Literature DB >> 8433910

The perceptual segregation of simultaneous vowels with harmonic, shifted, or random components.

M H Chalikia1, A S Bregman.   

Abstract

This experiment was an investigation of the ability of listeners to identify the constituents of double vowels (pairs of synthetic vowels, presented concurrently and binaurally). Three variables were manipulated: (1) the size of the difference in F0 between the constituents (0, 1/2, and 6 semitones); (2) the frequency relations among the sinusoids making up the constituents: harmonic, shifted (spaced equally in frequency but not integer multiples of the F0), and random; and (3) the relationship between the F0 contours imposed on the constituents: steady state, gliding in parallel, or gliding in opposite directions. It was assumed that, in the case of the gliding contours, the harmonics of each vowel would "trace out" their spectral envelope and potentially improve the definition of the formant locations. It was also assumed that the application of different F0 contours would introduce differences in the direction of harmonic movement (common fate), thus aiding the perceptual segregation of the two vowels. The major findings were the following: (1) For harmonic constituents, a difference in F0 leads to improved identification performance. Neither tracing nor common-fate differences add to the effect of pitch differences. (2) For shifted constituents, a difference between the spacing of the constituents also leads to improved performance. Formant tracing and common fate contribute some further improvement. (3) For random constituents, tracing does not contribute, but common fate does.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8433910     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  15 in total

1.  Failures of attention in selective listening.

Authors:  D E BROADBENT
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1952-12

2.  The representation of the spectra and fundamental frequencies of steady-state single- and double-vowel sounds in the temporal discharge patterns of guinea pig cochlear-nerve fibers.

Authors:  A R Palmer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: vowels with different fundamental frequencies.

Authors:  P F Assmann; Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Fusion of auditory components: effects of the frequency of amplitude modulation.

Authors:  A S Bregman; R Levitan; C Liao
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-01

5.  Segregation of concurrent sounds. I: Effects of frequency modulation coherence.

Authors:  S McAdams
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: vowels with the same fundamental frequency.

Authors:  P F Assmann; Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Grouping of vowel harmonics by frequency modulation: absence of effects on phonemic categorization.

Authors:  R B Gardner; C J Darwin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-09

8.  Mistuning a harmonic of a vowel: grouping and phase effects on vowel quality.

Authors:  C J Darwin; R B Gardner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The perceptual segregation of simultaneous auditory signals: pulse train segregation and vowel segregation.

Authors:  M H Chalikia; A S Bregman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-11

10.  Thresholds for the detection of inharmonicity in complex tones.

Authors:  B C Moore; R W Peters; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  11 in total

1.  Speech recognition with amplitude and frequency modulations.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Kaibao Nie; Ginger S Stickney; Ying-Yee Kong; Michael Vongphoe; Ashish Bhargave; Chaogang Wei; Keli Cao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Responses of inferior colliculus neurons to double harmonic tones.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex; Hongzhe Li
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Spectral processing and sound source determination.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.230

4.  Responses of cochlear nucleus neurons to harmonic and mistuned complex tones.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Abnormal intelligibility of speech in competing speech and in noise in a frequency region where audiometric thresholds are near-normal for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Agnès C Léger; David T Ives; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Speech recognition against harmonic and inharmonic complexes: spectral dips and periodicity.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; John F Culling; Monita Chatterjee; Charles J Limb
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The interaction of vocal characteristics and audibility in the recognition of concurrent syllables.

Authors:  Martin D Vestergaard; Nicholas R C Fyson; Roy D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Inharmonic speech reveals the role of harmonicity in the cocktail party problem.

Authors:  Sara Popham; Dana Boebinger; Dan P W Ellis; Hideki Kawahara; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Harmonic Cancellation-A Fundamental of Auditory Scene Analysis.

Authors:  Alain de Cheveigné
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Neural Representation of Concurrent Vowels in Macaque Primary Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Yonatan I Fishman; Christophe Micheyl; Mitchell Steinschneider
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2016-06-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.