Literature DB >> 28134550

Competition in saccade target selection reveals attentional guidance by simultaneously active working memory representations.

Valerie M Beck1, Andrew Hollingworth1.   

Abstract

The content of visual working memory (VWM) guides attention, but whether this interaction is limited to a single VWM representation or functional for multiple VWM representations is under debate. To test this issue, we developed a gaze-contingent search paradigm to directly manipulate selection history and examine the competition between multiple cue-matching saccade target objects. Participants first saw a dual-color cue followed by two pairs of colored objects presented sequentially. For each pair, participants selectively fixated an object that matched one of the cued colors. Critically, for the second pair, the cued color from the first pair was presented either with a new distractor color or with the second cued color. In the latter case, if two cued colors in VWM interact with selection simultaneously, we expected the second cued color object to generate substantial competition for selection, even though the first cued color was used to guide attention in the immediately previous pair. Indeed, in the second pair, selection probability of the first cued color was substantially reduced in the presence of the second cued color. This competition between cue-matching objects provides strong evidence that both VWM representations interacted simultaneously with selection. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28134550      PMCID: PMC5300686          DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  22 in total

1.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Using the dual-target cost to explore the nature of search target representations.

Authors:  Michael J Stroud; Tamaryn Menneer; Kyle R Cave; Nick Donnelly
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Involuntary transfer of a top-down attentional set into the focus of attention: evidence from a contingent attentional capture paradigm.

Authors:  Katherine Sledge Moore; Daniel H Weissman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search.

Authors:  R Houtkamp; P R Roelfsema
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  Different states in visual working memory: when it guides attention and when it does not.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers; Judith Peters; Roos Houtkamp; Pieter R Roelfsema
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Rapid parallel attentional target selection in single-color and multiple-color visual search.

Authors:  Anna Grubert; Martin Eimer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Searching for two things at once: establishment of multiple attentional control settings on a trial-by-trial basis.

Authors:  Zachary J J Roper; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

8.  Visual search and stimulus similarity.

Authors:  J Duncan; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Global visual processing for saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  J M Findlay
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Attentional templates in visual working memory.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Jason T Arita; Deborah Pardo; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  12 in total

1.  The architecture of interaction between visual working memory and visual attention.

Authors:  Brett Bahle; Valerie M Beck; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Whatever you do, don't look at the...: Evaluating guidance by an exclusionary attentional template.

Authors:  Valerie M Beck; Steven J Luck; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Beta and Theta Oscillations Differentially Support Free Versus Forced Control over Multiple-Target Search.

Authors:  Joram van Driel; Eduard Ort; Johannes J Fahrenfort; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Contrasting gist-based and template-based guidance during real-world visual search.

Authors:  Brett Bahle; Michi Matsukura; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking.

Authors:  Katherine S Moore; Elizabeth A Wiemers; Ariel Kershner; Korissa Belville; Jaimie Jasina; Aziza Ransome; Jessica Avanzato
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Lack of Free Choice Reveals the Cost of Having to Search for More Than One Object.

Authors:  Eduard Ort; Johannes J Fahrenfort; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-06-29

Review 7.  Flexibility in Attentional Control: Multiple Sources and Suppression.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2019-03-25

8.  Humans can efficiently look for but not select multiple visual objects.

Authors:  Eduard Ort; Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort; Tuomas Ten Cate; Martin Eimer; Christian Nl Olivers
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Concurrent guidance of attention by multiple working memory items: Behavioral and computational evidence.

Authors:  Cherie Zhou; Monicque M Lorist; Sebastiaan Mathôt
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Attentional Guidance from Multiple Working Memory Representations: Evidence from Eye Movements.

Authors:  Bao Zhang; Shuhui Liu; Mattia Doro; Giovanni Galfano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.