Literature DB >> 20675796

Involuntary transfer of a top-down attentional set into the focus of attention: evidence from a contingent attentional capture paradigm.

Katherine Sledge Moore1, Daniel H Weissman.   

Abstract

In the present study, we investigated whether involuntarily directing attention to a target-colored distractor causes the corresponding attentional set to enter a limited-capacity focus of attention, thereby facilitating the identification of a subsequent target whose color matches the same attentional set. As predicted, in Experiment 1, contingent attentional capture effects from a target-colored distractor were only one half to one third as large when subsequent target identification relied on the same (vs. a different) attentional set. In Experiment 2, this effect was eliminated when all of the target colors matched the same attentional set, arguing against bottom-up perceptual priming of the distractor's color as an alternative account of our findings. In Experiment 3, this effect was reversed when a target-colored distractor appeared after the target, ruling out a feature-based interference account of our findings. We conclude that capacity limitations in working memory strongly influence contingent attentional capture when multiple attentional sets guide selection.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20675796     DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.6.1495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  14 in total

1.  Limits in feature-based attention to multiple colors.

Authors:  Taosheng Liu; Michael Jigo
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Searching for two things at once: establishment of multiple attentional control settings on a trial-by-trial basis.

Authors:  Zachary J J Roper; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

3.  Competition in saccade target selection reveals attentional guidance by simultaneously active working memory representations.

Authors:  Valerie M Beck; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  On the precision of goal-directed attentional selection.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Whatever you do, don't look at the...: Evaluating guidance by an exclusionary attentional template.

Authors:  Valerie M Beck; Steven J Luck; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Computer mouse tracking reveals motor signatures in a cognitive task of spatial language grounding.

Authors:  Jonas Lins; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Set-specific capture can be reduced by preemptively occupying a limited-capacity focus of attention.

Authors:  Katherine Sledge Moore; Daniel H Weissman
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2011-01-01

8.  Limited featured-based attention to multiple features.

Authors:  Taosheng Liu; Mark W Becker; Michael Jigo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking.

Authors:  Katherine S Moore; Elizabeth A Wiemers; Ariel Kershner; Korissa Belville; Jaimie Jasina; Aziza Ransome; Jessica Avanzato
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  A bottleneck model of set-specific capture.

Authors:  Katherine Sledge Moore; Daniel H Weissman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.