Literature DB >> 28147587

Use of a glimpsing model to understand the performance of listeners with and without hearing loss in spatialized speech mixtures.

Virginia Best1, Christine R Mason1, Jayaganesh Swaminathan1, Elin Roverud1, Gerald Kidd1.   

Abstract

In many situations, listeners with sensorineural hearing loss demonstrate reduced spatial release from masking compared to listeners with normal hearing. This deficit is particularly evident in the "symmetric masker" paradigm in which competing talkers are located to either side of a central target talker. However, there is some evidence that reduced target audibility (rather than a spatial deficit per se) under conditions of spatial separation may contribute to the observed deficit. In this study a simple "glimpsing" model (applied separately to each ear) was used to isolate the target information that is potentially available in binaural speech mixtures. Intelligibility of these glimpsed stimuli was then measured directly. Differences between normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners observed in the natural binaural condition persisted for the glimpsed condition, despite the fact that the task no longer required segregation or spatial processing. This result is consistent with the idea that the performance of listeners with hearing loss in the spatialized mixture was limited by their ability to identify the target speech based on sparse glimpses, possibly as a result of some of those glimpses being inaudible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28147587      PMCID: PMC5392092          DOI: 10.1121/1.4973620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  41 in total

1.  Speech segregation based on sound localization.

Authors:  Nicoleta Roman; DeLiang Wang; Guy J Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory localization, detection of spatial separateness, and speech hearing in noise by hearing impaired listeners.

Authors:  W Noble; D Byrne; K Ter-Horst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Predicting the effect of hearing loss and audibility on amplified speech reception in a multi-talker listening scenario.

Authors:  William S Woods; Sridhar Kalluri; Shareka Pentony; Nazanin Nooraei
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Age-related hearing loss and ear morphology affect vertical but not horizontal sound-localization performance.

Authors:  Rik J Otte; Martijn J H Agterberg; Marc M Van Wanrooij; Ad F M Snik; A John Van Opstal
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-01-15

5.  Speech intelligibility in noise: relative contribution of speech elements above and below the noise level.

Authors:  R Drullman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effect of audibility on spatial release from speech-on-speech masking.

Authors:  Helen Glyde; Jörg M Buchholz; Lillian Nielsen; Virginia Best; Harvey Dillon; Sharon Cameron; Louise Hickson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Binaural interaction and localization with various hearing impairments.

Authors:  H S Colburn
Journal:  Scand Audiol Suppl       Date:  1982

8.  Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.

Authors:  DeLiang Wang; Ulrik Kjems; Michael S Pedersen; Jesper B Boldt; Thomas Lunner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Phonemic restoration by hearing-impaired listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Deniz Başkent; Cheryl L Eiler; Brent Edwards
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  The effects of hearing impairment and aging on spatial processing.

Authors:  Helen Glyde; Sharon Cameron; Harvey Dillon; Louise Hickson; Mark Seeto
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  15 in total

1.  Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Virginia Best; Elin Roverud; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Todd Jennings; Kameron Clayton; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The effect of fundamental frequency contour similarity on multi-talker listening in older and younger adults.

Authors:  Peter A Wasiuk; Mathieu Lavandier; Emily Buss; Jacob Oleson; Lauren Calandruccio
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The importance of a broad bandwidth for understanding "glimpsed" speech.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Elin Roverud; Lucas Baltzell; Jan Rennies; Mathieu Lavandier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Can background noise increase the informational masking in a speech mixture?

Authors:  Virginia Best; Christopher Conroy; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Evaluating the Performance of a Visually Guided Hearing Aid Using a Dynamic Auditory-Visual Word Congruence Task.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Virginia Best; Christine R Mason; Timothy Streeter; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 6.  Enhancing Auditory Selective Attention Using a Visually Guided Hearing Aid.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Individual differences in speech intelligibility at a cocktail party: A modeling perspective.

Authors:  Mathieu Lavandier; Christine R Mason; Lucas S Baltzell; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.482

8.  Making sense of periodicity glimpses in a prediction-update-loop-A computational model of attentive voice tracking.

Authors:  Joanna Luberadzka; Hendrik Kayser; Volker Hohmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 2.482

9.  Binaural sensitivity and release from speech-on-speech masking in listeners with and without hearing loss.

Authors:  Lucas S Baltzell; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Adrian Y Cho; Mathieu Lavandier; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Benefits of triple acoustic beamforming during speech-on-speech masking and sound localization for bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  David Yun; Todd R Jennings; Gerald Kidd; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.