Literature DB >> 9348693

Auditory localization, detection of spatial separateness, and speech hearing in noise by hearing impaired listeners.

W Noble1, D Byrne, K Ter-Horst.   

Abstract

In two groups, one with sensorineural and the other with conductive-mixed hearing loss, measures were made of single-source localization and speech intelligibility in both spatially separate and nonseparate noise. There was also a test for detecting when two sounds came from the same location or from separate ones. Localization test results confirmed earlier findings, namely, disruption of vertical plane ability generally, and a further, particular disturbance to horizontal plane localization in the conductive-mixed group. Compared with a normal control group, there were only slight signs of benefit from separation of speech and noise in the region lateral to the listener, and virtually none in the frontal region. The new test, spatial separateness, had elements in common with both of the other tests, and links were observed from localization to separateness detection, and from separateness to benefit from separation of speech and noise. Localization was also related to speech hearing in nonspatially separated noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9348693     DOI: 10.1121/1.419618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  24 in total

1.  Use of a glimpsing model to understand the performance of listeners with and without hearing loss in spatialized speech mixtures.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Christine R Mason; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Elin Roverud; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech intelligibility in free field: spatial unmasking in preschool children.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Examination of the validity of auditory traits and tests.

Authors:  G A Flamme
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2001-09

4.  Optimizing sound localization with hearing AIDS.

Authors:  D Byrne; W Noble
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1998-06

5.  Auditory perception is influenced by the orientation of the trunk relative to a sound source.

Authors:  Chiara Occhigrossi; Michael Brosch; Giorgia Giommetti; Roberto Panichi; Giampietro Ricci; Aldo Ferraresi; Mauro Roscini; Vito Enrico Pettorossi; Mario Faralli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Attenuating the ear canal feedback pressure of a laser-driven hearing aid.

Authors:  Morteza Khaleghi; Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effects of dynamic range compression on spatial selective auditory attention in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Andrew H Schwartz; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Initial development of a spatially separated speech-in-noise and localization training program.

Authors:  Richard S Tyler; Shelley A Witt; Camille C Dunn; Wenjun Wang
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Laboratory and field study of the potential benefits of pinna cue-preserving hearing aids.

Authors:  Niels Søgaard Jensen; Tobias Neher; Søren Laugesen; René Burmand Johannesson; Louise Kragelund
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-11-10

10.  An energetic limit on spatial release from masking.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Eric R Thompson; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.