Literature DB >> 6841803

Successive versus simultaneous comparison in auditory intensity discrimination.

D M Green, G Kidd, M C Picardi.   

Abstract

The ability to discriminate between two brief sounds having identical frequency components, but differing in the intensity of one or more of the components, is studied. The stimulus manipulations include randomizing the overall intensity of the sounds, varying the number and spacing of the components, and varying the interval of time between the sounds. The results from the experiment in which interstimulus interval is manipulated clearly support a profile analysis mechanism that computes two rough spectral analyses, stores a classification of these spectra in memory, and compares the two stores. This profile mechanism involves a simultaneous comparison of different components of the complex, some remote from the signal frequency, rather than a successive comparison of the difference in intensity at the signal frequency. The simultaneous comparison process is more sensitive when the profile is composed of many components spaced over a wide frequency range.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6841803     DOI: 10.1121/1.389009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Evidence of across-channel processing for spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Gary L Jones; Ward R Drennan; Elyse M Jameyson; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Exploring the source of the mid-level hump for intensity discrimination in quiet and the effects of noise.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Analysis of spectral shape in the barn owl auditory system.

Authors:  U Langemann; M A Zokoll; G M Klump
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  The perceptual segregation of simultaneous auditory signals: pulse train segregation and vowel segregation.

Authors:  M H Chalikia; A S Bregman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-11

5.  Minimal spectral contrast of formant peaks for vowel recognition as a function of spectral slope.

Authors:  A P Lea; Q Summerfield
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-10

6.  Formant-frequency discrimination of synthesized vowels in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and humans.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kassidy N Amburgey; Kristina S Abrams; Fabio Idrobo; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Detection of tones in reproducible noise maskers by rabbits and comparison to detection by humans.

Authors:  Yan Gai; Laurel H Carney; Kristina S Abrams; Fabio Idrobo; J Michael Harrison; Robert H Gilkey
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-09-25

8.  Comparing auditory filter bandwidths, spectral ripple modulation detection, spectral ripple discrimination, and speech recognition: Normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Evelyn Davies-Venn; Peggy Nelson; Pamela Souza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.