Literature DB >> 2247326

The effect of vibrato on the recognition of masked vowels.

L Demany1, C Semal.   

Abstract

Five experiments on the identifiability of synthetic vowels masked by wideband sounds are reported. In each experiment, identification thresholds (signal/masker ratios, in decibels) were measured for two versions of four vowels: a vibrated version, in which FO varied sinusoidally around 100 Hz; and a steady version, in which F0 was fixed at 100 Hz. The first three experiments were performed on naive subjects. Experiment 1 showed that for maskers consisting of bursts of pink noise, vibrato had no effect on thresholds. In Experiment 2, where the maskers were periodic pulse trains with an F0 randomly varied between 120 and 140 Hz from trial to trial, vibrato slightly improved thresholds when the sound pressure level of the maskers was 40 dB, but had no effect for 65-dB maskers. In Experiment 3, vibrated rather than steady pulse trains were used as maskers; when these maskers were at 40 dB, the vibrated versions of the vowels were slightly less identifiable than their steady versions; but, as in Experiment 2, vibrato had no effect when the maskers were at 65 dB. Experiment 4 showed that the unmasking effect of vibrato found in Experiment 2 disappeared in subjects trained in the identification task. Finally, Experiment 5 indicated that in trained listeners, vibrato had no influence on identification performance even when the maskers and the vowels had synchronous onsets and offsets. We conclude that vibrating a vowel masked by a wideband sound can affect its identification threshold, but only for tonal maskers and in untrained listeners. This effect of vibrato should probably be considered as a Gestalt phenomenon originating from central auditory mechanisms.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2247326     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  8 in total

1.  Segregation of concurrent sounds. II: Effects of spectral envelope tracing, frequency modulation coherence, and frequency modulation width.

Authors:  C M Marin; S McAdams
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Segregation of concurrent sounds. I: Effects of frequency modulation coherence.

Authors:  S McAdams
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Frequency modulation characteristics of sustained /a/ sung in vocal vibrato.

Authors:  Y Horii
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1989-12

4.  Detection thresholds for sinusoidal frequency modulation.

Authors:  L Demany; C Semal
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Spectral differences in the ability of temporal gaps to reset the mechanisms underlying overshoot.

Authors:  D McFadden
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Grouping of vowel harmonics by frequency modulation: absence of effects on phonemic categorization.

Authors:  R B Gardner; C J Darwin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-09

7.  The perceptual segregation of simultaneous auditory signals: pulse train segregation and vowel segregation.

Authors:  M H Chalikia; A S Bregman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-11

8.  Fusion of simultaneous tonal glides: the role of parallelness and simple frequency relations.

Authors:  A S Bregman; P Doehring
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.