  Eberhard Spoerl; Naim Terai; Freia Scholz; Frederik Raiskup; Lutz E Pillunat
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  In vivo biomechanical changes after corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: 1-year analysis of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial.

Authors:  Steven A Greenstein; Kristen L Fry; Peter S Hersh
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure with the Ocular Response Analyzer in childhood myopia.

Authors:  Pei-Yao Chang; Shu-Wen Chang; Jiun-Yi Wang
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Corneal hysteresis and axial length among Chinese secondary school children: the Xichang Pediatric Refractive Error Study (X-PRES) report no. 4.

Authors:  Yue Song; Nathan Congdon; Liping Li; Zhongxia Zhou; Kai Choi; Dennis S C Lam; Chi Pui Pang; Zhenling Xie; Xueyu Liu; Abhishek Sharma; Weihong Chen; Mingzhi Zhang
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Anterior-segment morphology and corneal biomechanical characteristics in pigmentary glaucoma.

Authors:  Annemarie Klingenstein; Marcus Kernt; Florian Seidensticker; Anselm Kampik; Christoph Hirneiss
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-12-24

9.  The biomechanical properties of the cornea and anterior segment parameters.

Authors:  Ho Sik Hwang; Seh Kwang Park; Man Soo Kim
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 2.209

10.  Evaluation of corneal deformation analyzed with Scheimpflug based device in healthy eyes and diseased ones.

Authors:  Michele Lanza; Michela Cennamo; Stefania Iaccarino; Carlo Irregolare; Miguel Rechichi; Mario Bifani; Ugo Antonello Gironi Carnevale
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  [Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer (Corvis ST) for measurement of corneal biomechanical parameters : A praxis-related overview].

Authors:  R Herber; N Terai; K R Pillunat; F Raiskup; L E Pillunat; E Spörl
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Evaluation of Corvis ST tonometer with the updated software in glaucoma practice.

Authors:  Ioannis Halkiadakis; Vasilios Tzimis; Alexandros Gryparis; Ioannis Markopoulos; Vasiliki Konstadinidou; Elias Zintzaras; Michalis Tzakos
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Determine Corneal Biomechanical Parameters by Finite Element Simulation and Parametric Analysis Based on ORA Measurements.

Authors:  Xiao Qin; Lei Tian; Hui Zhang; Di Zhang; Ying Jie; Hai-Xia Zhang; Lin Li
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-13

4.  Correlation Between Anterior Chamber Volume and Corneal Biomechanical Properties in Human Eyes.

Authors:  Xinhan Cui; Yujing Yang; Yue Li; Feifei Huang; Yujin Zhao; Huiyu Chen; Jianjiang Xu; Alireza Mashaghi; Jiaxu Hong
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-12-03

5.  Correlation between corneal thickness, keratometry, age, and differential pressure difference in healthy eyes.

Authors:  Ahmet Colakoglu; Iffet Emel Colakoglu; Cemile Banu Cosar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A Potential Screening Index of Corneal Biomechanics in Healthy Subjects, Forme Fruste Keratoconus Patients and Clinical Keratoconus Patients.

Authors:  Lei Tian; Xiao Qin; Hui Zhang; Di Zhang; Li-Li Guo; Hai-Xia Zhang; Ying Wu; Ying Jie; Lin Li
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-12-23

7.  In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Properties in a Selected Chinese Population, Measured Using the Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology.

Authors:  Yuxin Li; Lei Tian; Li-Li Guo; Yiran Hao; Ying Jie
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-13

8.  Age distribution and associated factors of cornea biomechanical parameter stress-strain index in Chinese healthy population.

Authors:  Guihua Liu; Hua Rong; Ruxia Pei; Bei Du; Nan Jin; Di Wang; Chengcheng Jin; Ruihua Wei
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.209

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.