Literature DB >> 34470293

Individual differences in speech intelligibility at a cocktail party: A modeling perspective.

Mathieu Lavandier1, Christine R Mason2, Lucas S Baltzell2, Virginia Best2.   

Abstract

This study aimed at predicting individual differences in speech reception thresholds (SRTs) in the presence of symmetrically placed competing talkers for young listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. An existing binaural model incorporating the individual audiogram was revised to handle severe hearing losses by (a) taking as input the target speech level at SRT in a given condition and (b) introducing a floor in the model to limit extreme negative better-ear signal-to-noise ratios. The floor value was first set using SRTs measured with stationary and modulated noises. The model was then used to account for individual variations in SRTs found in two previously published data sets that used speech maskers. The model accounted well for the variation in SRTs across listeners with hearing loss, based solely on differences in audibility. When considering listeners with normal hearing, the model could predict the best SRTs, but not the poorer SRTs, suggesting that other factors limit performance when audibility (as measured with the audiogram) is not compromised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34470293      PMCID: PMC8561716          DOI: 10.1121/10.0005851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   2.482


  33 in total

1.  The role of head-induced interaural time and level differences in the speech reception threshold for multiple interfering sound sources.

Authors:  John F Culling; Monica L Hawley; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Binaural prediction of speech intelligibility in reverberant rooms with multiple noise sources.

Authors:  Mathieu Lavandier; Sam Jelfs; John F Culling; Anthony J Watkins; Andrew P Raimond; Simon J Makin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A binaural model implementing an internal noise to predict the effect of hearing impairment on speech intelligibility in non-stationary noises.

Authors:  Thibault Vicente; Mathieu Lavandier; Jörg M Buchholz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The effects of hearing loss and age on the benefit of spatial separation between multiple talkers in reverberant rooms.

Authors:  Nicole Marrone; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Prediction of binaural speech intelligibility against noise in rooms.

Authors:  Mathieu Lavandier; John F Culling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The intelligibility of speech in a harmonic masker varying in fundamental frequency contour, broadband temporal envelope, and spatial location.

Authors:  Thibaud Leclère; Mathieu Lavandier; Mickael L D Deroche
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Better-ear glimpsing at low frequencies in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Baljeet Rana; Jörg M Buchholz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Elin Roverud; Kameron K Clayton; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Impaired speech perception in noise with a normal audiogram: No evidence for cochlear synaptopathy and no relation to lifetime noise exposure.

Authors:  Hannah Guest; Kevin J Munro; Garreth Prendergast; Rebecca E Millman; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Normative Data for a Rapid, Automated Test of Spatial Release From Masking.

Authors:  Kasey M Jakien; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 1.493

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.