Literature DB >> 33603061

Correlation between corneal thickness, keratometry, age, and differential pressure difference in healthy eyes.

Ahmet Colakoglu1, Iffet Emel Colakoglu2, Cemile Banu Cosar3.   

Abstract

To determine the use of differential pressure difference (DPD), in air-puff differential tonometry, as a potential biomechanical measure of the cornea and elucidate its relationship with the intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and age. This study comprised 396 eyes from 198 patients and was conducted at Acibadem University, School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Istanbul, Turkey. The central corneal curvature and refraction of the eyes were measured using an Auto Kerato-Refractometer (KR-1; Topcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). IOP and central corneal thickness were measured using a tono-pachymeter (CT-1P; Topcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), wherein two separate readings of IOP were obtained using two different modes: 1-30 and 1-60. The difference between these two readings was recorded as the DPD. The factors affecting the DPD were determined by stepwise multiple linear regression analysis. DPD varied over a dynamic range of - 3.0 to + 5.0 mmHg and was weakly correlated with the central corneal thickness (r = 0.115, p < 0.05). DPD showed no significant correlation with IOP 1-30 (p > 0.05). A weak but statistically significant (p < 0.05) positive correlation of DPD was observed with age (r = 0.123), Kavg (r = 0.102), and the CCT (r = 0.115). There was a significant correlation between DPD and Kavg, CCT, and age. There was no significant correlation between DPD and IOP 1-30. Age-related changes in the corneal ultrastructure may be a plausible explanation for the weak positive association between age and DPD. The proposed method may prove a valid non-invasive tool for the evaluation of corneal biomechanics and introduce DPD in the decision-making of routine clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33603061      PMCID: PMC7893151          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83683-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  50 in total

1.  The validity of a new noncontact tonometer and its comparison with the Goldmann tonometer.

Authors:  Andrew K C Lam; Rufina Chan; Chin-hang Lam
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK.

Authors:  Dimitrios S Siganos; Georgios I Papastergiou; Carlos Moedas
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure differences between an air-puff tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.

Authors:  Laura Tranchina; Marco Lombardo; Francesco Oddone; Sebastiano Serrao; Domenico Schiano Lomoriello; Pietro Ducoli
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2013 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Assessment of the accuracy and reliability of the Topcon CT80 non-contact tonometer.

Authors:  Kelechi C Ogbuehi
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.742

5.  Non-invasive in vivo measurement of ocular rigidity: Clinical validation, repeatability and method improvement.

Authors:  Diane N Sayah; Javier Mazzaferri; Pierre Ghesquière; Renaud Duval; Flavio Rezende; Santiago Costantino; Mark R Lesk
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.467

6.  Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer.

Authors:  Aachal Kotecha; Ahmed Elsheikh; Cynthia R Roberts; Haogang Zhu; David F Garway-Heath
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 7.  Corneal hysteresis and glaucoma.

Authors:  Liang Liang; Ran Zhang; Li-Ye He
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  Comparative evaluation of intraocular pressure with an air-puff tonometer versus a Goldmann applanation tonometer.

Authors:  Qasim K Farhood
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-27

9.  In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Properties with Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology in Chinese Population.

Authors:  Ying Wu; Lei Tian; Yi-Fei Huang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  A Review of Structural and Biomechanical Changes in the Cornea in Aging, Disease, and Photochemical Crosslinking.

Authors:  Brecken J Blackburn; Michael W Jenkins; Andrew M Rollins; William J Dupps
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-03-29
View more
  1 in total

1.  Optical coherence elastography for assessing the influence of intraocular pressure on elastic wave dispersion in the cornea.

Authors:  Michael G Sun; Taeyoon Son; Joseph Crutison; Victor Guaiquil; Shujun Lin; Lara Nammari; Dieter Klatt; Xincheng Yao; Mark I Rosenblatt; Thomas J Royston
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2022-01-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.